Home U.S. Coin Forum

Grade on this 1899 G$10?

AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

This is like an MS-62 at best, right?


Comments

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 949 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My kind of look

  • AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dcarr said:
    MS-62 appears reasonable.
    MS-63 is a possibility, but in-hand examination is necessary for such a distinction.

    It's in a PCGS 64 OGH. Yikes 😐

    This coin is like the physical embodiment of the phrase "buy the coin, not the holder".

  • AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RobertScotLover said:
    My kind of look

    Yeah, in general I think it's a nice coin. It's pretty pleasing but it is in a PCGS OGH graded MS-64.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,231 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If PCGS called it a 64, it probably has blast luster that isn't showing up in your pics. Or, perhaps PCGS was in generous mood that day. Looks like a 63 to me from your pics.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • pcgscacgoldpcgscacgold Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It does not appear to be a 62 from the photos. Easy 63 or 63+, and that die crack on the reverse is outstanding.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,053 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks like an MS-63 to me, but times are changing. Twenty + years ago I had the type piece I bought in high school graded by NGC. I expected an MS-64, but it came back in an MS-65 holder. I viewed that as a “C graded coin,” but today it’s about the same as the other MS-65 graded pieces I see offered.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,656 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 is a stretch for me.

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was at 63, with maybe a shot higher due to some things that look like they are on the slab and not on the coin ... and I agree with @pcgscacgold .... that is a cool reverse die crack


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "In the holder", in its plastic tomb and final resting place.

  • AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    If PCGS called it a 64, it probably has blast luster that isn't showing up in your pics. Or, perhaps PCGS was in generous mood that day. Looks like a 63 to me from your pics.

    Thank you. I wanna get back into grading raw gold again and your opinion really helps.

  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rev is super fun. I love die cracks in gold.

  • AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cladiator said:
    Rev is super fun. I love die cracks in gold.

    Someone just posted this 1852 G$2.5 on reddit.


Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file