Home U.S. Coin Forum

WHO WANTS TO GUESS THE GRADE OF THIS 1901 $10 *UPDATE* ONLY 1 PERSON GOT IT RIGHT!

joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 13, 2024 7:57PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Reverse of slab edited to remove company name selling this coin




may the fonz be with you...always...
«1

Comments

  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,746 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As a disclaimer- remember you all dont see the coin in hand and apparently 3 professional graders who are much smarter and educated than us felt it deserved the given grade

    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62. Too much going on in key visual areas on the obverse to justify anything higher.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭✭✭

    60 shot 61

  • raysrays Posts: 2,378 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can't see above 61 and think 60 might be the grade with anything higher a gift of sorts. Looks like almost a grinding on the cheek.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62 only because the luster looks satiny and muted in those photos. Is the base grade is higher and it has some cartwheel, MS63 is very likely. While the cheek is rough, the fields are 64+ near gem. So the base grade is needed to apply the subtractions.

  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,456 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That cheek chatter is disconcerting. MS60+

  • MS63. But I’m terrible at grading gold, so I expect to be wrong.

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • CoinlearnerCoinlearner Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭✭

    MS 63 PL

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,994 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:
    MS62 only because the luster looks satiny and muted in those photos. Is the base grade is higher and it has some cartwheel, MS63 is very likely. While the cheek is rough, the fields are 64+ near gem. So the base grade is needed to apply the subtractions.

    Makes the most sense..

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Baylor8670Baylor8670 Posts: 93 ✭✭✭

    Real guess = 61

    Guess adjusted based on the tone of your subsequent post = 58

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    My thought before reading the guesses was ... "my mind wants to say 62 because of the cheek but at the same time the fields and the luster and the rest of the coin all look 64, shot 5 ... so that probably carried it to a 63"


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,467 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Newer holder so my guess is 63, especially with what appears to be nice color. I’m thinking that may have bought some forgiveness from those face marks.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,456 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rough night for Lady Liberty..........I love her even more. ❤️



  • HiBuckyHiBucky Posts: 598 ✭✭✭

    ms -62

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 11, 2024 9:29PM

    @Goldbully said:
    That cheek chatter is disconcerting. MS60+

    That’s not a grade, +’s start at 62.

    If a cheek is bad enough to neg a near gem down to 60 it would just Gen the coin. That isn’t even that bad as far a gold goes, many double eagles have layers of cheek removed from their time spent in heavy bags and still get grades.

    It only looks that bad because the rest of the coins isn’t equally baggy.

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 11, 2024 10:24PM

    This has to be one of those you’re not going to believe they graded it as high as they did coins, no trick to low grade unc. Probably has deer in the headlights blinding luster in hand

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,021 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DrewU said:
    Ms-66…Guessing it is from the infamous 1901 bulk grading/mass hallucination event across the street

    I think this is the answer. Otherwise, 62 seems par for the course.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,228 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62. Any higher grade is overgraded in my opinion.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,228 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @joebb21 said:
    As a disclaimer- remember you all dont see the coin in hand and apparently 3 professional graders who are much smarter and educated than us felt it deserved the given grade

    I thought that the third grader got involved only when the first two graders disagreed on the grade.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • tcollectstcollects Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 no CAC

  • pcgscacgoldpcgscacgold Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    With a face like that I have to say MS62.

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those look more than just luster breaks on the face from sitting in a bag. A few prominent scrapes would probably justify a 62 grade. But grading gold is funny. Here’s a 63+ DE, with luster break on her cheek and face, so I’ll go 63.
    I know it’s like comparing apples to oranges, but…..

  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62+

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-62 to 63. Aside from the rough face, the rest of the coin is fairly smooth.

    The tolerances for marks on these coins has really gotten very high. More than 20 years ago, I had this one graded by NGC. It came back as an MS-65, which was a clear case of overgrading to me. I graded it MS-64. Now it pretty much looks like the other $10 Liberty coins that get the same grade.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • jclovescoinsjclovescoins Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭✭✭

    guessing what they graded it since you're asking? 65 or 66
    probably should grade 61-62 lol

  • SurfinxHISurfinxHI Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Dead people tell interesting tales.
  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would give it a 62+ because of how nice the strike and luster are. That said, it is nowhere near to a 66, which I fear may be its assigned grade.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,410 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 12, 2024 10:57AM

    @Goldbully said:
    Rough night for Lady Liberty..........I love her even more. ❤️



    @Goldbully said:
    Rough night for Lady Liberty..........I love her even more. ❤️



    @Goldbully said:
    Rough night for Lady Liberty..........I love her even more. ❤️



    God love her ♥️ ill go ms 63 as well

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,538 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62.

  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My grade...61
    TPG grade... 63 or if it was on a Friday, 64


    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,654 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62 here.

  • scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The fields look really nice and the luster looks ok. I am guessing they gave a pass on the chewed up cheek and gave it a 63.

  • hickoryridgehickoryridge Posts: 236 ✭✭✭

    unc details . scratched

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,416 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @joebb21 said:
    WHO WANTS TO GUESS THE GRADE OF THIS 1901 $10

    Only if we win it! 🤣 😉

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • I'd say MS-63. AHHHHY! 👍👍

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How does that cheek even get past ANYBODY? That is not simple bagging. I will stick at 61 but if my coin would not have sent it off for grading....

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 13, 2024 12:18AM

    Does @Crypto win this MS-63+ 1901 $10 gold coin?

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm gonna go with MS66.

    Coin Photographer.

  • MICHAELDIXONMICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,516 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62

    Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 3-5, 2025 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • dhikewhitneydhikewhitney Posts: 465 ✭✭✭✭

    63, no CAC

  • I’ll guess CAC because “3 professional graders” and 63 because it’s not.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file