Score or worn out piece of trash?
Colorfulcoins
Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭
Just picked this up on ebay for 99 cents + 98 cents shipping.......whadda ya think? To me, its a 1967 FR02 clad Rosy.
Here's the 48D PCGS AG03 that Tonelover made - does this 67 look equally or more worn to yo? Enought to get a FR02 grade?
Here's the 48D PCGS AG03 that Tonelover made - does this 67 look equally or more worn to yo? Enought to get a FR02 grade?
Craig
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Score or worn out piece of trash? >>
Why not both?
Let me try the "Yuk" emoticon --
No, that does not capture it. We need, maybe, a drool plus yuk -- a 'druck' emoticon!
Cameron Kiefer
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>To me, the reverse is noticeably more worn >>
That's my thought.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Here's an 1948-D PCGS AG03....made by Tonelover. Does the 1967 clad look more worn or about the same? To me, the reverse is noticeably more worn - the central devices somwhat and especially the periphery motto. The obverse is similar, perhaps a bit more worn about the center devices. With the internal clad layer showing, perhaps this will make it appear more worn? >>
This coin too was damaged ouside the mint. The pitted surface is a giveaway.
i would said grade 02
looks just like most of your MS 67s, except there is no blue toning????
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
I say PC holders it FR02.
Nick
peacockcoins