WHAT GRADE WOULD YOU GIVE THIS COIN?.

littlejohn

Cam40

whoa, thats a toughie.....

goose3

those are difficult to grade in hand, much less by a pic!

obviously I have no clue but it looks pretty nice.

Scavenger

My guess is AU55 - 58

ccex

I also pead the fifth on this picture. It's better than my AU-50 of this date (the only $2.50 Indian I have with a complete date).

Cam40

looks uncirculated.......64 due to that line on the obverse that extends from the I.

just a wag.....sure i,m wrong though......fun to guess.

littlejohn

ITS BETTER THAN THE AU 58 PCGS 1912 I GOT FROM THE SAME GUY. I THINK I GOING TO GET IT TOO.
LITTLEJOHN

Russ

<< <i>ITS BETTER THAN THE AU 58 PCGS 1912 I GOT FROM THE SAME GUY. I THINK I GOING TO GET IT TOO.
LITTLEJOHN >>



WELL, IF IT'S BETTER YOU MIGHT AS WELL GO AHEAD AND GET IT. THAT SOUNDS LIKE A VERY GOOD IDEA. GOOD LUCK TO YOU AND BE SURE AND LET US KNOW HOW IT IS.

Russ, NCNE

whitehotmorgans

WHY DOES HE YELL ALL IN CAPS AND SAY IT IS BETTER THEN A 64 WHEN HE ASKS FOR A GRADE? HE SHOULD JUST TELL US WHAT IT GRADES THEN, AND NOT WASTE OUR TIME.

Cam40

HE DIDNT SAY......he didnt say it was `better than a 64`.....also, lighten up people.
its only a `guess the grade` thread or `whats your opinion of this coin` thread.
no need to get all up-tight.

whitehotmorgans

You are right. We shouldn't be so harsh on people who can't comprehend that caps are yelling. Hasn't he been here long enough to know already? Doesn't he type in caps a lot?

littlejohn

yes , i mess up . sorry
its a raw coin. not been grading.
i said its better than my au 58. not ms64
sorry if i made anyone mad.
littlejohn

whitehotmorgans

I am not mad. I am sorry if I made you mad.

Collect Morgans. It will make you happier.

Cam40

WHY IS EVERYONE WHISPERING!!!!!

robertpr

That picture is:
•Too small
•Harshly lit
•and too small
to determine, even haphazardly, a grade for that coin.

Nontheless, I'd say with about 60% certainty that it is MS60 or better, but probably not MS64.

lazeroo

for a 2.5 dollar coin it really is very nice.
it has the look of an ms coin for sure.

Cam40

yes, true that.
also goose3 said it whan he said`those are difficult to grade in hand, much less by a pic!`
guess though we can call it a 60 something huh?

littlejohn

i like my gold, i am not mad.
i just keep forgeting that da..m caps lock .
littlejohn

yes the pic. not much good. i sent a email for a better pic.

Stuart

LittleJohn: If it were me, before I purchased it, I'd ask the seller what those 2 hazy areas are on the reverse of the coin just under the eagles's beak and between the tail and the last "A" in America.

It's hard to tell from the photo whether that's luster reflecting or whether there are some hairlines from either circulation or possibly an abrasive cleaning.

The coin has AU details, but may need to be net-graded down a bit...

techeff

The coin has MS details. I would say it's MS61/62 or more likely "cleaned." Good luck!

relayer

<< <i>i just keep forgeting that da..m caps lock . >>




Perhaps you could compromise and use the "Shift" key when appropriate?

itsnotjustme

I'm no gold expert, and have a tough time with the incuse designs. For what it is worth, I think it's an AU55 due to the appearance of wear around the rims--look on the reverse left either side of the P in PLURIBUS (hey look at that... the die engravers had CAPS LOCK TROUBLE TOO!).

I agree with those above... properly case makes posts easier to read.

FullStepJeffs

My opinion is.... drumroll please...

It's Gold! Nice gold, but gold!

darktone

Most definately the luster is gone and the details look UNC. This idicates a cleaned coin. mike

dorkkarl

ms-62

K S

littlejohn

thank for the info.
i think i will not buy this one.
littlejohn

100proof1957

RAW ?

whizzed and almost looks fake from the pic !

kieferscoins

Cleaned. Bodybag.

Cameron Kiefer