Choice Red/Brown or Gem Brown?
ColonialCoinUnion
Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
For me theres no question that Choice RB is preferrable for early copper.
I'll always buy an MS62RB or MS63RB before a 65BN or even 66BN - yet the prices suggest that I'm in the minority. Am I?
I'll always buy an MS62RB or MS63RB before a 65BN or even 66BN - yet the prices suggest that I'm in the minority. Am I?
0
Comments
Tom
I HATE spots on copper or nickel, and generally stay away from these pieces (even though I have a 2-cent piece worth over $20K). Put 'em under a scope, and most are spotted or even lightly corroded. To exacerbate the problem, I beleive they continue to ever-so-slowly deteriorate, and I don't like owning a waisting asset!
RB is such a tease, anyway.
<< <i>
I HATE spots on copper or nickel, and generally stay away from these pieces (even though I have a 2-cent piece worth over $20K). Put 'em under a scope, and most are spotted or even lightly corroded. To exacerbate the problem, I beleive they continue to ever-so-slowly deteriorate, and I don't like owning a waisting asset! >>
I don't mind a small spot inconspicuous on an original coin - in fact small spots can be an indication of originality.
I agree with you about the slow deterioration of these coins and the inevitable movement of copper from red to brown, which is why I cherish the 300 year old coins that still retain original red. I figure if they haven't lost their red in 3 centuries of potential mishandling and low-tech storage, I have a fighting chance to keep them looking the way they do now in my temperature-controlled, humidity-controlled intercetp shield environment.
Recently I've been putting very choice brown coins into my collection. I like the look, and of course the prices are lower.
True original R&B coins can be very attractive. They are fairly stable and are often good values. However some R&B coins have been "worked on" to make them look that way, which is sometimes not good.
I'm one of few people who really detests red copper. I'll get it for collectors if they give me a want list, but I seldom stock it. The stuff costs a fortune, and if it tones or grows a spot, you have either lost money or been denied the profit that you might have made if the coin had not gone bad.
Pop 1/0 baby!
Russ, NCNE
I like russ's two cent piece, even though its holdered as a brown.
I also think smooth even brown coins with strong original luster are quite nice as well.
jim
<< <i>I like R/B, but I like smooth even red/brown's not streaky or striated RB's. >>
Ditto. I saw an 1870 Two Center recently in MS64RB that was streaky. Even though it's one I need, in the grade range I need, I didn't even consider it. I thought it was butt ugly.
Russ, NCNE
Heres an example of a "brown" coin that is IMO incredibly attractive PCGS 67 bn
Some of my favorite IHC's have been RB, though I collect mainly red. Go figure. Here are 2 of them, both PCGS 66RB.
Those RB's look exceptionally nice.
Also a Brown Indian 64-L that I believe Paul was selling on the bay the other week that was a PCGS-66 Brown or something. That was one of the nicest 64-L's I had ever seen!
Here is the link to Paul's coin - a real beauty.
Link to 66Br 1864-L
<< <i>I have to admit, I would prefer to pick up large cents labeled BROWN with a little red around the devices. >>
Shamika, you might like some of mine. I started a set (1839 - 1857) which will be a mix of BN and RB. The images aren't the best, from a scanner.
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
With proof indian cents, I look for color, mirror depth coming through the color, and surfaces. A proof with nice color but poor mirrors doesn't do it for me.
Nic, that is a wonderful 1808!
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org