Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG 1924 Buffalo grade posted!

ad4400ad4400 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 30, 2024 6:13AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I’ve had this one stored away for a bit, waiting for my CU membership to renew for a trip to our hosts. With the state of Truviews, I decided to get my images done elsewhere. Last thing I want is this piece to be represented as some gold hued toner. What grade do you see this piece?

Comments

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,948 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-65+. It is close to MS-66 or higher, especially because of the sharp strike. There are a number of small spots, however, which pull it down.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 29, 2024 5:33AM

    66+
    Edited to add: Whatever the grade, that’s a very attractive example!

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can't grade buffalo nickels but I will say that is a very nice coin. PQ

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

    Mr_Spud

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • 1Bufffan1Bufffan Posts: 641 ✭✭✭

    Range of 65-66 Great looking Buff, I wonder how many Buffs that were put away like yours are still out there?

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1. It would be higher if not for the spots.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those few tiny spots should not downgrade the coin to anything lower than a 66, considering the lovely luster and decent strike. So 66.

  • Jacques_LoungecoqueJacques_Loungecoque Posts: 733 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

    Having fun while switching things up and focusing on a next level PCGS slabbed 1950+ type set, while still looking for great examples for the 7070.

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Incomplete top feather. Seems like that's more common for this year. 24-D is especially bad.

    MS-65

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,263 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 29, 2024 9:02AM

    Late state dies, some minor spotting, I would call it MS65 but P market grades and loves luster so I'd guess MS66 from there. Good call on getting the photos done elsewhere, hopefully P doesn't force you to upgrade to gold shield and do TV's anyway.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,499 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65.

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66 and beautiful!

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65+; nice one!

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jfriedm56 said:
    Those few tiny spots should not downgrade the coin to anything lower than a 66, considering the lovely luster and decent strike. So 66.

    Agree with this^

  • VetterVetter Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66 based on the pictures.

    Members I have done business with:
    Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
  • Black.DiamondBlack.Diamond Posts: 113 ✭✭✭

    Very nice buffalo. My guess is 66.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,643 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 29, 2024 4:41PM

    I saw some beautiful 67+ Buffalo’s at the show this weekend and kind of wish I would’ve bought one of them.

    66+

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,473 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A very nice example, I'll go 66. Strike is pretty nice too.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • ad4400ad4400 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 29, 2024 5:26PM

    Thanks to everyone for offering opinions. The spots were of no great concerns when in hand .

    The coin is currently in a yellow ANACS 64 holder and feel like everyone else it is undergraded. I can see it as a 66 and would be profoundly disappointed if it didn’t upgrade to at least 65. The coin is a total luster bomb free of any meaningful hits and has a decent strike. It is a bit whiter than image portrays which usually isn’t my thing, but I find attractive in this instance. It is later die state but that should not impact grade and if anything adds some character for me.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file