1892 Columbian Expo; Shot 65?
LeeG
Posts: 12,162 ✭
I feel this has a shot at 65 except for the hit's on the reverse. Nice tone! What do you guy's think on this one. Thanks, Lee
0
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
I'm sorry I can't give you any more than non answer.
<< <i>Would enlarging them help? >>
No.
You can't see the luster and it could be anything from a cleaned coin in AU to MS-65.
Cameron Kiefer
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>It is not the angle. It is the lighting. >>
Actually, I think it's both.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>It is not the angle. It is the lighting. >>
Actually, I think it's both. >>
Thankyou Coinguy. It is both. Can't have one without the other in this situation.
Nice pickup.
1892 Columbian
a real proof, now that would be a different matter....
K S