Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Does it really matter what the PCGS pop report says about finest known modern Crap ?


I'm confused as to why the PCGS Set Registry collectors care if they have a 2001 D Lincoln Memorial cent in ms 67 red or ms 68 red ?I find myself caught up in the same annoying situation when I bought a nice 1958 Lincoln cent in ms 66 red for $35 and everyone tells me I need an ms 67 red for $2,500.Is David Hall and company
doing this to me or am I out of touch.

Stewart
«1

Comments

  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    All I know is that Q. David Bowers has written a lot of articles about this phenomenon and (paraphrasing) how crazy it is to buy one 68 for the price of 100 65's which are very nearly as attractive to the naked eye.

    I tend to concur. Then again, I'm not trying for a "finest known" registry set. That was a great invention for separating money from people who have too much of it!
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    I blame the liberal media. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    I thought it was your fault Stewart. When I saw your IHC collection displayed at Long Beach a while back I too wanted a set of top pop coins. image
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You are not nuts. You can apply the same basic thought to say type coins. Do I want a beautifully toned Gem PF65+ seated quarter for around $1600-$2000 or pay $5000 for a superb PF67 or even $15,000 for a superb PF68? The differences are rather minute. The value in the PF65+ coin seem obvious. Sometimes I have to stretch my mind a bit to see the value in 67's and 68's when there are plenty of coins nearly as nice just one point less, for half to one third the price.

    The Registry set mania is not responsible for the above as it has been in place since slabbing went into effect. But the pricing in moderns is nearly all attributable to Registry Set building. A factor of more than 3X to the next grade is a tough nut to swallow. It rarely occurs in type coins however. Exceptions are under 5% of the time.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    INXSINXS Posts: 1,202
    I dont think this just pertains to modern even older sets, pre-modern if you will, still have the same diff in price between a 65 and a 67. As for the registry I have 2 sets both moderns(SBA and SAC) that I will not update or add to until the prices come down. It has gotten completely out of hand. Even more so this year with posibilities of 05 SAC varieties with and without the satin finish.
    "Well here's another nice mess you have gotten me into" Oliver Hardy 1930
    image

    BST successful dealings with:MsMorrisine, goldman86
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    The concept of paying multiples more for any given coin based on a 1 point (and highly subjective) difference on the holder, or what a pop. report says is not limited to just modern coins, and many times the differences are just barely even noticable to even experienced collectors, and the grades on the holders are also subject to change in the future.....and probably will.
  • Options
    morgannut2morgannut2 Posts: 4,293
    Some moderns really ARE rare in superb GEM and time will show them to be value.

    AS to the SB question-- A Common coin in the highest grade is still a common coin--(Bowers). Buy one in less er grade cheap with super eye appeal.
    morgannut2
  • Options
    RBinTexRBinTex Posts: 4,328
    Since I have 1st hand experience regarding this issue, I can personally state that buying top pop moderns (TPM's) is like holding a hot potato. Many dealers hype the low pops only to themselves be responsible for future pop increases. Sort of like a broker hyping a stock & then taking direct action that makes the value of it go down. Am I the only one to see the conflict here?

    The VAST majority of them (TPM's) will decline in value - most certainly at least in the short run - and although some will turn out to actually be "rare" & hard to find/improve on, overall, one will get severely burned employing a "buy & sell in less than a year or so" or a "buy & hold" strategy unless the time horizon is sufficiently long. Even then, the annualized ROI might still make one wonder why they ever bought them in the 1st place.
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    <<< Sort of like a broker hyping a stock & then taking direct action that makes the value of it go down >>>

    The difference is that in the securities markets, individuals can and DO get caught, and pay very stiff fines and/or lose their securities licenses for life. In the rare coin markets, it's considered business as usual.

    edited to add: I have witnessed firsthand dealers that owned pop. 1 or pop. 2 classic coins keep raising their bids on the greysheet, then eventually dump the coin(s) and simply delete their bid, leaving the new owner with a coin that shows a greysheet price of 25-50% less.

    It was explained to me the only risk involved is if another coin is made while they are artificially bidding it up, they would have to take it off market at their 'bid' price....a pretty small risk.
  • Options
    pharmerpharmer Posts: 8,355
    True, RBin, better to be the one who finds them raw, gets them certified, and then sells. As far as a 1958 in 67, or a 73d, anything before 1980, buy a bag and go through the entire thing. If you find one that even approachs 66, consider yourself very lucky. A 67 then is almost a miracle, and gets what the market dictates.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The search for the finest has been around for a long time and will continue to be around. I find myself willingly paying large sums for distinct quality differences in coins.

    The trick is not to pay large sums for indistinct differences! image
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I start drawing the line at 3X or maybe 5X the cost of the lesser grade. On rare occasions do I venture above a 3X ratio for MS/PF coins. But the moderns have entered new territory where it is routine to find multiples of 50X to even 100X for a one grade change. Such a thing did not exist prior to the registries. Even an 1884-s dollar going from $200 in AU to $4000 in MS60 was one of the biggest spread coins. But at least this is the difference between a worn coin and an UNC one. The modern registries deal with 1 pt MS grade changes.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    No
  • Options
    sonofagunksonofagunk Posts: 1,349 ✭✭
    Stewart, no offense, but when you first started collecting, wasn't a 1958 "modern crap"?
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>But the moderns have entered new territory where it is routine to find multiples of 50X to even 100X for a one grade change. >>



    It's a good thing you never see that insanity in classic coins, <cough>toned Morgans</cough>.

    Stewart,

    You make a good point. Perhaps you should sell some of your many pop top duplicates and buy a few hundred undergrades.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Stewart
    You are right on the mark. With modern proof cameos, the market has moved steadily downward over time for the 70dcams. I was happy buying the 69dcams for $10-$20 while the Registry Nuts went after the 70dcams for upwards of $1000. I couldn't justify the premium for a coin that wasn't noticibly better unless aided by a 10x loupe. The market has now moved well under $500 with many pieces selling for less than $200.

    I know that there are those that disagree with me. That is OK - to each his own. But I have noticed that most that disagree are either 1) Dealers that are hyping the 70dcams or 2) Registry set owners that are trying to protect their "investment". All I can say is that I will be there to buy those 70dcams once the price comes down to earth - IMO it is just a matter of time.
    Cameonut

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭
    Sog - A 1958 is still modern Crap !!!!!

    Pharmer - The pop of a 58 or a 73 D in ms 66 is enormous.At least in the 100's

    How can anyone besides Wondercoin call a Sacajawea or a Kennedy half dollar RARE ?????????

    Stewart
  • Options
    pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,840 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm confused as to why the PCGS Set Registry collectors care if they have a 2001 D Lincoln Memorial cent in ms 67 red or ms 68 red ?I find myself caught up in the same annoying situation when I bought a nice 1958 Lincoln cent in ms 66 red for $35 and everyone tells me I need an ms 67 red for $2,500.

    Stewart, do you really listen to what everyone tells you?? imageimage

    The search for the finest has been around for a long time and will continue to be around. I find myself willingly paying large sums for distinct quality differences in coins.The trick is not to pay large sums for indistinct differences!

    amen ... the only set I have that even gets close to world-class in terms on grade is my Winged Liberty Set. I've tried to aquire only Gem's in the later dates ... but why do I want Gem's that are in 67 at $N x 7+++ when if I'm patient I can own virtually the same Gem (sometimes even a more attractive speciman of the coin, at least in some ways) in 65 for $N ... ??? image

    Now granted, if the 67 coins are truely superb (and certainly some are), then I may want to step up to obtain the finest examples.

    I guess the only other reason I would want to put the grade in front of the coin would be to be at or near the top of a registry.




    BTW ... my new ICON coin is still raw and always has been (she's an old friend) ... and I have more like her. I enjoy the coins quite a bit more than the plastic they reside in.


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Options
    Collectors have always paid more for quality.

    Before PCGS it might have been worse. The only difference was you had to depend on your own eye and ability to grade and now you get a third party "opinion".

    I think it is good for the hobby to have collectors with differing philosophies. After all, this is a free market economy and supply and demand is in effect. If there is a smaller supply of anything then the price will be higher and the actual price will be determined by how many want it.

    Nothing new here. You should be thankful that there are collectors with big pocketbooks. How does that hurt anybody. Everyone is still free to collect what they like at prices they like.

    You gotta love it. I doubt if very many big spenders are unaware of these dynamics. I've seen it in operation for many years and personally I think it is FUN!!!
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How can anyone besides Wondercoin call a Sacajawea or a Kennedy half dollar RARE ????????? >>



    They're "rarer" than most Lincolns - by several magnitudes.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    pharmerpharmer Posts: 8,355


    << <i>Sog - A 1958 is still modern Crap !!!!!

    Pharmer - The pop of a 58 or a 73 D in ms 66 is enormous.At least in the 100's

    How can anyone besides Wondercoin call a Sacajawea or a Kennedy half dollar RARE ?????????

    Stewart >>



    I said clearly to go through a bag and find one yourself. Of course it's enormous, they have all failed to get 67. Reread my post at your leisure. And yeah, why a 58 in 66? I made the first ever 58 in 67 many years ago, wish I had known you were going to be in the market, you could have saved a lot of money versus buying one now, if you can find one for sale.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • Options
    K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Oh Boy, welcome to another edition of Stewart and his ego.

    Let people collect the moderns if they choose. The high prices for pop tops aren't just arbitrarily made up by sellers, they are in place because of the demand.
  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The concept of paying multiples more for any given coin based on a 1 point (and highly subjective) difference on the holder, or what a pop. report says is not limited to just modern coins, and many times the differences are just barely even noticable to even experienced collectors, and the grades on the holders are also subject to change in the future.....and probably will.

    Bingo! Thanks, Dragon. I look at Liberty Nickels in MS 66 and just saw one in 6 offered for 6X the cost of a 5. Typically, the spread re type is 2.5-3X. It's often more for better dates (this one in particular is in between the two). I can't see paying this kind of multiple, unless you're comparing a better date which is a coffin in a 5 holder for a 6 which is a shot 7. And as we all know, this strategy is loaded with risk.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    There aren't but a few year/mm moderns I'll buy holdered. The others I'll submit myself. Personally, I don't have much drive to compete or complete. I just like them, along with many other coins.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    RBinTexRBinTex Posts: 4,328
    "The high prices for pop tops aren't just arbitrarily made up by sellers, they are in place because of the demand."

    I don't believe (IMHO) that anyone disputes that (with any exception being a very few blatant market manipulation examples).

    The point is though that the TPM that is Pop 1/0 today & selling for $2,750 (remember the '71-S Lincoln in '7?) will be a Pop 4/0 in the near future & sell for around a $1,000 all the while the seller claiming the pop will NEVER double to 8 - when it becomes a $500-750 coin - e.g.

    Thus, the "hot potato/hold for a VERY long time to show a profit (if ever) that even resembles the rate of inflation theory" image
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>all the while the seller claiming the pop will NEVER double to 8 >>



    Name a single seller who has ever flatly stated that the pops won't increase. Just one will do.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    I don't own many moderns, and most of what I do own were given to me as gifts.

    The point is most people with the registry sets like the competition, and if they want to spend big money on moderns, that's fine with me, I'm not going to put them down.

    I think your assumption that most who buy these coins as an "investment" is wrong. Most sensible collectors use discretionary funds for their coin purchases and don't think of them as investments.
  • Options
    streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭


    ALL RIGHT......

    Another MODERN arguement.

    Just send your money over here duds and I'll quickly send you a finest known certificate.

    What's the record of a modern lincoln penny now ????......about $50,000 or something.image
    Have a nice day
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just send your money over here duds and I'll quickly send you a finest known certificate.

    Hmmm - is that a Freudian slip or what? image
  • Options
    streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Where the he11 is the edit key?

    What's a Freudian slip??? Is that what Freud did on the banana peel?

    Remember, TDN.....most big dealers do not respect these discussions.... Have a talk with that girl will ya

    image
    Have a nice day
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 30,026 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    The Registry set mania is not responsible for the above as it has been in place since slabbing went into effect. But the pricing in moderns is nearly all attributable to Registry Set building. A factor of more than 3X to the next grade is a tough nut to swallow. It rarely occurs in type coins however. Exceptions are under 5% of the time.

    roadrunner >>



    I don't believe this is true. If you look at the prices of high grade Ikes you'll see they
    have not increased that much since the registries started. With few exceptions these
    haven't even doubled in price. Other coins may be up by a factor of a hundred or more
    but not Ikes. I would attribute at least half the growth in all moderns to the simple fact
    that these were rarely collected in the past so demand was scant. This increase was
    taking place before the registries and it has continued since the registries began. It
    seems unlikely that it can all be attributed to a single cause.

    Also note that many times these high grade coins disappear into a black hole of demand
    and do not appear in the registries.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 30,026 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I start drawing the line at 3X or maybe 5X the cost of the lesser grade. On rare occasions do I venture above a 3X ratio for MS/PF coins. But the moderns have entered new territory where it is routine to find multiples of 50X to even 100X for a one grade change. Such a thing did not exist prior to the registries. Even an 1884-s dollar going from $200 in AU to $4000 in MS60 was one of the biggest spread coins. But at least this is the difference between a worn coin and an UNC one. The modern registries deal with 1 pt MS grade changes.

    roadrunner >>



    Some moderns are extremely scarce in only a slightly better grade. This is largely
    invisable in most cases because only the highest grades are economical to submit,
    but it takes place in the lower grades also. With modern manufacturing techniques
    there is always a tendency that if something goes wrong it will go wrong in every
    instance and this can prevail for the entire year.

    This is visable at the high end of the spectrum which are the coins being submitted
    and results in and explains the large jumps.

    Obviously, many collectors will prefer to save their money and buy the lower grade.





















    edited for typos.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,188 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Real collectors set their own standards. Collectors with too much money for their own good chase supposed "finest known" moderns. Personally, I couldn't get excited about a post-1934 US coin no matter how nice it supposedly was.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options



    Stewart,

    I have thought long and hard about this issue. It comes down to the registry and PCGS in my mind. Granted, not all collectors want the best coins they can afford for their set, but most do. PCGS has capitalized on this with an incredible marketing idea that has made them rich. At least with Lincolns, the registry has created "hundredth of a point mania" where collectors are willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars so that their set can be a hundredth of point better than another collectors. PCGS controls this with artificial numbers. Stewart, I know you and how you look at coins. I know for a fact that your 1958 in 66RD is a very nice coin. Do you think there is any appreciable difference between that coin and the 67RD you bought? There are hundreds of 58's out there like your 66RD. PCGS keeps the machine (the money machine) running by keeping supply and demand in check. Submissions keep pouring in from folks hoping to "hit" on a grade. It's just getting more out of control and is going to cost a lot of people a lot of money in the end.

    Jack
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I probably wouldn't even think twice about spending $1000 for a top pop cent that I wanted to own even if the undergrade was only $10. That's an extreme example, but I'm sure the philosophy does factor into some of the rather large multiples paid. If the price doesn't reach at least a threshold pain level, then it's gonna be paid by somebody.

    Fortunately, my interests lie elsewhere. image
  • Options
    nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

    Seriously, who the #$%%$^ cares what other people want to collect? If it doesn't interest you, leave it alone. I think these crusades against moderns are just ridiculous. I think some of the "education" given to modern collectors is really just a disguise for self-righteousness. I think the best thing is to let people enjoy what they enjoy and offer guidance and help when asked. I'm happy to have collectors around me who don't collect what I do to enrich my enjoyment of collecting by showing me coins I would never have thought to own myself.

    For me, it is the sharing of numismatic enjoyment amongst collectors that accounts for most of my collecting happiness. If that wasn't there, I'd just sell what I got and move on.
  • Options
    MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    This sounds like another weak attempt to take a general principal in numismatics, and use it to try and slam modern collectors. Weak I say!! image
    The bottom line is that every coin in every series has a optimal collecting grade where a collector gets the most bang for his buck- he or she gets the highest quality without feeling like they overspent. Every series has coins that have dramatic price jumps between grades, and it has nothing to do with "modern crap"...
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No arguments from me. People can spend their $ anyway they want to (as long as it's legal and not incorigible). I've already stated my position on the subject; I'm very liberal about things that don't affect me personally.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 30,026 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Real collectors set their own standards. Collectors with too much money for their own good chase supposed "finest known" moderns. Personally, I couldn't get excited about a post-1934 US coin no matter how nice it supposedly was. >>




    Oh come on. Who said this was a modern bashing thread?

    Those who don't like quality in moderns may not like moderns at all.

    Perhaps the key word here is really "supposedly". If one can't grade
    for himself then maybe he shouldn't be buying moderns but then again,
    perhaps he should avoid buying any coins other than basal state or at
    face value.
































    last four words added in edit.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭

    K6AZ - High prices for modern pop tops ARE MADE UP.They are made up by the person who gets the grade.I know because I am one of the people who have made up some of the prices.Don't you realize there are targets who are known as "The Sucker Trade".I am also one of the "Sucker Trade".Demand my A$$ !!!

    Jack The Knife - I still don't own a 1958 in ms 67 red.I don't know if I ever will because the price keeps getting higher.Even Gerry remarked to me that he is glad he doesn't have to chase any of the "modern P Mints in the 40's and 50's.Even Bender has gotten cold feet.

    TDN - Your lucky that you don't collect or buy moderns as it is VERY COMMON for most pop tops in the 2000's to be $10 for an ms 68 and $1000+ for an ms 69.

    Stewart
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    K6AZ - High prices for modern pop tops ARE MADE UP.

    Making up a price is easy. Getting it sold at that price means theres demand. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    badgerbadger Posts: 1,217 ✭✭✭
    Stewart,

    I believe that I can bring structure to the craziness in pricing. I will offer 5% more than the price on the MS67's for all your MS68's. That should bring pricing in line and eliminate the premium for top coins.

    Badger
    Collector of Modern Silver Proofs 1950-1964 -- PCGS Registry as Elite Cameo

    Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
    1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
  • Options
    pharmerpharmer Posts: 8,355
    Made up. OK, now I see this thread was tongue-in-cheek. At least it will be an interesting give and take tonight, though. And I knew you wouldn't actually put a 58 in ms66 in your set, how gauche. Had me going there.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • Options
    lloydmincylloydmincy Posts: 1,861
    Russ: You are good. EVERY Kennedy is rarer than the darn Lincolns, which ARE THE MOST COMMON COINS IN THE WORLD. If anyone is buying a coin 10X the previous grade, call it what you want, but TWO people had to bid on that thing to get the price where it is. There has to be a demand for it.

    Any one puts their MS68RD Lincoln before 1941 at auction, You bet your A$$ I will be bidding on it. I am too lazy to search bags and bags of them to try to hit the mini lotto and get PCGS to grade one for me.
    The Accumulator - Dark Lloyd of the Sith

    image
  • Options
    CoppernicusCoppernicus Posts: 1,764
    Gee - I've never seen a thread on this topic before!! The top grade modern pops are what they are at this time. (Subject to change....by a lot!!!)

    My 1932-D PCGS MS66RD Lincoln is a pop 154/4 coin and I'll bet that the pop in this one will not move too much. Now, the post '59 Linc's and especially the post '80's are destined to have the high-grade pops increase!! Do you think that a high price will bring out some rolls of these? Oh yeah......

    Mike



    Coppernicus

    Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 30,026 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Gee - I've never seen a thread on this topic before!! The top grade modern pops are what they are at this time. (Subject to change....by a lot!!!)

    My 1932-D PCGS MS66RD Lincoln is a pop 154/4 coin and I'll bet that the pop in this one will not move too much. Now, the post '59 Linc's and especially the post '80's are destined to have the high-grade pops increase!! Do you think that a high price will bring out some rolls of these? Oh yeah......

    Mike >>



    Exactly, but some of those '72 to '84 issues will have much smaller gains than most anticipate. image
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Options
    ProofquarterProofquarter Posts: 275 ✭✭


    Say what you want about Modern Crap, but it was easy for me to find a PCGS High Relief MS 64 1921 Peace dollar 7 days ago, and I already have it.
    I have been looking for a 2004 $25 Platinum proof PCGS 69 for weeks. I have tried ebay, teletrade, and posted a WTB on the BST board for 3 weeks and so far nothing.
    Not all old coins are hard to find, and some Modern Crap is hard to find IMO. Got a MS68 Bison anyone? The mint sets comming out will have a different finish. Have fun, collect what you like and don't think the wife will understand.
  • Options
    CoppernicusCoppernicus Posts: 1,764
    CladKing - I agree! I didn't mean to say that All moderns are easy/plentiful. Some are obviousy not. But many in high grade are being bid up way too high, IMHO, and are destined to fall.

    I guess for me it's easier to justify paying 10 times the price for say, a MS66RD versus a MS65RD in an early Lincoln, that it is for an '80-'00 Lincoln. I still cringe though, even when I step up and pay the price in the early Lincolns for one point more. Of course, the coin has to be a PQ in the higher grade, but even then, it makes me nervous!!

    Mike
    Coppernicus

    Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
  • Options
    ARCOARCO Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭✭✭
    People need something to buy and spend their money on I guess. If not a top pop coin it could be used for drugs, prostitutes or financing Al Quaida. Thankfully, we have the registry sets that are filtering millions of dollars that otherwise might go to nefarious ends.

    We should all be asking, why are insane people buying condos in South Florida at $600,000 - $2,000,000 a pop? Now that is nuts! image

    Tyler
  • Options
    michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭

    roadrunner
    Expert Collector

    Posts: 4837
    Joined: Jan 2002
    Saturday May 21, 2005 11:23 AM



    You are not nuts. You can apply the same basic thought to say type coins. Do I want a beautifully toned Gem PF65+ seated quarter for around $1600-$2000 or pay $5000 for a superb PF67 or even $15,000 for a superb PF68? The differences are rather minute. The value in the PF65+ coin seem obvious. Sometimes I have to stretch my mind a bit to see the value in 67's and 68's when there are plenty of coins nearly as nice just one point less, for half to one third the price.

    The Registry set mania is not responsible for the above as it has been in place since slabbing went into effect. But the pricing in moderns is nearly all attributable to Registry Set building. A factor of more than 3X to the next grade is a tough nut to swallow. It rarely occurs in type coins however. Exceptions are under 5% of the time.

    roadrunner

    -------------------------
    Specializing in Mint State Liberty Seated - LSCC #140. Gold is currency once again.....
    James Sinclair's mineset
    Financial Sense
    321 gold
    safe haven


    imageimageimageimage

    write a book roadrunner and they wiull buy it and I WILL BUY IT

    if only one person is made aware and helped then it would have been worth it

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file