Options
Do you belong to the ANA?
I belonged to the ANA for 6 years when I was a younger. I am considering rejoining. Do you think the benefits are worth it? I used to belong to get the Numismatist magazine, but as a YN back then it was inexpensive ($15 a year I think). Should have bought a life membership - they were only $500 at the time.
Tom
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
0
Comments
I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.
Always looking for nice type coins
my local dealer
Steve
I honestly believe if MORE collectors were ANA members, we wouldn't be seeing stuff like the Mint selling circulation strike coins at huge markups. A larger, stronger organization would carry more clout with respect to Mint policies and coinage redesign.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
<< <i>I don't belong and would not belong until they clean up their house. Their internal problems are a real tun-off to most. >>
Care to elaborate ?
The mag is OK but not spectacular.
I agree with Kranky's comments of the lobbying value of a national organization representing the discipline but recognize that the org is divided between the interests of the coin dealer industry and the grass root members. That is not easy, nor have they been entirely successful. There is much more potential than has been accomplished. They are underfinanced and the hobbyist's perspectives are greatly overshaddowed in influence by the large revenues of the businesses involved in what you might consider a hobby.
For all the reasons above, I recommend you join.
(edited for typos)
<< <i>I don't belong and would not belong until they clean up their house. Their internal problems are a real tun-off to most. >>
I don't know about "most," but I otherwise agree.
Complete Set of Chopmarked Trade Dollars
Carson City Silver Dollars Complete 1870-1893http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=2722"
Also, Stooge, I believe that most of the "house cleaning" has already been done. Please tell us if I'm missing something.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Upgraded to LM in 1987.
Received my 25 year pin a few years ago.
Well worth the membership fee. Library, seminars, etc.
njcoincrank
No organization is perfect, and the ANA is no exception. They have a dedicated board of governors and officers, a very competent professional staff, and a wonderful facility in Colorado. The assn. also offers many educational benefits, like the summer seminar, library, Numismatist magazine, YN programs, etc.
I heartily encourage all collectors to join. Dealers, investors, speculators will also get more than there money's worth.
As was said before, you only get out of a membership, what you take advantage of.
Happy TG, all.
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
<< <i>I just joined. The mag is good and I feel I'm supporting our hobby. >>
I have been a member for almost 4 years and I feel the same way.
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
I've spent $30 for 2 years of membership... I've gotten:
Some 20 things from the Library for personal use, as well as two research papers. One of the papers won me $2500.
I also got a scholarship to the Summer Seminar... I learned a ton, had a blast, and it was all expenses paid, while normally some $700 with airfare for me.
I'm glad I'm a member
Jeremy
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
While some feel the organization isn't perfect, and what is? I think they are doing a great job.
member 60296
I was an ANA member. I didn't see any benefit. I am a PCGS member now
Lou C
ANA Life-Member
<< <i>Also, Stooge, I believe that most of the "house cleaning" has already been done >>
When they get it all done, let me know.
---------------------------------
"No Good Deed Goes Unpunished!"
"If it don't make $"
"It don't make cents""
(Was briefly a member under another number, back in '92 or '93, but let my membership lapse for a decade.)
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I know there is a somewhat negative connotation associated with supporting the ANA, particularly in light of things made obvious by the recent arbitration, if that's what it's being called, but, it almost comes with being a political organization. When you look at what I think are relatively low membership numbers for an organization that could be so much more effective for this hobby, I have to wonder why more "collectors" won't make a commitment to at least try to be involved in the politics that drive everything that surrounds our hobby.
Fatman, Kranky, Trime and many others point out just a few reasons why it is definitely worthwhile and should be encouraged among present and furture collectors. To do otherwise would make me feel like, what .. a bystander?
My coin club has a library with around 1000 books so I don't need ANA for a library.
FrederickCoinClub
Cameron Kiefer