Poll: Toned Washington NT or AT

ddbird

I posted this when I bought it and asked opinions but recieved a mixed bag of guesses. More leaned towards NT, but I was just curious what most of yall thought. Thanks!

Edited to add picture...my bad..

kieferscoins

Post some of the other coins that seller had for sale with the same type of toning. They definately looked more AT

Cameron Kiefer

ddbird

This was his only other "toner"

kieferscoins

Ok, then it was a different seller with the same type of coin and toning. Sorry about that.

Cameron Kiefer

coinfreak499

Looks NT imo

FC57Coins

I hate to say it - but that 1934 has worse looking AT toning than the 1956. Given the relative cost of a nicely toned 1956 - you'd be much better off getting a really nice one.

FatMan

Looks NT to me. How about the reverse?

ddbird

I have alot of quarters that look very simlar to the 34...My grandfather kept them in an album.

Myqqy

The first looks totally NT to me........ the second one looks like it was cleaned, and then retoned slowly....

zkcoins

I still vote for NT. I have seen this coin several times and everytime...I see NT.

FC57Coins

Maybe NT or AT isn't the question - the question should maybe be - does the coin look right? When I look at it, it reminds me of coins taken out of the framed cardboard 20th century type displays, and most of those coins have been polished and have a similar hue to them. I'd say this coin is common enough that you shouldn't have to worry about finding another one that's both prettier and not as questionable.

Coinhusker1

NT. Nice album toning.

KurtHorn

Yep, really (IMO) ugly NT...

Yousri

I think it is NT.