Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Worst logic display I've ever seen.......

keojkeoj Posts: 1,048 ✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
This person would never win on a debate team......read second and third paragraph in description. I love the reasoning.....

Enjoy,

keoj

Display of irrefutable logic

Comments

  • Options
    sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,316 ✭✭✭
    At least he convinced one person his logic is sound, himself.
    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • Options
    PetescornerPetescorner Posts: 1,220 ✭✭
    It would make a nice belt buckle, great conversation piece in addition to a beautiful pendant.

    And how exactly would that "great conversation" go?

    "Hey Joe! That's pretty cool! What is it?"

    "Some cheap coin copy that I picked up on eBay."

    "Uh, ok."

    image
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    Nice logic. Depends on what your definition of "is" is.
  • Options
    sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,316 ✭✭✭
    Is he saying he doesn't think the law for counterfeits applies to his coin because it doesn't have copy stamped on it?? Huh??
    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • Options
    shirohniichanshirohniichan Posts: 4,992 ✭✭✭
    Too bad there's no photo of the reverse. I'd like to add a type 1/2 reverse to my collection.
    image
    Obscurum per obscurius
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I sent this to him:

    "Dear sir,

    You are correct, it's not a copy, just a counterfeit/fake and should be listed as such."


    image
  • Options
    robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    I believe he is right that the coin does not need to be stamped as a copy because no pieces were produced of that date. Technically, it's a "fantasy strike".

    However, he is dead wrong about there having been no "intent to decieve".
  • Options
    StrikeOutXXXStrikeOutXXX Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Is he saying he doesn't think the law for counterfeits applies to his coin because it doesn't have copy stamped on it?? Huh?? >>



    I think his crazy logic tells him that the 1870-S trade dollar was never officially produced, therefore there is no need for "Copy" since there is no original...

    However, coinfacts shows approximately 10 known, so who knows if it needs it or not.

    At least he cares about the "integrity and artistry of the piece" image
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    "You Suck Award" - February, 2015

    Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I think his crazy logic tells him that the 1870-S trade dollar was never officially produced, therefore there is no need for "Copy" since there is no original...

    However, coinfacts shows approximately 10 known, so who knows if it needs it or not. >>

    You're thinking of 1870-S Seated Dollars, not Trade Dollars. The latter weren't made until 1873, of course.

    He's saying that this coin isn't a "copy" because there were no real 1870-S Trade Dollars to "copy." And therefore it doesn't need to have "COPY" stamped on it.
  • Options
    keojkeoj Posts: 1,048 ✭✭✭✭
    Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Options
    StrikeOutXXXStrikeOutXXX Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Aah crap, now he has my logic all screwed up too - yup, I got sidetracked with the Steelers game.
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    "You Suck Award" - February, 2015

    Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
  • Options
    notlogicalnotlogical Posts: 2,235 ✭
    This is my kind of thread. image
    What Mr. Spock would say about numismatics...
    image... "Fascinating, but not logical"

    "Live long and prosper"

    My "How I Started" columns
  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,640 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And some of you wondered what Clinton's lawyers were doing now.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not even collectable as a fake......
    Newman Numismatic Portal, www.NewmanPortal.org
  • Options
    Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536 ✭
    He just might be right about his statement that the Hobby Protection Act might not apply because there never was any such coin, but if that is true the piece is still illegal under US code Title 18 Sec 489. That section make illegal possession with intent to sell of any "token, disk, or device in the likeness or similitude as to design, color, or the inscription thereof of any of the coins of the United States or of any foreign country issued as money either under the authority of the United States or under the authority of any foreign government. . . "

    Even though no 1870-S trade dollars were ever struck, it would still qualify under the similitude description which means that it doesn't have to be an exact copy, "close" is good enough to make it illegal.
  • Options
    ccrccr Posts: 2,446
    image

    Woah, it isn`t a copy! Narly dude!
  • Options
    richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    Maybe its a not "real issued coin" like say.................................. a 1913 Liberty Nickel? image
  • Options
    saintgurusaintguru Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭
    meanwhile clw54 is bidding on it! image

    Go get him Chuck!!
    image
  • Options
    DesertRatDesertRat Posts: 1,791 ✭
    He doesn't show the reverse because the reverse is probably blank. Will be interesting to see.
    The Musical Road
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,153 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, I took the time to report all the other counterfeits he had listed. Let's see what happens.
    TD
    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>There has never been a 1870-S Trade Dollar Minted by any US Mint therefore this can not be considered a copy. >>


    There is some truth to this logic. image


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,640 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Well, I took the time to report all the other counterfeits he had listed. Let's see what happens.
    TD >>



    Thanks, Tom!

    P. S. I reported an eBay seller yesterday who had for sale 3 counterfeit Seated dollars and a counterfeit 1885 Trade dollar. He said "I don't know that they're counterfeit." So I told him how to tell and he didn't reply. So I notified eBay and his items are now all gone! image

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,213 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ya know what sucks now...


    us folks who know these are going to want them as teaching tools and a mini bidding war is gonna start ...


    watch Laura win this one image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...