Home U.S. Coin Forum

Grade this 1891 S Morgan?

I bought this Morgan recently. It came in an old coin holder with an old label that said it was MS 64 and they had it priced at $450. There is no way it is MS 64! In my opinion I think it is MS 62 or 63 possibly? Am I close? Any input is appreciated!! Hope my photos are fine, it's been awhile since I've photographed a coin!

Comments

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OK, I'll bite at 63 with the usual caveats....

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62 would be fine.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63-ish

    Collector, occasional seller

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could be a 64. Was it graded by one of the 3 top grading companies or just guesstimated. Strike is nice, but surfaces look a bit mottled. So I will say 63.

  • AtcarrollAtcarroll Posts: 405 ✭✭✭✭

    Based on the photos I like it at 63.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,983 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-62 became the frost is broken on the eagle’s breast feathers on the reverse.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From photo easily a 63.

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,104 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a bad looking coin-63 seems reasonable

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That coin looks like a nice 63 if I am reading the images correctly. Looks like really nice frost


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS63, and I have seen worse in MS64 holders with silly little stickers. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blitzdude said:
    MS63, and I have seen worse in MS64 holders with silly little stickers. RGDS!

    And your anti-CAC obsession continues. It's sad.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it as a 62 - maybe if I see it in hand it could be a 63 with extra eye appeal.

    Easton Collection
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63 and I’d grade it higher before I’d grade it lower than that.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    63 and I’d grade it higher before I’d grade it lower than that.

    The marks on the reverse above the Eagle and the marks on the obverse around the neck gets me to 62. If in hand its isn't as bad that i see it on the photo, then maybe 63. Just my 2 cents.

    Easton Collection
  • TypekatTypekat Posts: 381 ✭✭✭✭

    Good photo! I agree with the crowd, pretty much MS63 all day.

    I’m wondering why you bought it, since “no way it is a MS 64!” ?

    30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    63 and I’d grade it higher before I’d grade it lower than that.

    Now we know where gradeflation came from 😜 (just kidding but couldn’t resist Mark).

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny010 said:

    @MFeld said:
    63 and I’d grade it higher before I’d grade it lower than that.

    Now we know where gradeflation came from 😜 (just kidding but couldn’t resist Mark).

    You’re on to me!😉
    Very few people are aware of this but originally, the term was MarkFeld’s-grade-flation (“MFGF” for short). However, I petitioned for a change to what’s now referred to. simply as “grade-flation”.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • jp84jp84 Posts: 202 ✭✭✭

    62

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 24, 2024 9:53AM

    Here’s a PCGS MS63:

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with the 63 camp.

  • DocBenjaminDocBenjamin Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @blitzdude said:
    MS63, and I have seen worse in MS64 holders with silly little stickers. RGDS!

    And your anti-CAC obsession continues. It's sad.

    It is not sad. The CAC experiment resulted a windfall for dealers and a nuisance for collectors.

    Have looked at many many coin listings since the inception, small Ebay hacks up to billion dollar a year auctioneers. Coins with a sticker are boldly noted in the title line, but have never seen an admission that a coin had been submitted and failed.

    Became a guessing game to the buyers. Has it been to CAC or not?

    Yeah I get all the reasons why that would be a costly gambit to the sellers, but the fourth party verifier could never jimp that hurdle.

    Fortunately the company stepped up to the plate and went full service. When the stickies are retired, the hobby will be better off.

  • mattnissmattniss Posts: 704 ✭✭✭✭

    Without looking at anything other than OP's pictures, I saw it as a standard 63. Too much going on to be a 4 in my opinion, but it's good enough for 3.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DocBenjamin said:

    @MFeld said:

    @blitzdude said:
    MS63, and I have seen worse in MS64 holders with silly little stickers. RGDS!

    And your anti-CAC obsession continues. It's sad.

    It is not sad. The CAC experiment resulted a windfall for dealers and a nuisance for collectors.

    Have looked at many many coin listings since the inception, small Ebay hacks up to billion dollar a year auctioneers. Coins with a sticker are boldly noted in the title line, but have never seen an admission that a coin had been submitted and failed.

    Became a guessing game to the buyers. Has it been to CAC or not?

    Yeah I get all the reasons why that would be a costly gambit to the sellers, but the fourth party verifier could never jimp that hurdle.

    Fortunately the company stepped up to the plate and went full service. When the stickies are retired, the hobby will be better off.

    All of that’s largely beside the point. That poster often makes anti-CAC comments even when the thread topic has absolutely nothing to do with CAC. Yes, others sometimes do the same with pro-CAC comments but not to the extent he does.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • DocBenjaminDocBenjamin Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @DocBenjamin said:

    @MFeld said:

    @blitzdude said:
    MS63, and I have seen worse in MS64 holders with silly little stickers. RGDS!

    And your anti-CAC obsession continues. It's sad.

    It is not sad. The CAC experiment resulted a windfall for dealers and a nuisance for collectors.

    Have looked at many many coin listings since the inception, small Ebay hacks up to billion dollar a year auctioneers. Coins with a sticker are boldly noted in the title line, but have never seen an admission that a coin had been submitted and failed.

    Became a guessing game to the buyers. Has it been to CAC or not?

    Yeah I get all the reasons why that would be a costly gambit to the sellers, but the fourth party verifier could never jimp that hurdle.

    Fortunately the company stepped up to the plate and went full service. When the stickies are retired, the hobby will be better off.

    All of that’s largely beside the point. That poster often makes anti-CAC comments even when the thread topic has absolutely nothing to do with CAC. Yes, others sometimes do the same with pro-CAC comments but not to the extent he does.

    Guess that is a rule violation. Got to speak well of the competition or hold your tongue.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file