Home U.S. Coin Forum

Help with a 1952 Carver Comm.....

I've been looking over these pics for about a day now, has this coin been whizzed and retoned ???

The hairlines on Carvers face are not as pronounced as they seem in the pic. and the coin has some nice color, golden with some blues around the rims.

I don't know a thing about Comm., bought this coin because it's the wifes birth year. Trying to get some brownie points. image.

AU 58 ??

image

image

image

image


Herbimage
Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.
imageimageimage

Comments

  • GonfunkoGonfunko Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭
    The luster looks pretty dead, so it probably was whizzed at one point, although it doesn't look too bad. I think your brownie points may be down the drain after telling your wife's birth year on the Internet, though. image
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140
    slightly circulated, cleaned, retoned... Just pass on it - there are zillions of nicer ones out there.

    I'll bow on the cleaned and retoned comments to our more learned collector/dealers, but I still think it's AU
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I see no evidence that is has been whizzed and/or retoned. I also think it could be mint state, though it's hard to tell for certain from the images.
  • Looks AU50 or 55 then naturally toned through poor care to me...

    Hard to tell whizzed coins from photos like this....
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    It doesn't looked whizzed to me. Looks original and low grade MS. Many of these were not owned by real collectors who knew how to care for them. Most likely just thrown in can or jar with other "treasures". The 1952 is very common and not worth much in any grade up to 65. However, 66+ is very tough.

    Nice plan on brownie points. Let us know the outcome. We all need some help in that area.image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Just pass on it - there are zillions of nicer ones out there. >>



    Yes, there are.

    image

    image

    (Not mine, BTW).

    Russ, NCNE
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,538 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin does not looked whizzed or cleaned to me. The black stuff inside the letters and in the field on the reverse is normal for one of these coins that had not been cleaned since it was struck. It's not pretty, but I've seen coins like that which were totally original.

    As for the hairlines on the face, they look like envelope marks or perhaps minor reed marks. Actually this coin is pretty smooth for the design. Many Washington - Carvers have pronounced marks on the face. I think that really nice, smooth examples in MS-64 and '65 are really a bit underrated.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ibzman350ibzman350 Posts: 5,315
    Too late to pass

    In hand the hairlines can hardly be seen, it does have quite a few die polish lines.



    BTW....... The brownie points thing didn't work too well, just came back in from cleaning the gutters..image



    Herb


    Remember it's not how you pick your nose that matters, it's where you put the boogers.
    imageimageimage
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>BTW....... The brownie points thing didn't work too well, just came back in from cleaning the gutters >>

    Herb, don't be so sure about that - perhaps without the brownie points it would have been the toilets instead of the gutters.image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file