Home U.S. Coin Forum

Finally! An image of my Oregon that is true to form...Opinions welcome!

Thanks "MrSpud" for helping me properly portray my cherished Oregon commem!image
Opinions welcome!

image
image...There's always time for coin collecting. image

Comments

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    It's marginally attractive.

    Russ, NCNE
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It's marginally attractive. >>

    Russ was being marginally generous in his assessment.

    Edited to add: That is one gorgeous coin!
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not much to say other than... wow... its a keeper.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    stunner!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    i like it. very nice.
  • It's purdy. Can I have it?
    Don
  • Not too shabby. Not too shabby at all.image
  • LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    "Sweet" Very nice pick up. Congrat's
  • You post a coin like that and your not coming to FUN to show it off??? Your out of the club so now we have to change the secret handshake image
  • Somewhere over the rainbow!

    Really nice coin, Dizzy.
    Brevity is the soul of wit. --William Shakespeare
  • WOW!!image
    morgannut2
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Killer!
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    Dear Santa: I've been really good this year and this will fit into my stocking . . . . image


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • mrearlygoldmrearlygold Posts: 17,858 ✭✭✭
    A moose!image
  • Please enter my name in your giveaway. It's very generous of you!!!!
  • BladeBlade Posts: 1,744
    Holy crap! (In a good way)
    Tom

    NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

    Type collector since 1981
    Current focus 1855 date type set
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    superbimage
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    IMHO, the photo is overexposed and the colors juiced in post processing. Otherwise a good photo of a superb coin...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • ERER Posts: 7,345
    It's OK.






















































    imageimage
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭


    << <i>IMHO, the photo is overexposed and the colors juiced in post processing. Otherwise a good photo of a superb coin...Mike >>



    Mike, feedback, whether praise or constructive criticism is ALWAYS welcome. I must elaborate and say that when viewing this coin under good lighting, this is EXACTLY what the colors,and the coin itself looks like. I would not accept anything otherwise.image
    Edited to add: I'm dazzled myself as to how striking this Oregon is in-hand!image ...and I couldn't be happier that it's finally captured true to form in an image to share.image
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • TonedCoinTraderTonedCoinTrader Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭
    Nice Bands image






    Toned Coins for sale @ tonedcointrader.com
  • EXCELLENT TONER. GOT A SHOT OF THE BACK OF THE OREGON? KEEP THAT ONE HIGH AND DRY.
    commeman
  • PS THE GETTYSBURG NOW RESIDES IN THE DIZZYFOXX COLLECTION .BINGHAM IS OUT OF THE PICTURE. IF HE WANTED IT HE WOULD HAVE KEPT IT AS MOST MAJOR COMMEMORATIVE GYUS HANG ON TO THEIR MAJOR DUPES UNLESS THEY GET OFFERED SKY CRAZY BUCKS.
    commeman
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    The coin is adequate.image

    Might even squeek by St Feldolinis

    standards.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Very sweet! Drool worthy!
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Mike, feedback, whether praise or constructive criticism is ALWAYS welcome. I must elaborate and say that when viewing this coin under good lighting, this is EXACTLY what the colors,and the coin itself looks like. I would not accept anything otherwise.image
    Edited to add: I'm dazzled myself as to how striking this Oregon is in-hand!image ...and I couldn't be happier that it's finally captured true to form in an image to share.image >>



    You have the coin in hand, so I'll bend to your perspective on the colors.

    However, I stick by my guns on the overexposed comment. The photo has blown highlights most easily seen in the lower right of the coin. If you take the photo and look at the values of the RGB for pixels in the area, you will note values of 255,255,255 which is indicative of an overexposide photo. While blown highlights when photographing coins is oftentimes virtually impossible, the areas in which your photo is overexposed are too expansive for my eye.

    In digital photography it is imperative not to blow highlights and overexpose. In contrast, underexposure is a much more fixable problem in post processing, details that are not visible can be amplified easily. However with blown highlights, the details are generally complely gone and no amount of post processing can restore them. So if you are going to make a mistake one way or the other, make it on the "dark" side and underexpose.

    If your camera gives you the ability to turn on the "blinkies" or see where the photo is overexposed by blinking the pixels, this can be used to tell if you've blown highlights. Incidentally, the reason that this feature is available on some cameras is due to the problem blown highlights cause in post processing.

    Another feature one should make themselves familiar with is the histogram -- basically a plot of the brightness of the pixels. Some camras have a feature to preview the histogram immediately after you take the photo. If yours does, learn to use it as histograms are an even better tool to tell you about the exposure of your photo.

    I hope this helps, for that's my intent...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • ...Dizz....I don't think you have ever posted a coin that I didn't like...this one is GREAT also....imageimage
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice. If you posted a toned birthmarked full hair Kennedy, Russ would be more excited. image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Nice OR.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • The coin I like, nice..image


    I'm with Mike as far as the pic goes............but I'll be damned if I understand all that technical jargan. I too at times have a problem with overexposing my pics..image




    Herb
    Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.
    imageimageimage
  • xbobxbob Posts: 1,979
    I like it a lot. I have no Oregon commem yet but someday hope to find one like yours (that's at a good price of course).

    Nice combination of toned and untoned areas.

    Good photo too.

    image
    -Bob
    collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
    The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Mike, feedback, whether praise or constructive criticism is ALWAYS welcome. I must elaborate and say that when viewing this coin under good lighting, this is EXACTLY what the colors,and the coin itself looks like. I would not accept anything otherwise.image
    Edited to add: I'm dazzled myself as to how striking this Oregon is in-hand!image ...and I couldn't be happier that it's finally captured true to form in an image to share.image >>



    You have the coin in hand, so I'll bend to your perspective on the colors.

    However, I stick by my guns on the overexposed comment. The photo has blown highlights most easily seen in the lower right of the coin. If you take the photo and look at the values of the RGB for pixels in the area, you will note values of 255,255,255 which is indicative of an overexposide photo. While blown highlights when photographing coins is oftentimes virtually impossible, the areas in which your photo is overexposed are too expansive for my eye.

    In digital photography it is imperative not to blow highlights and overexpose. In contrast, underexposure is a much more fixable problem in post processing, details that are not visible can be amplified easily. However with blown highlights, the details are generally complely gone and no amount of post processing can restore them. So if you are going to make a mistake one way or the other, make it on the "dark" side and underexpose.

    If your camera gives you the ability to turn on the "blinkies" or see where the photo is overexposed by blinking the pixels, this can be used to tell if you've blown highlights. Incidentally, the reason that this feature is available on some cameras is due to the problem blown highlights cause in post processing.

    Another feature one should make themselves familiar with is the histogram -- basically a plot of the brightness of the pixels. Some camras have a feature to preview the histogram immediately after you take the photo. If yours does, learn to use it as histograms are an even better tool to tell you about the exposure of your photo.

    I hope this helps, for that's my intent...Mike >>



    Mike, your feedback is ALWAYS appreciated. I must say that when viewing the coin under good quality halogen lighting, that this is honestly exactly what the coin looks like. The colors in the toning are dead on, and the lower right untoned area is very white and lustrous. Thanks so much for your input for I am always eager to learn the finer details of the hobby and imaging.image
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • It's so pretty it's too pretty!image
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭
    Dang Dizz, I dont know how you do it, but you find the absolute best in Toned Classic Commems!!!

    image

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • I have had that dang Oregon on my screen saver all day....
    Bruce Scher
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I have had that dang Oregon on my screen saver all day.... >>



    On the compliment scale, you just got the topper.

    Russ, NCNE
  • That coin blows. Send it to me now, and I'll dispose of it properly!image
  • ER, fall asleep with the 'enter' key depressed?
  • Generally i dont like toners at all.

    But i love Oregons

    Oregon+Toning = Wood

    If Bruce Scher is drooling it has to be Wood Worthy ™ !

    Proof
    image
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Generally i dont like toners at all.

    But i love Oregons

    Oregon+Toning = Wood

    If Bruce Scher is drooling it has to be wood worthy !

    Proof >>



    If a pretty toned coin is equivalent to a little "wood". Then IMHO, this Oregon = imageimage
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file