An Interesting email Exchange
braddick
Posts: 24,148 ✭✭✭✭✭
I had a coin arrive yesterday that ends up being a total POS. It's not just cleaned but rather heavily polished. It has toning (probably fake) on top of that.
I thought I wrote a fairly friendly email to the seller inquiring about her return policy and my opinion of the coin.
Here's a copy/paste of that exchange (my email is below, written yesterday, with her response above mine, received this morning).
<TABLE cellSpacing=8 cellPadding=0 width="100%" align=center border=0 nowrap>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV><PRE>Mr. Braddick,
I have done nothing wrong or illegal in sale of this
coin. I did not misrepresent the coin in any way. I
sent you the exact coin you purchased, and it is not a
"fake." I did not know beforehand that it had been
alledgedly polished, as according to you. After doing
research on the problem that you have brought before
me, according to the ANA there is no law against
polishing or "whizzing," as the ANA explains the terms
in their terminology of what is illegal and legal. It
is an accepted practice for some coin dealers and
collectors, and some dealers and collectors even
prefer to having the coins "polished" or "whizzed"
according to the information. You apparently do not,
as that is your right. It is the same as grading
coins. It is very rare to have the grading of a coin
to be consistant by different people who are employed
by firms that grade coins. This polishing process has
done nothing to change the term "uncirculated," as
uncirculated means not ever being used as legal tender
in a purchase. You are mixing apples with oranges
here, and if you do not like the coin, sell it to
another dealer or collector who does not mind this
practice of buying polished or "whizzed" coins in
their collections. As I stated in the auction, I am
not a dealer, therefore I am not a legal expert in
coins. I was describing the coin as it was sold to me.
Yours truly,
Thellis A. Beasley
--- Pat Braddick wrote:
---------------------------------
Well,
This Kennedy arrived today safe and sound- thanks for
the secure mailing.
Unfortunutely it turned into a big disapointment when
I looked at the coin as it has been severely polished
(before it toned).
It's worth silver value, I guess, but not the $40. I
paid for it.
What is your return policy on this Kennedy as I
believe it has been misrepresented as "Uncirculated".
The premium I paid was for that plus the wonderful
color.
Sincerely,
Pat
</PRE></DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>I'll just blow this one off and eat the $44.00 but did believe her response was entertaining on so many levels.
I thought I wrote a fairly friendly email to the seller inquiring about her return policy and my opinion of the coin.
Here's a copy/paste of that exchange (my email is below, written yesterday, with her response above mine, received this morning).
<TABLE cellSpacing=8 cellPadding=0 width="100%" align=center border=0 nowrap>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV><PRE>Mr. Braddick,
I have done nothing wrong or illegal in sale of this
coin. I did not misrepresent the coin in any way. I
sent you the exact coin you purchased, and it is not a
"fake." I did not know beforehand that it had been
alledgedly polished, as according to you. After doing
research on the problem that you have brought before
me, according to the ANA there is no law against
polishing or "whizzing," as the ANA explains the terms
in their terminology of what is illegal and legal. It
is an accepted practice for some coin dealers and
collectors, and some dealers and collectors even
prefer to having the coins "polished" or "whizzed"
according to the information. You apparently do not,
as that is your right. It is the same as grading
coins. It is very rare to have the grading of a coin
to be consistant by different people who are employed
by firms that grade coins. This polishing process has
done nothing to change the term "uncirculated," as
uncirculated means not ever being used as legal tender
in a purchase. You are mixing apples with oranges
here, and if you do not like the coin, sell it to
another dealer or collector who does not mind this
practice of buying polished or "whizzed" coins in
their collections. As I stated in the auction, I am
not a dealer, therefore I am not a legal expert in
coins. I was describing the coin as it was sold to me.
Yours truly,
Thellis A. Beasley
--- Pat Braddick wrote:
---------------------------------
Well,
This Kennedy arrived today safe and sound- thanks for
the secure mailing.
Unfortunutely it turned into a big disapointment when
I looked at the coin as it has been severely polished
(before it toned).
It's worth silver value, I guess, but not the $40. I
paid for it.
What is your return policy on this Kennedy as I
believe it has been misrepresented as "Uncirculated".
The premium I paid was for that plus the wonderful
color.
Sincerely,
Pat
</PRE></DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>I'll just blow this one off and eat the $44.00 but did believe her response was entertaining on so many levels.
peacockcoins
0
Comments
<< <i>Man, Pat, talk about a two-step!!! She sounds like she DID know it was cleaned, the way she keeps defending its use....plus I didn't get from your email that you called the coin a fake.....she got bent about that too.... Hope it turns out okay for ya........but I doubt it will..... >>
Sounds like a form email she sends out on a regular basis covering all potential complaints.
Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
You may want to ask her if she knows of any collectors who prefer their coins polished. You can provide her with lots of information showing that polishing severely diminishes coins' collector value.
Obscurum per obscurius
<< <i>Braddick, what was the return policy stated on the auction? >>
That's my question as well. All that blabbering and she didn't mention it.
==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades
Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
I know within the auction text she states it is being sold as is (with no returns) so "study the pictures carefully". I'm also aware I offered a BIN of $40. and she accepted my offer.
If it showed up as totally AT (it is) I would have just chalked it up as a chance taken and another in the 'loss' column. I've had plenty of those, so I'm used to the disapointment involved in buying raw coins on eBay.
But, it's so polished it is worn down to AU details. I wrote knowing a return would proably be out of the question ,but still worth a try as it truly is misrepresented.
Again, has she simply wrote back and said, "no returns, period." I'd have moved on. But her reply to me? Come on.
I find her email entertaining and insulting at the same time.
peacockcoins
<< <i>Wow, the photo made the coin look pretty good. Can you post a pic of the coin for comparison? >>
Sure, it won't be tonight, but within a day or so after that I'll post a picture.
peacockcoins
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
(Sorry, it's just such a theatrical name)
<< <i>some dealers and collectors even
prefer to having the coins "polished" or "whizzed" >>
That's the best line in the whole email
Digging a little bit I come across this in her eBay feedback
Her email to me states she's not a dealer and she gives the impression she really doesn't understand mintstate/uncirculated from that which is not.
Yet, her response to feedback received (third feedback down...) offers a response that would have me believe otherwise.
peacockcoins
<< <i><a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1964-Toned-Kennedy-Half-Dollar_W0QQitemZ8416930954QQcategoryZ41103QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target=blank>Here's the Kennedy in question</A>
I know within the auction text she states it is being sold as is (with no returns) so "study the pictures carefully". I'm also aware I offered a BIN of $40. and she accepted my offer. >>
It could have been worse, she could have told you she needed an extra $50 because her BIN was too low.
Actually, now that I look at the auction (Not throwing stones here), looks like she ended early not a "BIN" and dealt with you offline? Maybe you can guilt her into a return...
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
Hey - ebay naru's Legend and messes with Anaconda - so we get Diamond Lil! Makes no sense to me . . . .
==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades
Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
<< <i>Actually, now that I look at the auction (Not throwing stones here), looks like she ended early not a "BIN" and dealt with you offline? >>
That's exactly what it looks like.
<< <i>
<< <i>Actually, now that I look at the auction (Not throwing stones here), looks like she ended early not a "BIN" and dealt with you offline? >>
That's exactly what it looks like. >>
I offered her a BIN of $40. and she ended the auction and emailed me stating the coin was mine.
I prefer to go through eBay (no fees for me to do so but rather on the seller) but the seller took it off line.
peacockcoins
<< <i>I am only excepting the payment in the form of money order or cashier`s check. No exceptions please. >>
In the few other of her auctions I checked she takes paypal also. Would appear to me that she knew that the coin was not as described and buyer would not want a wizzed coin. Thus the misleading scan and the "as is" statement and would only accept payment methods with no possibility of a charge back.
1969s WCLR-001 counterclash
<< <i>Would appear to me that she knew that the coin was not as described and buyer would not want a wizzed coin >>
Pat described the coin as "polished", not "whizzed". While both are very undesirable, it's best not to equate or confuse the two.
szavori:
Thanks to this thread: http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=505686 , I will avoid your auctions.
diamondlil1947:
Why are you writing me? I consider this a threat and will notify ebay.
szavori:
Threat? Not hardly! The fact that you have been outed as a scammer, you must be feeling threatened. It's your own fault, for the way you mistreat customers and misrepresent items!!!
diamondlil1947:
After looking at your feedback, I wouldn't want you to bid on my auctions.
szavori:
LOL! After looking at my feedback, you see that I pay right away! The only three negative feedbacks came from scammers like you! PayPal has always ruled in my favor when I filed claims against them! Your problem is that now you've become a laughing stock on the Collectors Universe forum and word gets around. What you did to that one buyer may have been technically legal, but it certainly wasn't ethical! Trust me, I will never bid on any of your listings, you are a joke!!!
diamondlil1947:
You know, I didn`t do anything wrong. This guy contacted me and had me to privately sell him this coin. I am not an expert or a coin dealer. He says it is polished. I didn`t know that. Then he threatened me and said he is having me arrested. He says the coin is circulated because it was polished. I bought it from an old guy who said his brother died. So now, do you feel better? This man has commited slander, since you said you would never buy from me. So now, thanks to you, I have a case that I have lost business. You have a really great day.
szavori:
Hold on, let me get a box of tissues and a violin...ok, that's better. Uh, I still wouldn't buy from you! Besides, I believe the Collectors Unviverse forum member story!
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
Edited to add: There is often a significant and legally relevant difference between relaying actual details/facts, as Pat appears to have done, vs. making accusations which might not be able to be substantiated.
<< <i>But, it's so polished it is worn down to AU details. I wrote knowing a return would proably be out of the question ,but still worth a try as it truly is misrepresented. >>
I hate to disagree with you Braddick but after looking at the auction I would have to say that she DIDN'T misrepresent the coin. She never claimed that it WAS uncirculated, she said it was sold to HER as uncirculated. Nowhere in the auction does she state what she thinks it grades, and she says that the buyer should look at the pictures carefully in at least two different places. The only claim she makes is that it is toned on the obv and is starting to tone on the reverse. She does not say that it hasn't been cleaned.
She does clearly state that the sale is "as is".
Sorry you got snookered son, but you did it to yourself. (I do agree with what some of the others have said here though that from the tone and some of the content of her email, she knew exactly what she was doing.
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
In an effort to receive a refund I wrote a single email to the seller. Again, had the buyer simply stated, "Done deal" I'd have moved on- nothing to see here.
It was her response to my inquiry that left me laughing and troubled at the same time.
It was for amusement purposes only I started this thread and shared the email exchange. Any educational value it may possible have ("eBay" + "raw coins" Be careful!) was simply a possible bonus.
peacockcoins
Mission accomplished.
Obvious to you, perhaps, but not necessarily to Ebay and/or an attorney who doesn't know all about coins. You might be completely convinced that she is the scammer that you called her, but you can't prove it, which means she has the upper hand vs. you.
<< <i>Another seller to avoid--though judging by her inventory, it does not look like I was at great risk of buying anything from her. >>
Sure, Robert, whatever you say, like you wouldn't have serious interest in this item!
<< <i>I would have immediately shipped it back and explained that it was not as advertised. I wouldn't have asked about the return policy first. (I hope you paid via credit card.) >>
and then Pat would get that REEDEDEDGE baby back just like I did from a FLAKE that has a ambigious return policy. I wonder if Pats seller is a PCGS authorized dealer also.
Ken
I'll bet she's fun at parties...
>>>My Collection
<< <i>You know, I didn`t do anything wrong. This guy contacted me and had me to privately sell him this coin. >>
Nope, didn't do anything wrong except violate the eBay user agreement and sell alisted item outside of eBay and cheat them out of their final value fees. (Of course the downside of this is that if someone reported her to eBay for it it would also nail braddick as well.
<< <i>Then he threatened me and said he is having me arrested. >>
Hmmm I seem to have missed that in the original email. Probably because it isn't there. Sounds like Diamondlil has paranoia problems.
<< <i>I bought it from an old guy who said his brother died. So now, do you feel better? >>
What has that got to do with anything?
<< <i>This man has commited slander, since you said you would never buy from me. So now, thanks to you, I have a case that I have lost business. >>
Slander? Seems to me that the only person who has been slandered (or libeled if you consider this to be a written publication) may be braddick since he has been accused of threatening people. And the only way she can make a case that she has lost business because you say you would never buy from her, she would have to prove that there would be a good chance that you would have been a customer in the future.
Diamondlil is a piece of work.
Szavori, you can learn from Coinguy 1 and others here. Watch what you say and don't bring CU into it.
I would have everyone email her questions on every coin for sale whether it is cleaned or not?
<< <i>You may want to mention that uncirculated means mint state, or unaltered . >>
Not true. There are many uncirculated coins, uncertified and in major grading company's holders that have been cleaned or "altered" in some way.
<< <i>I would have everyone email her questions on every coin for sale whether it is cleaned or not? >>
Many sellers, both honest and dishonest ones, have no idea whether their coins have been cleaned or not.
Questions from other members : LOT of 36 STATEHOOD Quarters+ALBUM(BEST Offer/Buy Now) Item number: 8407535797
Question & Answer Answered On
Q: Have the coins been circulated? Thank you for your help. Diamond
Apr-21-06
A: Lil, All the Quarters are GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED from the U.S. Mint bank rolls supplied by NF String & Sons, Dunbar or Brinks. They all are beautiful and disappearing fast. Thanks for your interest, Capt. Kirk
b. I don't trust purchasing anything through Ebay anymore.
c. We learn from mistakes like these. Better its only a $40 coin and be glad its not a $4000 coin.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
Morgan, modern sets, circulated Kennedys, and Wisconsin error leaf quarter Collector
First (and only - so far) Official "You Suck" Award from Russ 2/9/07
<< <i>
<< <i>Another seller to avoid--though judging by her inventory, it does not look like I was at great risk of buying anything from her. >>
Sure, Robert, whatever you say, like you wouldn't have serious interest in this item! >>
<< <i>
<< <i>You may want to mention that uncirculated means mint state, or unaltered . >>
Not true. There are many uncirculated coins, uncertified and in major grading company's holders that have been cleaned or "altered" in some way.
<< <i>I would have everyone email her questions on every coin for sale whether it is cleaned or not? >>
Many sellers, both honest and dishonest ones, have no idea whether their coins have been cleaned or not. >>
Cleaned and altered yes such as Anacs which will state Cleaned or altered net grade MS60 .
The ones that do grade altered coins state this on their holder.
I maintain that if you list a coin as uncirculated you are saying that it is mint state meaning (unaltered)
Not having the ability to detect a cleaned coin is no excuse, if you do not know then do not list the
coin as uncirculated.
I really do not give a crap about the symantecs of the issue, mint state means mint state (uncirculated) (unaltered)
If there are coins in holders because they are cleaned they are identified as such, and if they are not it is because
cleaning can not be detected.
I have dealt with many slimeballs like this, and recently received a 1921 peace dollar that was advertised as
uncirculated $350.00 dollars later I received a whizzed and dipped piece of crap. Should I have accepted this
since the net details were uncirculated from a distance?
If I am not sure on a listing I will not advertise it as such. I have advertised plenty of coins that I was not sure
of and listed them as (MAY HAVE BEEN CLEANED).
Read the email this person knew exactly what they were doing!