Options
The myth of milk spotting.
Russ
Posts: 48,515 ✭✭✭
A lot of members around here seem to think that milk spots develop on a coin because of an improper dip or conservation attempt. This is NOT what causes them. A bad dip will emerge either as water spotting - which is not the same thing as milk spots - or as brown toning, or golden toning. This toning can be streaky or uniform. Water spotting is translucent and can be corrected, milk spots are opaque and generally cannot be corrected.
The milk spotting can happen while coins are still in mint sealed sets, or it can emerge on the coins after a period of time once removed from the sets. The nature of the spotting is the same in either case, which makes it logically clear that it is related to mint produced surface contaminants.
No coin I have dipped or had conserved at NCS has ever had these spots emerge after holdering. Plenty of undipped examples have.
Russ, NCNE
The milk spotting can happen while coins are still in mint sealed sets, or it can emerge on the coins after a period of time once removed from the sets. The nature of the spotting is the same in either case, which makes it logically clear that it is related to mint produced surface contaminants.
No coin I have dipped or had conserved at NCS has ever had these spots emerge after holdering. Plenty of undipped examples have.
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
Dan
First Place Winner of the 2005 Rampage design contest!
<< <i>A lot of members around here seem to think that milk spots develop on a coin because of an improper dip or conservation attempt. This is NOT what causes them. A bad dip will emerge either as water spotting - which is not the same thing as milk spots - or as brown toning, or golden toning. This toning can be streaky or uniform. Water spotting is translucent and can be corrected, milk spots are opaque and generally cannot be corrected.
The milk spotting can happen while coins are still in mint sealed sets, or it can emerge on the coins after a period of time once removed from the sets. The nature of the spotting is the same in either case, which makes it logically clear that it is related to mint produced surface contaminants.
No coin I have dipped or had conserved at NCS has ever had these spots emerge after holdering. Plenty of undipped examples have.
Russ, NCNE >>
Thank you Mr Russ, now I fully understand.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Can NCS remove those thick milk spots off of proof coins? >>
No, but they sometimes can reduce them enough to make a difference in grade and eye appeal. I wish I knew how, because I've never been able to make a dent in them.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Hey Russ, do you have any pics on your drive of coins showing milk spots and coins showing water spots >>
These are milk spots:
I don't have any pictures of water spotting handy.
Russ, NCNE
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
Might be quicker than some genuis hired by PCGS.
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
<< <i>I have a proof Kennedy half with an AWFUL milk spot just below the part in his hair. I have tried EVERYTHING. What else can I try? >>
I'll tell you the secret to removing it, but you must promise not to tell anyone.
Use a #2 pencil eraser and rub the spot with it. It will actually "erase" the milk spot.
Please do't tell anyone this secret. The number of proof 70's created will over saturate the market if too many people learn this technique.
Ray
That coin was spot free and pristine when it went in. Six months later, that's what it looked like.
<< <i>but that first coin really got a double dose. >>
That one came from the proof set looking like that. Unfortunately, it's a very common problem with the Accented Hair variety - much more so than the regular coin.
Russ, NCNE
Careful. Steve Appleton has been known to lurk here. (For those outside of Boise,
he's the CEO of a huge semi-conductor manufacturing company and nolimitz's boss.)
Milk spots remind me of some biology experiments involving Petri dishes and bacteria.
It's odd how these nasty little things show up once they are re-exposed to air.
Vietnam Vet 69-70 - Semper Fi
So what is the haze that invades lots of cam proofs, like this one? Is it the same problem of planchet prep?
(Edited to add: the haze has formed in the original Mint packaging)
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
<< <i>So what is the haze that invades lots of cam proofs, like this one? Is it the same problem of planchet prep? >>
It could be prep, but it could also be a packaging issue. If you store a proof coin in a vinyl flip it can sometimes develop haze very similar to that encountered in coins still in sets. That type of problem is easily correctable, though.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>So what is the haze that invades lots of cam proofs, like this one? Is it the same problem of planchet prep? >>
It could be prep, but it could also be a packaging issue. If you store a proof coin in a vinyl flip it can sometimes develop haze very similar to that encountered in coins still in sets. That type of problem is easily correctable, though.
Russ, NCNE >>
So how would one correct a problem of haze like you discussed? I have several proof cons which have haze but are otherwise great coins? Thanks, Walt
You did a great job of explaining milk spots - your explanation fits my experience exactly.
I am going to look for a milk spotted coin to donate to nolimitz for analysis. Knowing what the spots are is the first step in determining a possible removal process. (the only milk spotted coin I have is cooped up in a 59 Franklin holder in 5 ultracam). I seem to remember reading somewhere that milk spots are thought to be cream of tarter that was used in planchet processing.
I ran into a run of light cameo 1962 Franklins with lots of spotting - some were milk spots. I did an experiment and I am happy to report that NCS was successful in removing most of the spotting, but not all. This did improve the eye appeal of the coins quite significantly.
Cameonut
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Keep in mind the MS 70 may also remove light toning as well.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
dpoole---------the haze on that Ike is a result of the packaging used by the Mint. very common, happenbs to form on almost all of the coins left in the original packaging.
<< <i>No coin I have dipped or had conserved at NCS has ever had these spots emerge after holdering. Plenty of undipped examples have.
Russ, NCNE >>
This is what I meant by "improperly conserved" when I posted in the other thread about the spotted ASEs. Given the risk of milk spots appearing on any proof coin, it seems to me that ALL proof coins taken out of mint packaging should be conserved (i.e. dipped) before submitting.
I've had milk spots worked on by NCS for a business strike commem. They were able to reduce the spots but not remove them, and there were clearly minor flaws left in the surface of the coin. It made the coin a bit more eye appealing, which was worth it to me, but the experience demonstrated clearly to me the struck-through nature of the spots.
Hoot
<< <i>The milk spotting can happen while coins are still in mint sealed sets, or it can emerge on the coins after a period of time once removed from the sets. >>
Emerge is the correct word. Milk spots are a mint created imperfections caused by contaminants on the planchet after being cleaned and rinsed. The contaminants aren't completely rinsed away and are subsequently struck into the coin. They're permanent and cannot be rinsed away with a dip.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>A bad dip will emerge either as water spotting - which is not the same thing as milk spots - or as brown toning, or golden toning. This toning can be streaky or uniform. >>
It's worth noting that streaky toning DOES NOT always mean the coin was dipped. Poor alloy mix can sometimes be seen as streaky brown or gold toning as well.
<< <i>A lot of members around here seem to think that milk spots develop on a coin because of an improper dip or conservation attempt. This is NOT what causes them. A bad dip will emerge either as water spotting - which is not the same thing as milk spots - or as brown toning, or golden toning. This toning can be streaky or uniform. Water spotting is translucent and can be corrected, milk spots are opaque and generally cannot be corrected.
The milk spotting can happen while coins are still in mint sealed sets, or it can emerge on the coins after a period of time once removed from the sets. The nature of the spotting is the same in either case, which makes it logically clear that it is related to mint produced surface contaminants.
No coin I have dipped or had conserved at NCS has ever had these spots emerge after holdering. Plenty of undipped examples have.
Russ, NCNE >>
Very good post Russ, thanks for taking the time to set the record straight. For those of us not versed in the differences between milk spotting, water spotting, and the like, do you have a few pictures that might illustrate the point? Thanks again...Mike
[edited to add, I see someone in the thread already asked the question. ]
It's not right for the top company to miss a cleaning/altered coin. That's why it's hard to believe that this practice is allowed.
As I have asked many questions before about how to clean coins properly this would be just for my own collection. Not to clean a coin to be slabbed and maybe it is someone else's problem of spotting down the line. It's not right.
As anything else in life there are no gurantees but to clean coins post mint processes and submit again it's not right.
Lastly as I have over 1000 ASE's and many other 1000's of coins fresh from the mint I have nevered experienced a milk spotting effect just natural or metal alloy failure of toning.
I am learning more and more about the game and it seems you have to be on top of the best also or your money can be worth the same amount before you got it nothing.
<< <i>The nature of the spotting is the same in either case, which makes it logically clear that it is related to mint produced surface contaminants.
Russ, NCNE >>
I read somewhere, long, long ago, that the spotting was due to the wash the planchets received before being struck. Some of the coins apparently don't get rinsed thoroughly and the rinse residue is actually struck into the coin.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
I once thought they were the white milky blotches so common on ASEs. It turns out, this is from improper cleaning.
I have an ASE that I got from Becoka. It has a darkish spot on it. It looks like a hole has been drilled into the coin. It is a corrosion pit, a dark shiny spot that has eaten into the coin surface and made a visible, yet small depression. Not a surface effect; a deep defect and it appears to slowly chew its way deeper. I am told that _this_ is a milk spot. But it looks nothing like milk for sure. It looks more like someone took a punch to the coin and made a dirty hole.
Most dipping, of a non-corrosive nature (i.e. alcohol, acetone) is not considered cleaning and unless improperly rinsed/dried can NEVER be detected. Period. Cheers, RickO
I have two other 96's with the same ugly milking, despite being in Intercept Shields.
The acetone, distilled water, pat dry routine seems to work. None of my 20th Ann. sets are milking, after this method.
Could be pure coincidence, at least it gives me piece of mind.
Eagle was a nice, till I was milked.
Scott