Here's my Type 3 gold dollar- post yours

lordmarcovan

PCGS MS65, ex. D.L. Hansen.

lordmarcovan

What do you suppose that little divot is, off to the right of the 5 in the date? Planchet flaw?

winesteven

Steve

Aspie_Rocco

@lordmarcovan said:
What do you suppose that little divot is, off to the right of the 5 in the date? Planchet flaw?

That or a stuck through?

Twobitcollector

lordmarcovan

@Aspie_Rocco said:

@lordmarcovan said:
What do you suppose that little divot is, off to the right of the 5 in the date? Planchet flaw?

That or a stuck through?

Maybe?

Mr_Spud

ambro51

……….and now for one that was actually USED.

PhilLynott

Copperindian

1861 pair:

Going to submit the 1861-D to PCGS for a “mint error” designation @ WFOM. I’ve been told, if approved, the coin will be straight graded somewhere between AU50-AU55. Definitely worth a try for this piece of history.

liefgold

@Copperindian said:

Going to submit the 1861-D to PCGS for a “mint error” designation @ WFOM. I’ve been told, if approved, the coin will be straight graded somewhere between AU50-AU55. Definitely worth a try for this piece of history.

I believe I was the underbidder on that one. It is a beauty.

Here is another D mint:

Downtown1974

bammbamm

One of my favorite Type-3 gold dollars. NGC VF20. San Francisco mintmark. A coin that was used in commerce. Lots of detail for the grade and beautiful original surfaces.

CommemDude

Byers

BillJones

Here is my only "old gold" Proof coin. The Type III Gold Dollar is the most common pre 1933 gold coin as Proof. The story was jewelers bought them. If true, there should be more impaired examples.

Here is my highest grade piece, an MS-67.

And this is my most under graded piece. This is graded MS-65; I think that it is better.

Coinbert

MS 68 CAC

asheland

edwardjulio

58/CAC

Byers

asheland

Also, this one, I absolutely adore this coin: