GTG: 1909-s Wheat Cent

ProofCollection

This cent is currently in an NGC Fattie and has a green CAC sticker. I firmly believe this wheat cent is undergraded so having you guys guess what the slab says would be a bit of trickery. I'm interested to see what you guys would grade it though before I lobby for a gold CAC sticker or send to PCGS for crossover.
The coin is solidly RED. I know the photos bring doubt, but that's my lighting struggles.
I have three sets of photos, it is the same coin.

MsMorrisine

the best photo is the first reverse and it's still too dark

Whit

Without getting into whether it's slabbed RD or not, I'd not be surprised to see this in a 63 or 64RD holder. Of those two, I lean to 64.

ambro51

This appears to be the S over horizontal S variety, Looks 65 from photo 1

Coinscratch

Looks like a 66 so I’ll go 65 based on the slab and sticker.

Relaxn

64 red
65 RB
Based.on these photos " No Sticker for You"

johnny9434

65 rb

thebeav

64 rd

jfriedm56

64RD

Tom147

64RD

Walkerguy21D

My guess like most others is 64rd, but that you think it should be 65 rd.

WaterSport

Sorry, I can't tell the grade with photos - but while you are at it you might want to consider getting the Variety Attribution of RPM 2 or (FS-1502) varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1909SRPM002.htm

Again, hard to see with your pics, but it may also be VDDR-001 - Nothing PCGS would attribute but you could take a look here to see if it is. You need to look at the T in United to see if it is doubled. varietyvista.com/01a%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%201/1909SDDR001.htm

MWallace

64RD

ProofCollection

Thanks guys, I realize my images to too poor to do this effectively. I'll see if I can get some better images and start over.

Before I received the coin I thought it was S/S but in hand it most certainly is not.

tradedollarnut

All I know is that if it’s a 65rb then I wanna buy it. Lol

Mr_Spud

66

marcmoish

64RD

Smudge

64RD.

safari_dude

63 RB

TPring

@ProofCollection said:
Thanks guys, I realize my images to too poor to do this effectively. I'll see if I can get some better images and start over.

Before I received the coin I thought it was S/S but in hand it most certainly is not.

Not sure how you are doing your comparison, but an overlay appears to precisely match up [given the pic quality] -- Not only that, the little glint of shiny metal immediately to the east lines up with the VV pic. That being said, if it is the variety then it is not major as that variety is a "dime -a-dozen" and really wouldn't add much [if any] value.

Walkerfan

65RD

ProofCollection

@TPring said:

@ProofCollection said:
Thanks guys, I realize my images to too poor to do this effectively. I'll see if I can get some better images and start over.

Before I received the coin I thought it was S/S but in hand it most certainly is not.

Not sure how you are doing your comparison, but an overlay appears to precisely match up [given the pic quality] -- Not only that, the little glint of shiny metal immediately to the east lines up with the VV pic. That being said, if it is the variety then it is not major as that variety is a "dime -a-dozen" and really wouldn't add much [if any] value.

In person, the the MM is nice and clean. I thought it might be S/S also, but when I got it I could easily see it's not.
Incidentally, the PCGS price guide shows the S/S prices are lower than non-S/S.

Tramp

I'm going with 64RB. OP could be hoping for a 65RD with an $750 jump per PCGS coinfacts. JMO

Cougar1978

64RD

Crypto

64 Rd

cheezhed

64Red