Home U.S. Coin Forum

opinions on circulated gold type coins? like the classic, no motto coronet, and $3 indians

BaleyBaley Posts: 22,660 ✭✭✭✭✭
what are your thoughts about coins such as these?

image
image

image
image

image
image

image
image

image
image

tough types to find Unc, and expensive, do most type collectors settle for a circulated coin for their sets or just do without?

I'd like to hear from intermediate and advanced type set collectors.

Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

Comments

  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    VF-XF for me. The top one is a little to scruffy for me the rest are ok-nice.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,342 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Personally, I don't like any of them. The gold market trends to be very upscale...the serious buyers won't want coins like these. Collectors need to become more picky.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1. Classic QE: Little too baggy/scratchy/dinged for my taste.
    2. Classic HE: Better, okay match for the capped bust icon coin
    3. $3: Like the date, very hairlined, I think you could do better without spending a lot
    4. $5: Like the date choice (especially the big "S" on the reverse, nice coin
    5. $10: Nice crusty coin, though to my eye, not nice enough for your type set

    I am working on a 19th Century New Orleans gold type set. I get coins in the best condition that I can afford while still getting interesting coins for the type. For example, I recently purchased a New Orleans half eagle. Instead of purchasing a 1844-O (the most common No Motto date) in Unc, I purchased the 1845-O In AU-58. My $20 NO type is the 1861-O in XF-45. In short, nice circulated gold types are okay by me.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,660 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for your responses guys, hmmm, guess there's not a lot of interest in circulated gold type coins huh?
    Well, here are the "answers", I will say that the coins look better at normal size,
    rather than blown up to the size of a salad plate.

    image

    image

    I guess I'm wondering if it would be better to spend the money to upgrade these types,
    or save up to pursue an early type I don't have yet,
    such as a 1795-1807 or 1813-29 half eagle.

    here is another coin, care to take a guess at the grade on this one?

    image

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • PutTogetherPutTogether Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭
    Baley........I think circulated gold is gorgeous.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    My type collecting theory is that you buy the best you can afford for the nicer stuff. that means circ on many old coins.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    I would go for the 1795-1807. Turban heads are neat image
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hi Bailey,

    I have filled all of these type coin spots with high end AU and low end Mint State (at least according to the slabbers) coins. In those grades, these coins are still affordable although "grade flation" is making it harder. I think that a collector would be well served to build his type set with the best coins that he can afford over time as opposed to buying lower grade coins all at once to fill the holes. I also think that many of these coins that are in Mint State holders are NOT Mint State at all unless you purchase pieces with at least an MS-63 on them. In fact MS-64 may be more like it.

    Here's my opinion of the coins that you posted based upon the pictures. I hope I don't offend, but I'll give you an honest opinion.

    1838 $2.50 - I'd grade it VF-30. It's a nice coin, but it's got a few too many circulation marks for me. I'm a anti-bag / circulation mark person.

    1838 $5.00 - I'd grade it VF-30, but this type of coin ends up in EF-40 holders. I think the coin has been lightly cleaned (enhanced) to make it look brighter, but it should still grade. I had one that I graded VF-35 that NGC called AU-55 that looked a lot like this. There are VERY FEW real Mint State coins of this type. The only ones I have seen were in MS-64 holders. The piece in my collection is graded MS-61, but I'd call it AU-58.

    1882 $3.00 gold - Sorry I don't like this coin at all. The marks have a pattern to them that says to me that this piece has been cleaned or wiped. Wipping was done to make the coin brighter. The sharpness grade looks to be EF-40 or so, but with the wipe, I'd net it to VF-25.

    1855 $5.00 gold - Looks like a nice coin! I'd say AU-50 or so. I purchased one as an AU-55 years ago and had it slabbed last spring. It came back in an MS-62 holder. Grade - Flation.

    1855 $10 gold - This is a decent VF-30 coin that will probably end up a EF-40 holder. This type is very tough is strict Mint State. 19th century collectors could not afford to set aside very many $10 gold coins that they would not spend for a collection.

    If there is interest I'll post pictures of the gold coins of these types from my collection.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If there is interest I'll post pictures of the gold coins of these types from my collection.

    Please do.
  • hookedoncoinshookedoncoins Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭
    As long as the coins have "the look," I have no problem adding them to my set. Only problem with circulated type gold is that since gold is so soft, they usually are pretty banged up (marks, hairlines, etc).

    Very pretty coins, though. You have quite a nice type set.
  • islemanguislemangu Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭
    circulated slabbed gold image

    here is another coin, care to take a guess at the grade on this one?

    You're throwing us a curve I think as thats a MS61image
    YCCTidewater.com
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here are the same types in my set:

    image

    This one is in an MS-62 holder. I'd call it AU-59, if there was such a thing. It lacks detail because of a broken obverse die.


    image

    This one is in an MS-61 holder. I grade it as an AU-58, but this is the best you can hope for in a 61 holder. These coins are very scarce in strict Mint State.

    image

    This one is the best AU-58 I've ever seen for this type. These coins are very scarce in strict Mint State and the prices reflect that.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And here are the last two.


    image

    The dealer from whom I purchased this piece many years ago called it "Commercial Unc." Today it's in an MS-62. This is about as good as it gets for an MS-62 from what I have seen. Most pieces have lots of marks and are not Mint State. The mintage on this date was just 3,000 pieces, but that fact does not add much to the price.


    image

    I bought this one off a small dealer's bid wall back in the '80s. At that time it was an AU-55. Today it's an MS-62. These No Motto five dollar gold coins are quite scarce in Mint State, but no quite as tough as their $10 big sisters. In general I'd say that all of the no motto gold coins are still underrated. The reason is that most collectors are happy to own or stop at the eight or twelve piece type set.


    And here's the advertisement for this string - I am a dealer, and if you would like coins like this, they can still be found. You just have look. If you want me to look for you, send me an email. A couple of comments - If you want to buy these coins at "bid" I can't help you. AND if you want me to undersell most of the crooks on ebay I can't help you either. There is no Santa Claus in this area of the market. Only good dealers for smart buyers.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Bill,

    Nice coins and thanks for sharing. image

    A couple of comments - If you want to buy these coins at "bid" I can't help you. AND if you want me to undersell most of the crooks on ebay I can't help you either. There is no Santa Claus in this area of the market. Only good dealers for smart buyers.

    I agree with the above 1000%.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,092 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Baley:

    No Motto Gold was one of my favorites to look for in high circulated grades. I like original crusty ones best but I mostly see the crack out game played too much with these coins. I have seen original beauties that get the bump after they have been enhanced. It is sad but I haven't bought a gold coin from this era for quite awhile.

    Buy originals when possible and even 45 is a decent grade for some dates. And yes I like your 1855 $10 and even the 55-s $5.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • mhammermanmhammerman Posts: 3,769 ✭✭✭
    Well, I will post a response but still have a way to go and I am certainly not an expert. My only qualification is looking at a few hundred pieces and owning a few. I am reading and gathering articles much more than I am buying. Counterfeit detection, grading early gold, encyclopedias, illustrated guides, etc...

    To my liking, I find that ms gold even a 61 ir 62 is quite sufficient to get the full impact of the coin and the nuances of the die/strike. U.S. Gold is very tricky from what I see, you end up looking at the most minute items to get the feel for the grade and then you realize that you are are looking at a weak strike that looks worn but not circulated and a weak strike can look almost like a cleaned au 40+ when it is actually a 61. A cartwheel is nice but with unc gold you dont always get a morgan cartwheel, it can be fairly subtle.

    I do believe that slabbed unc/au gold is certainly the best way to go if you get the bug but there just aren't too many of them to select from but you can buy very nice slabbed au gold early coinage for not too much buks. There are a number of ways to mess with gold, you can clean it, counterfeit it, and many other things and being a nice shiny rare metal...there are plenty of people screwing with these coins, at least there are sure a lot of not genuine or cleaned coins out there to be seen.

    Heritage has some and some of the other auction houses and I keep up with a couple of dealers that are looking but they are still hard to find. I wouldn't buy a gold piece on ebay with YOUR money...hee hee a sure fire disaster looking for a place to happen. Most people that have these coins are keeping them unless they are a rare date. The rare dates are excessively pricey. I have seen (and own one) some exceptional au58's w/cartwheel and set it next to a 61 and you will just shake your head trying to see a 200% difference in price. I find that for each ms grade, the price doubles for the indians and I suspect for other pieces as well. Ex, $150 for a very nice au 50+, 300+ for a ms 61, 700 for a solid 63, and after that you can just get your wallet out and leave it out. I will say that a slabbed 63 indian is a damn nice coin, one that you will see in your sleep!

    Bottom line and in answer to your question, I would say that MS slabbed gold is an exquisite coin and it is kind of like drinking lime in your tea...after you've tried it, you won't go back to drinking it straight.

    Best of luck in your hunting.


  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Although this one is a motto piece, I think that it's gorgeous for an AU "Slider" $10 Liberty with much fewer than normal contact marks: image

    imageimage


    This 1852 $20 Type 1 Lib (that I submitted raw) is kind of pretty also: image

    imageimage

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • ColorfulcoinsColorfulcoins Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭
    Circulated Gold - yea baby! 1857-S PCGS GD06....circulated and loving it!

    image
    Craig
    If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file