Help with a 1952 Carver Comm.....

I've been looking over these pics for about a day now, has this coin been whizzed and retoned ???
The hairlines on Carvers face are not as pronounced as they seem in the pic. and the coin has some nice color, golden with some blues around the rims.
I don't know a thing about Comm., bought this coin because it's the wifes birth year. Trying to get some brownie points.
.
AU 58 ??




Herb
The hairlines on Carvers face are not as pronounced as they seem in the pic. and the coin has some nice color, golden with some blues around the rims.
I don't know a thing about Comm., bought this coin because it's the wifes birth year. Trying to get some brownie points.

AU 58 ??




Herb
Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.



0
Comments
I'll bow on the cleaned and retoned comments to our more learned collector/dealers, but I still think it's AU
Hard to tell whizzed coins from photos like this....
Nice plan on brownie points. Let us know the outcome. We all need some help in that area.
<< <i>Just pass on it - there are zillions of nicer ones out there. >>
Yes, there are.
(Not mine, BTW).
Russ, NCNE
As for the hairlines on the face, they look like envelope marks or perhaps minor reed marks. Actually this coin is pretty smooth for the design. Many Washington - Carvers have pronounced marks on the face. I think that really nice, smooth examples in MS-64 and '65 are really a bit underrated.
In hand the hairlines can hardly be seen, it does have quite a few die polish lines.
BTW....... The brownie points thing didn't work too well, just came back in from cleaning the gutters..
Herb
<< <i>BTW....... The brownie points thing didn't work too well, just came back in from cleaning the gutters >>
Herb, don't be so sure about that - perhaps without the brownie points it would have been the toilets instead of the gutters.