Yes. Despite what the highest point looks like (which may have taken a hit of some kind), the "chip" area blends into the field in such a way that it is "as struck" in that respect, where a die chip seems the only logical conclusion from here.
.
And as the previous posters said ... FANTASTIC images!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Take a toothpick and see if it goes under the spur. If it does, metal was pushed off the top of the numeral . If so, break it off with the toothpick because it is detracting.
Great images. What equipment are you using? Electron microscope? Let's please see more!
From the second set of photos, I would say that is not a die chip but minute damage.
What are you using to take these pictures as they are all the best closeups that I have seen on this forum?
Nicely done.
Wayne
@WAYNEAS said:
From the second set of photos, I would say that is not a die chip but minute damage.
What are you using to take these pictures as they are all the best closeups that I have seen on this forum?
Nicely done.
Wayne
Thanks!
Sony a7r II and Mitakon 4.5x Mag. And 32mm extension.
Comments
No idea but that is a talented photo right there.
I am not sure anyone has ever viewed a potential die chip that closely. Incredible photography
Yes. Despite what the highest point looks like (which may have taken a hit of some kind), the "chip" area blends into the field in such a way that it is "as struck" in that respect, where a die chip seems the only logical conclusion from here.
.
And as the previous posters said ... FANTASTIC images!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Outstanding photos!
Looks like it may be a small die gouge but if not it's a chip.
Take a toothpick and see if it goes under the spur. If it does, metal was pushed off the top of the numeral . If so, break it off with the toothpick because it is detracting.
Great images. What equipment are you using? Electron microscope? Let's please see more!
The coin also shows some light MachineDamage Doubling.
http://macrocoins.com
Agree with others, not a die chip but damage from a hit that has moved the metal.
There is an angled gap underneath from side pic view.
STUNNING!! We're getting into the scanning electron microscope realm. 👍
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
Fantastic photo. For me,think it's the best ever posted.
If there's a gap underneath, it's just damage to the coin.
@KiwiNumi He who laughs last, laughs best. Toothpicks are a great tool to have when examining coins.
Outstanding images!
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Your photography is superb. Yes, it seems to be chip.
Do you see all the cracks in the metal next to the movement? Die chips don't have an undercut either. I vote micro damage - again.
OP, what equipment are you using to make the image?
I’ve posted my setup before. But, with the latest pics, I’ve added a 32mm extension.
Sony a7r II and Mitakon 4.5x Mag. And 32mm extension.
Looks like damage to the coin.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
From the second set of photos, I would say that is not a die chip but minute damage.
What are you using to take these pictures as they are all the best closeups that I have seen on this forum?
Nicely done.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
In stereo as well, coool
Thanks!
Sony a7r II and Mitakon 4.5x Mag. And 32mm extension.
Amazing photos.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc