1895 Morgan in Circulated Proof 20 Grade -- Photos
Stuart
Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
Here's an interesting low-grade very circulated 1895 Morgan Dollar in PCGS Proof 20 grade. If it was not a proof only issue, I doubt that it would even have received the Proof designation...
Not my coin, just an interesting example that I wanted to share with you...
1895 PCGS Proof 20 Morgan Dollar - E-Bay link
Not my coin, just an interesting example that I wanted to share with you...
1895 PCGS Proof 20 Morgan Dollar - E-Bay link
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
0
Comments
">"http://www.cashcrate.com/5663377"
******
Free Trial
So, all of you guys who want to spend $20K on a Proof 20 Morgan won't see me bidding on it...
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
(But not for that kinda money.)
<< <i>Wonder by chance if this is one of the unknown 12,880 business strikes minted in 1895? 5 of the known BU 1893-S Morgans were found in a mint bag of 1894-S's. >>
Can't happen. The denticals were different on proofs, proofs can be spotted until the rims are worn down past the denticals.
<< <i>For that price, in that grade, I think I would just find one of the 95s with the removed mint mark and spend $20k+ on something else. >>
Or buy a 95-S and remove the S yourself.
peacockcoins
<< <i>Can't happen. The denticals were different on proofs, proofs can be spotted until the rims are worn down past the denticals. >>
Different than what? There are no business strikes to compare them to. And the were four different proof obverse dies, each with different dentical positionings and some of the 95-S dollars have the same positioning as at least one of the proofs. So if there were 1895 busines strikes made, it would be possible that the dentical positioning could also match that of one of the proofs.
<< <i>Sure looks better than 20 to me. >>
Yes, I agree. Most certifed VF-20 Morgan dollars look like hell.
Quite often the rarer the coin, the more conservative the grading in cases like this. Although if it did get an upgrade, it would still be a VF, and even another 10 points to VF-30 would not change the price very much.
<< <i>
<< <i>Can't happen. The denticals were different on proofs, proofs can be spotted until the rims are worn down past the denticals. >>
Different than what? There are no business strikes to compare them to. And the were four different proof obverse dies, each with different dentical positionings and some of the 95-S dollars have the same positioning as at least one of the proofs. So if there were 1895 busines strikes made, it would be possible that the dentical positioning could also match that of one of the proofs. >>
The shape of the denticals are different on proofs. I wasn't talking about the position.
Billy
K S
<< <i>it may be a PROOF, but it sure ain't PROOF-LIKE!
K S >>
Even the Prooflike 85-P's looked more Proof than that "proof" 1895!
Billy
Billy
<< <i>That's neat! Here's another circulated proof... I wish I could photograph it again, this time under real lights, and with a tripod, and with 18 months more experience... >>
You can. Make an appt. ahead of time with the Museum staff for this year at the Summer seminar.
Cameron Kiefer