Home U.S. Coin Forum

Which of these two IHC's got a body bag and why do you think?

Both coins were submitted to NGC to be graded and one of them came back in a body bag. This is a hard lesson in why it is so difficult to purchase coins from images. The white spot on the 1874 is glare from the plastic so ignore that when deciding. Interestingly some of you have seen this coin at FUN and expressed an opinion that the coin should have been graded. So please make a choice and tell me why you think it got the dreaded BB. This is difficult so don't be shy about it.

image

Comments

  • The one on the right.image
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Does the one on the right have some PVC haze?
    All glory is fleeting.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    The 87 got bagged.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,092 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1887 got BBed. I'd guess because of the color--because it doesn't start at the edge?
  • ddbirdddbird Posts: 3,168 ✭✭✭
    The 87 obviously got bagged since the other has glare marks from the plastic image
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,386 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the one on the left has a reflection from the pastic, must be the one on the right image

    That said, the 1887 looks hazy, so that would have been my guess...
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I'm going to take a real long shot of a guess here....

    Perhaps it's just the effect from the image, but the feather detail on the 1874 almost looks to be too sharp, at least compared to my recollection of others I've seen (and a few I just checked out on-line). So, I'm going to guess it got body-bagged for re-engraving.image
  • Ignorance is such bliss, I'll take a flyer..... is the '87 a DDO? If neither IHC has a luster problem indicative of past harsh cleaning and re-toning, I like the color pattern better on the '87, seems more natural to me. Rob
    Modern dollars are like children - before you know it they'll be all grown up.....

    Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
  • The 1887 for "PVC", "Altered Surfaces", or "Environmental Damage". May have been skillfully whizzed or re-colored.

    I only say this becuase we know for sure one of the two coins was BB'd. Had I not known that, it would have been difficult to tell from the image (at least for me).
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The diamonds sure stick out on the 87. Retooled ?

    Ken
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    The 1887 looks like it may have been cleaned up from some environmental type affects. . .
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • BigMooseBigMoose Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭
    I think the 1887 got the bodybag. I am guessing it was whizzed and recolored.
    TomT-1794

    Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    I love the strike on the 74 on the feathers and thankfully they aren't re-engraved. I'll let this go for awhile.

    Oh and BigMoose I am almost positive I grab this out of my bag and showed it to you at Rick's table at FUN, I was setting there fascinated by Larry's collection and getting the coin education of my lifetime from him. Shylock was there next to me imaging coins on the fly.
  • 1887 looks recolored......
  • PushkinPushkin Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭

    Two things on the 1887. The area around the "L" and up through the feathers looks like some kind of AT or cleaning. Also, there appears to be damage to the "E" and adjoining areas of the Liberty and the lower band line. I'll say the 1887 because of physical damage and/or cleaning and retoning.
  • merz2merz2 Posts: 2,474
    Pushkin would know.I agree about the 1987.it does appear to be recolored.IMHO
    Don
    Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Hey Don good to see you, as soon as I finished cooking and eating I'll be back with the news.
  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with the comments on the 1887 ... looks to have been dipped and recolored

    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • 66Tbird66Tbird Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭
    The 74, area around 1 o'clock is the give away. Coin looks thumbed in general. That would be my 'look at the pic guess'
    Need something designed and 3D printed?
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    I think there are a couple of points here on the learning curve of collecting copper or for that matter most coins. I purchased both of these from Heritage and both were slabbed. The 1887 is holdered in an NGC 64 R/B and I feel its accurately graded. The 1874 in my opinion is a spectacular coin strikewise, luster and color, its got the whole enchilada going for it. However I think someone got greedy and tried to turn it into a $6000 coin.

    A few of the expert IHC folks from here viewed the coin and like me saw nothing much wrong with it. I am talking about folks who have extensive knowledge and some who have expensive collections. To the eye of those of us who don't grade for a living and see thousands of coins this would go unnoticed. Rick Snow pointed out what he saw on the coin. I still don't see it, but then I bow to his expertise and experience. Mark Feld knows this coin too, the fox. image
  • RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 19,680 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks to me as though both are in slabs.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    image
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    The wiping is in the field west of the eye and nose. I think the greedy seller attempted to remove a spot with a cloth.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Are you going to crack it out and try again?
  • 66Tbird66Tbird Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭
    Sad tale for such a well struck coin. Still it is what it is.
    Need something designed and 3D printed?
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you know what to look for and where to look, you can see it. Hats off the graders, I would have missed it. It's a shame; the 1874 is a better date, too.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Are you going to crack it out and try again? >>



    Barry I haven't in 3 years so I honestly don't know, it was purchase if memory serves me correctly for $185 and except for that so called wipe it would be a 65 or 66 red, trends show $5000 in 65 and $7500 in 66, which of course are exaggerated. It was purchased to go into my second IHC album which has other coins with problems. As Mark Feld said when he saw it, yes it was wiped but I would probably have graded it. I didn't put him on the spot by asking what grade.

    Pushkin we talked about this coin a couple years back and you tried to lift it from me, remember? image

    A little voice keeps telling me to leave it right where it is.
  • PushkinPushkin Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Pushkin we talked about this coin a couple years back and you tried to lift it from me, remember? >>


    Sorry, I'm having trouble remembering things I talked about last week; a couple of years is an eternity for me anymore. image

    Sorry about the 1874, that's a tought date to have messed upimage - I don't see it on the pictures, however.

    I do seem to remember that you were looking for an nice 1878 a long time ago, I think?

    Merz, great to see you posting image – how are you?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file