What’s the most blatant error in grading...
dan1ecu
Posts: 1,573
...that you’ve seen the top grading services make? I’m not referring to coins where it’s arguable whether it’s an MS62 or MS63. I mean coins that are overgraded by maybe 10 or more points, or coins that are obviously damaged, but are encapsulated anyway. I’m sure that once in a while something like this happens. Do you know of any examples that really stand out?
Dan
Dan
0
Comments
Re-elect Bush in 2004... Dont let the Socialists brainwash you.
Bush 2004
Jeb 2008
KK 2016
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
<< <i>What's the most blatant error in grading...that you’ve seen the top grading services make? >>
So ACG doesn't qualify!
Sorry - I couldn't help myself!
Frank
The `splattered-mud` toned look.
Oh well,I guess its an aquired taste for those.
I really hate this coin.
Frank
I had a coin with the wrong year on the label, does that count?
The Shillden scale I thingk
The picture is from my collection... the link for the tree is completely different
although that MS-90 Morgan is a hoot!
Actually, I bought this slab from my local shop. I needed the coin, and the added humor was too good to pass up.
To parphrase Harry Truman, "It is the president of the counterfeit club ... they've got no compeption.
Last show I went to, a dealer showed me a MS-67 ACG Liberty Nickel, that honestly graded GD-04. I knew they were bad, but now they are getting blatant.
peacockcoins
K S
1) Clackamas - A large % of older slabbed RB Unc. large cents would be in
BN holders if they were slabbed today. My words of wisdom re old
copper is that if isn't at least 90% RD, don't buy it as RD, and if it
isn't at least 40% RD, don't buy it as RB, just to be safe.
2) Here is it.......
I was at a Goldberg viewing session a year ago February. An older guy
next to me looks at a coin, starts laughing, and says, "how'd you like
to see a real expensive piece of plastic?"
I said, "sure, I'll look at it." I saw a 1796 either Large or Half
Cent with Pole (sorry, I don't pay much attention to coins THAT
expensive) encapsulated by PCGS & listed as AU 55. The thing was so
worn -- and I can tell the difference between wear and a poorly struck
coin -- that I don't think it was a VF coin.
Other than that, I'll occasionally see a SLQ slabbed as FH when it's not even close to that designation. What I find upsetting are the at least 10 MS 64 & 5 lifeless, dipped-out, unattractive Trade & Seated $s I've seen (have never seen a Seated $ in MS 64 or 5 or a Trade $ in MS 65 that I thought was attractive for the grade).
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."