Home U.S. Coin Forum

1933 Saint-Gaudens Double Eagles. Where are they?

ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,778 ✭✭✭✭

I should know the answer to this, but I've not been keeping up to date on recent numismatic happenings.

Outside of the Smithsonian, how many 1933 Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle are in collector's hands today? I'm not sure how many the government has confiscated and if they are still intact.

Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
«134

Comments

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 863 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is the public answer and then there is the no so public answer with a pretty significant spread between them, and then there is the truth somewhere in the middle

  • RexfordRexford Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What happens if one of these is sold/owned outside of the US? Does a foreign auction house have free reign to sell one?

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Besides Elite's coin, I knew of another one that was privately owned, but it was subsequently surrendered ro the feds in exchange for some type of tax write-off. I think the gov't has a dozen or so by now.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In addition to the the ex Farouk piece in private hands, i think there could be a whole bag of '33's, face value $5000 that was stolen. When the great melt of 1933 Double Eagles happened in 1937, there could have been a bag of 1928's mixed in with the 1933's to be melted. The '28's came from a theft of a bag of 250 of them, face value $5000, from the Mint's vaults sometime prior to 1937 but after 1933.

    The crime was never solved.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • MartinMartin Posts: 930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:
    In addition to the the ex Farouk piece in private hands, i think there could be a whole bag of '33's, face value $5000 that was stolen. When the great melt of 1933 Double Eagles happened in 1937, there could have been a bag of 1928's mixed in with the 1933's to be melted. The '28's came from a theft of a bag of 250 of them, face value $5000, from the Mint's vaults sometime prior to 1937 but after 1933.

    The crime was never solved.

    What make you think the person (s) that stole the 28s traded them for 33s?

    Martin

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 5, 2024 10:39PM

    @Martin said:

    @mr1931S said:
    In addition to the the ex Farouk piece in private hands, i think there could be a whole bag of '33's, face value $5000 that was stolen. When the great melt of 1933 Double Eagles happened in 1937, there could have been a bag of 1928's mixed in with the 1933's to be melted. The '28's came from a theft of a bag of 250 of them, face value $5000, from the Mint's vaults sometime prior to 1937 but after 1933.

    The crime was never solved.

    What make you think the person (s) that stole the 28s traded them for 33s?

    Martin

    To my knowledge, there’s never been any indication or even a hint that any such thing ever occurred regarding additional 1933 Saints. That’s pure unsupported speculation.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 5, 2024 11:24PM

    @Martin said:

    @mr1931S said:
    In addition to the the ex Farouk piece in private hands, i think there could be a whole bag of '33's, face value $5000 that was stolen. When the great melt of 1933 Double Eagles happened in 1937, there could have been a bag of 1928's mixed in with the 1933's to be melted. The '28's came from a theft of a bag of 250 of them, face value $5000, from the Mint's vaults sometime prior to 1937 but after 1933.

    The crime was never solved.

    What make you think the person (s) that stole the 28s traded them for 33s?

    Martin

    The timing of the theft of the '28s ( a major theft that shockingly was not vigorously investigated as to who did it) relative to the timing of the melting of the '33s is suspect. The government declared that no 1933 gold was found to be missing after the great melt in '37. Of course there wasn't any gold found missing from 1933 DE production. The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault. My belief is that Switt acquired the 1933 dated pieces (about 20) that he did around 1936 and they were part of a larger group that had been stolen from the mint earlier. Where the rest of the '33s that escaped the melting pot are or what happened with them is anybody's guess.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 7, 2024 4:10AM

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 6, 2024 4:14AM

    @mr1931S said:
    In addition to the the ex Farouk piece in private hands, i think there could be a whole bag of '33's, face value $5000 that was stolen. When the great melt of 1933 Double Eagles happened in 1937, there could have been a bag of 1928's mixed in with the 1933's to be melted. The '28's came from a theft of a bag of 250 of them, face value $5000, from the Mint's vaults sometime prior to 1937 but after 1933.

    The crime was never solved.

    They also could have stolen all of them and replaced them with British sovereigns. But there is zero evidence of it. They might also have stolen a bag of 1913 Liberty nickels and replaced them with Buffs. Oooo... and maybe they struck a bag of 1933 doubled die Lincolns that are just waiting to be found.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 6, 2024 4:13AM

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 eagles and get some needed cash for the treasury

    They could make more money by simply striking half dollars and stacking them in a vault.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,556 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on what your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

    The bags would have been all one date when struck. See GSA Morgans.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,364 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on what your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

    The bags would have been all one date when struck. See GSA Morgans.

    I understand that. But once the solid-date bags of DEs were loaded into the vault, did the Mint or Treasury segregate the coins (bags) by date? I assume they just cared about how many in total were there.

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,067 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on what your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

    The bags would have been all one date when struck. See GSA Morgans.

    I understand that. But once the solid-date bags of DEs were loaded into the vault, did the Mint or Treasury segregate the coins (bags) by date? I assume they just cared about how many in total were there.

    Would depend upon how the bags were marked. Did a new empty bag just have 250 double eagles printed on it with actual ID being made by a tag indicating the year. If the tag said 1933 they assumed the coins inside were 1933 so they never opened the bag to verify the contents. I expect that they threw the bags in too in order to capture any gold dust.

    theknowitalltroll;
  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

  • lermishlermish Posts: 2,714 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    I'm really disappointed to not see you post some version of this meme here.

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    Not 5,000 coins. $5,000 face value, or 250 coins.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    I'm really disappointed to not see you post some version of this meme here.

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!

    @CaptHenway said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    Not 5,000 coins. $5,000 face value, or 250 coins.

    I'm clearly off my game this morning. I need more coffee.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on what your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

    As I understand the Mint's allegations, the 1933 $20's were struck, counted, bagged and stored pending testing of a sample of the coinage batch by the Mint Lab as to weight and, more importantly, fineness. This was apparently routine procedure for all precious metal coinage batches from all mints.

    Until the batch was approved and released, they would not have been stored with the general population of coins ready for shipment to a Federal Reserve Bank, lest they be accidentally shipped out before release. This implies storage in a separate vault for a while in 1933. Allegedly while they were thus on hold awaiting testing, the decision was made not to release any gold coins for other reasons.

    Of course, this decision not to release was not an order to melt them. and once the Mint Lab finished their testing there is no reason why the 1933 coins could not have been put in the general population pending decisions as to what to do with the gold inventory. Whether this mixing of the 1933's with the general population ever took place I do not know, and I don't think the Mint ever told.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:

    @lermish said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    I'm really disappointed to not see you post some version of this meme here.

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!

    @CaptHenway said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    Not 5,000 coins. $5,000 face value, or 250 coins.

    I'm clearly off my game this morning. I need more coffee.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,556 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    I'm really disappointed to not see you post some version of this meme here.

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!

    There's still time

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @lermish said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    It doesn't seem plausible that someone would drag a 5000 coin DE bag into the treasury vault and swap it out for another one.

    I'm really disappointed to not see you post some version of this meme here.

    Oh how the mighty have fallen!

    There's still time

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is the Farouk example that was legitimated by the federal government and is in private hands. As to the rest, we will likely never know as no one wants to be Langborded.

  • MartinMartin Posts: 930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S
    What time frame was the bag of 28’s stolen or first found missing?

    A time line of events would be nice

    Also you believe Izzy didn’t get his 33’s form the vault teller?

    Thanks
    Martin

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 6, 2024 8:04PM

    @JBK said:

    @mr1931S said:

    The stolen 1933 pieces had been replaced with coins from the theft of a bag of common '28s from the Mint vault.

    I'm still not clear on what your scenario.

    You almost make it sound like two bags were "stolen" but it seems that one bag of 1928 was stolen and substituted for a bag of 1933. Or, just one bag of 1933 was really stolen and the 1928 was just shuffled around inside the vault to cover their tracks.

    In any case, did the Mint or Treasury really segregate coins by date once they went into inventory? The 1933 DEs weren't issued, but they were all illegal to own/issue soon enough (except for exempted gold coins already in private hands, of course). When it came to melting, did they really care what dates they were?

    An entire bag of Double Eagles most likely coins dated 1928 was stolen from the Mint's vaults. See David Tripp's book for details about this story. The Mint held Double Eagles, presumably all that were ever made, bearing the date 1933 were not melted until 1937. Did officials check each and every coin for it's date as the coins went into the melting pot? A whole bag of non 1933 dated pieces substituted for 1933 dated coins that had been spirited out of the Mint could easily be slipped into the melting pot so that no gold would be determined to be missing from 1933 production. The theft of the bag of non 1933 dated DE's from a Mint storage vault is a crime that has never been solved.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 590 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Amazing to me the Langbord’s came out with 11 examples.
    I think I would have brought out two. If the government somehow made them legal, then there would only be a population of 3 total, still making them very, very rare and valuable!
    If they confiscated them, well I would still have 9 to play around with, give to friends, etc.😉😂

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,216 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 6, 2024 8:28PM

    @HillbillyCollector said:
    Amazing to me the Langbord’s came out with 11 examples.
    I think I would have brought out two. If the government somehow made them legal, then there would only be a population of 3 total, still making them very, very rare and valuable!
    If they confiscated them, well I would still have 9 to play around with, give to friends, etc.😉😂

    She kept the other 10 in the original roll. :smile:

  • CopperLadCopperLad Posts: 47 ✭✭

    I have often wondered what the market price is for the Secret 1933’s.
    10% of the Farouk 1933? 50%?
    Selling into a small market, but million dollar coins always sell into a small market.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :o:o > @jmlanzaf said:

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 ea> @HillbillyCollector said:

    Amazing to me the Langbord’s came out with 11 examples.
    I think I would have brought out two. If the government somehow made them legal, then there would only be a population of 3 total, still making them very, very rare and valuable!
    If they confiscated them, well I would still have 9 to play around with, give to friends, etc.😉😂

    There were 10, not 11, unless you know something the rest of us don’t.😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CopperLad said:
    I have often wondered what the market price is for the Secret 1933’s.
    10% of the Farouk 1933? 50%?
    Selling into a small market, but million dollar coins always sell into a small market.

    A government attorney who helped craft the deal for the ex Farouk '33 to be legally owned is on the record as saying the ex Farouk coin will forever be the only 1933 Double Eagle legal to own privately. The government is now in possession of twelve 1933 Double Eagles and it looks a lot like none of them will ever be sold. Ever.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,375 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 eagles and get some needed cash for the treasury

    Small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.

    ONE legal coin is a $10M coin.
    ELEVEN legal coins are $500K coins.

    $5M is nothing to the USG.

    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @CopperLad said:
    I have often wondered what the market price is for the Secret 1933’s.
    10% of the Farouk 1933? 50%?
    Selling into a small market, but million dollar coins always sell into a small market.

    A government attorney who helped craft the deal for the ex Farouk '33 to be legally owned is on the record as saying the ex Farouk coin will forever be the only 1933 Double Eagle legal to own privately. The government is now in possession of twelve 1933 Double Eagles and it looks a lot like none of them will ever be sold. Ever.

    Was the legalized 1933 ever confirmed to be the Farouk example?

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 7, 2024 7:59AM

    @BStrauss3 said:

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 eagles and get some needed cash for the treasury

    Small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.

    ONE legal coin is a $10M coin.
    ELEVEN legal coins are $500K coins.

    $5M is nothing to the USG.

    Agreed about small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.

    However, ONE legal coin is quite a bit more than $10,000,000 unless its value takes a large drop from its previous sale. And based on the prices obtained for other highly publicized rarities with populations similar to “ELEVEN”, $500,000 is way too low. I think they’d bring a minimum of four to five times that amount.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 7, 2024 8:11AM

    I think the government should back off a bit from their "never" position and let loose of the only circulated 1933 DE they have in their possession. It's graded as NGC About Uncirculated and most probably was I. Switt's pocket piece, the '33 DE piece that he would show off to good friends and customers who visited his shop.

    Of course, if that were to happen it would only be a matter of time before the gov would be looking at a lawsuit filed by the owner of the ex Farouk piece. Instead of a lawsuit, however, if it was up to me as an authorized government representative, I would offer the ex Farouk piece owner this deal, a trade:

    Give up the ex Farouk piece in exchange for the finest known 1933 DE, an NGC 65 that was part of the Langbord holdings.

    The owner of the ex Farouk piece would get the finest known 1933 DE and someone else would be able to acquire the worst known 1933 DE, the personal pocket piece of I. Switt.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @BStrauss3 said:

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 eagles and get some needed cash for the treasury

    Small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.

    ONE legal coin is a $10M coin.
    ELEVEN legal coins are $500K coins.

    $5M is nothing to the USG.

    Agreed about small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.

    However, ONE legal coin is quite a bit more than $10,000,000 unless its value takes a large drop from its previous sale. And based on the prices obtained for other highly publicized rarities with populations similar to “ELEVEN”, $500,000 is way too low. I think they’d bring a minimum of four to five times that amount.

    Agreed. A government sanctioned 1933 $20 (in a slab with an "ex-Langbord Pedigree" just to be schmucks!) auction would sell for $2M minimum, possibly $3M for the nicest one.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 7, 2024 9:17AM

    @mr1931S said:
    I think the government should back off a bit from their "never" position and let loose of the only circulated 1933 DE they have in their possession. It's graded as NGC About Uncirculated and most probably was I. Switt's pocket piece, the '33 DE piece that he would show off to good friends and customers who visited his shop.

    Of course, if that were to happen it would only be a matter of time before the gov would be looking at a lawsuit filed by the owner of the ex Farouk piece. Instead of a lawsuit, however, if it was up to me as an authorized government representative, I would offer the ex Farouk piece owner this deal, a trade:

    Give up the ex Farouk piece in exchange for the finest known 1933 DE, an NGC 65 that was part of the Langbord holdings.

    The owner of the ex Farouk piece would get the finest known 1933 DE and someone else would be able to acquire the worst known 1933 DE, the personal pocket piece of I. Switt.

    The “ex Farouk” coin has already been graded 65 by PCGS and verified by CAC. And even if it hadn’t been, I believe that due to its history, it would be more valuable than any other example. So there wouldn’t be any incentive for its owner to make your proposed trade.

    Edited to add: Additionally, Coin World had reported that NGC graded two of the Langbord 1933 Saints MS65 and one, MS66.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DeplorableDan said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @CopperLad said:
    I have often wondered what the market price is for the Secret 1933’s.
    10% of the Farouk 1933? 50%?
    Selling into a small market, but million dollar coins always sell into a small market.

    A government attorney who helped craft the deal for the ex Farouk '33 to be legally owned is on the record as saying the ex Farouk coin will forever be the only 1933 Double Eagle legal to own privately. The government is now in possession of twelve 1933 Double Eagles and it looks a lot like none of them will ever be sold. Ever.

    Was the legalized 1933 ever confirmed to be the Farouk example?

    The below copied portion of the auction lot description provides what looks to be very strong circumstantial evidence that the legalized example is the Farouk coin. Link to the entire description:
    https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2021/three-treasures-collected-by-stuart-weitzman/the-1933-double-eagle

    “ THE ONE
    The Jeweler from Cairo

    FACADE OF STEPHEN FENTON’S KNIGHTSBRIDGE COINS SHOP, LONDON, ENGLAND (CREDIT: DAVID TRIPP)
    In early 1994, a young Egyptian jeweler, whose family had been in business in Cairo for generations, was introduced to London coin dealer André de Clermont and began selling him some remarkable coins. De Clermont, in turn, began to work with another London dealer, Stephen Fenton.

    Throughout 1994 and 1995, the two dealers purchased some two hundred coins which were of uniformly high quality and, on occasion, of significant rarity. De Clermont’s educated guess that “such good coins coming out of Egypt” must have emanated from Farouk’s collection56 was confirmed by the jeweler, who explained, “he got them from the children of one of the colonels with Nasser and that this man, who was now dead . . . had acquired a great many coins from the Farouk sale.”57 Fenton and de Clermont delved into the Farouk catalogue and positively identified fifty separate lots they had jointly purchased.

    "WONDERFUL"
    “Well, if it comes, it will come,” was the jeweler’s reply to de Clermont casually mentioning that Farouk had once owned a 1933 Double Eagle. In the late summer of 1995, de Clermont called Fenton with the news that the 1933 Double Eagle was in London. “It was the most amazing feeling I’ve ever had with a coin,” Fenton recalled, and described the first time he held the 1933 Double Eagle in a word: “Wonderful.”58

    The jeweler asked $325,000: not cheap. Patiently, Fenton negotiated the price down to $210,000, with an additional $10,000 for other coins in the transaction. On October 3, 1995, the funds were wired from Fenton’s account to the jeweler’s.59 What next?”

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,138 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerlover said:
    I don’t understand why the government doesn’t just sell their 1933 eagles and get some needed cash for the treasury

    That's to easy 🥴

  • CopperLadCopperLad Posts: 47 ✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @CopperLad said:
    I have often wondered what the market price is for the Secret 1933’s.
    10% of the Farouk 1933? 50%?
    Selling into a small market, but million dollar coins always sell into a small market.

    A government attorney who helped craft the deal for the ex Farouk '33 to be legally owned is on the record as saying the ex Farouk coin will forever be the only 1933 Double Eagle legal to own privately. The government is now in possession of twelve 1933 Double Eagles and it looks a lot like none of them will ever be sold. Ever.

    I hope the coins held by the government eventually do hit the market. Seasons change.
    I still wonder what the price is for any unknown 1933’s.
    After I win the lottery, I might find out.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 8, 2024 5:19AM

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:
    I think the government should back off a bit from their "never" position and let loose of the only circulated 1933 DE they have in their possession. It's graded as NGC About Uncirculated and most probably was I. Switt's pocket piece, the '33 DE piece that he would show off to good friends and customers who visited his shop.

    Of course, if that were to happen it would only be a matter of time before the gov would be looking at a lawsuit filed by the owner of the ex Farouk piece. Instead of a lawsuit, however, if it was up to me as an authorized government representative, I would offer the ex Farouk piece owner this deal, a trade:

    Give up the ex Farouk piece in exchange for the finest known 1933 DE, an NGC 65 that was part of the Langbord holdings.

    The owner of the ex Farouk piece would get the finest known 1933 DE and someone else would be able to acquire the worst known 1933 DE, the personal pocket piece of I. Switt.

    The “ex Farouk” coin has already been graded 65 by PCGS and verified by CAC. And even if it hadn’t been, I believe that due to its history, it would be more valuable than any other example. So there wouldn’t be any incentive for its owner to make your proposed trade.

    Edited to add: Additionally, Coin World had reported that NGC graded two of the Langbord 1933 Saints MS65 and one, MS66.

    The ex Farouk piece is inferior to the nicest piece that NGC graded is the point. And really, how can anyone know that the only 1933 DE that is legal to own was actually owned by Farouk? Are there any photographs or is there videos in existence of King Farouk showing off his 1933 so we can be certain of it's provenance? No, there are not.

    The gov could allow the "ex Farouk" owner his choice of which ever '33 DE suits his fancy. Lawsuit avoided and the historic Switt pocket piece hits the market, for sale to the highest bidder.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,223 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:
    I think the government should back off a bit from their "never" position and let loose of the only circulated 1933 DE they have in their possession. It's graded as NGC About Uncirculated and most probably was I. Switt's pocket piece, the '33 DE piece that he would show off to good friends and customers who visited his shop.

    Of course, if that were to happen it would only be a matter of time before the gov would be looking at a lawsuit filed by the owner of the ex Farouk piece. Instead of a lawsuit, however, if it was up to me as an authorized government representative, I would offer the ex Farouk piece owner this deal, a trade:

    Give up the ex Farouk piece in exchange for the finest known 1933 DE, an NGC 65 that was part of the Langbord holdings.

    The owner of the ex Farouk piece would get the finest known 1933 DE and someone else would be able to acquire the worst known 1933 DE, the personal pocket piece of I. Switt.

    The “ex Farouk” coin has already been graded 65 by PCGS and verified by CAC. And even if it hadn’t been, I believe that due to its history, it would be more valuable than any other example. So there wouldn’t be any incentive for its owner to make your proposed trade.

    Edited to add: Additionally, Coin World had reported that NGC graded two of the Langbord 1933 Saints MS65 and one, MS66.

    The ex Farouk piece is inferior to the nicest piece that NGC graded is the point. And really, how can anyone know that the only 1933 DE that is legal to own was actually owned by Farouk? Are there any photographs or is there videos in existence of King Farouk showing off his 1933 so we can be certain of it's provenance? No, there are not.

    The gov could allow the "ex Farouk" owner his choice of which ever '33 DE suits his fancy. Lawsuit avoided and the historic Switt pocket piece hits the market, for sale to the highest bidder.

    Best of luck to you in your dealmaking attempt.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 8, 2024 5:32AM

    If the deal I propose could actually happen, it might open the door for the gov to lighten up on it's "never" position with regard to it's 1933 DE's. More letting go of '33 DE's could follow, in other words.

    The owner's selected coin would probably get a "67" by a TPG, making it indeed, "Finest known."

    Somebody tell me I'm wrong. >:)

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 8, 2024 5:39AM

    The ex Farouk piece cannot be called "finest known" simply because it isn't. At this time,the government owns the finest known 1933 DE. Sadly, that's a fact.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file