Worst logic display I've ever seen.......

This person would never win on a debate team......read second and third paragraph in description. I love the reasoning.....
Enjoy,
keoj
Display of irrefutable logic
Enjoy,
keoj
Display of irrefutable logic
0
Comments
Will’sProoflikes
And how exactly would that "great conversation" go?
"Hey Joe! That's pretty cool! What is it?"
"Some cheap coin copy that I picked up on eBay."
"Uh, ok."
Will’sProoflikes
Obscurum per obscurius
"Dear sir,
You are correct, it's not a copy, just a counterfeit/fake and should be listed as such."
However, he is dead wrong about there having been no "intent to decieve".
<< <i>Is he saying he doesn't think the law for counterfeits applies to his coin because it doesn't have copy stamped on it?? Huh?? >>
I think his crazy logic tells him that the 1870-S trade dollar was never officially produced, therefore there is no need for "Copy" since there is no original...
However, coinfacts shows approximately 10 known, so who knows if it needs it or not.
At least he cares about the "integrity and artistry of the piece"
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
<< <i>I think his crazy logic tells him that the 1870-S trade dollar was never officially produced, therefore there is no need for "Copy" since there is no original...
However, coinfacts shows approximately 10 known, so who knows if it needs it or not. >>
You're thinking of 1870-S Seated Dollars, not Trade Dollars. The latter weren't made until 1873, of course.
He's saying that this coin isn't a "copy" because there were no real 1870-S Trade Dollars to "copy." And therefore it doesn't need to have "COPY" stamped on it.
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
"Live long and prosper"
My "How I Started" columns
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
Even though no 1870-S trade dollars were ever struck, it would still qualify under the similitude description which means that it doesn't have to be an exact copy, "close" is good enough to make it illegal.
Woah, it isn`t a copy! Narly dude!
Go get him Chuck!!
TD
<< <i>There has never been a 1870-S Trade Dollar Minted by any US Mint therefore this can not be considered a copy. >>
There is some truth to this logic.
<< <i>Well, I took the time to report all the other counterfeits he had listed. Let's see what happens.
TD >>
Thanks, Tom!
P. S. I reported an eBay seller yesterday who had for sale 3 counterfeit Seated dollars and a counterfeit 1885 Trade dollar. He said "I don't know that they're counterfeit." So I told him how to tell and he didn't reply. So I notified eBay and his items are now all gone!
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
us folks who know these are going to want them as teaching tools and a mini bidding war is gonna start ...
watch Laura win this one