Home U.S. Coin Forum

Wow! Quarter looks like gold!

Comments

  • KurisuKurisu Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Last year I got a couple nice rolls of Kennedys from someone at the Denver Coin Club with some beautiful gold toning on the enders...but nothing like that quarter!

    Also a bunch of my Westward Journey nickels U.S. Mint rolls have toned a truly beautiful gold on some of the enders.





    Coins are Neato!

    "If it's a penny for your thoughts and you put in your two cents worth, then someone...somewhere...is making a penny." - Steven Wright

  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 362 ✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    1970 quarter overstruck on an 1898 $5 – how does something like that happen? Is this one of those notorious instances of mint shenanigans?

    Super cool, regardless.

  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wonder how much that 1970 gold quarter sold for? That's truly rare. is it intentional made?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,116 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 4, 2024 2:38PM

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    That gold quarter is amazing Mike! Glad it has your pedigree!

    It belongs in a top set of Washington Quarters!

  • FloridafacelifterFloridafacelifter Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 940 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jt88 said:
    Wonder how much that 1970 gold quarter sold for? That's truly rare. is it intentional made?

    How could it not be, do you see what it was struck over?

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 3,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks beautiful. It's toned and not plated?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,116 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,116 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

    I currently have it in my collection.

    Congrats! It's a beautiful coin!

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,131 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is that 1970 quarter struck on an 1898 half eagle really a true "mint error" or was it a "piece de caprice" intentionally fabricated by a dishonest mint employee?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

    I currently have it in my collection.

    He purchased it in the NGC slab and now it’s in a PCGS holder.

    Amazing unique coin!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,116 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 4, 2024 2:52PM

    @Byers said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

    I currently have it in my collection.

    He purchased it in the NGC slab and now it’s in a PCGS holder.

    Amazing unique coin!

    Very nice. It's great to see it with a TrueView!

    Would have been great to have a PhotoVision too :)

  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

    I currently have it in my collection.

    He purchased it in the NGC slab and now it’s in a PCGS holder.

    Amazing unique coin!

    Its truly amazing that such coin exists! How can a 1898 $5 Liberty be used to strike a 1970S Washington quarter??? It can't be intentionally so what mint employee did this behind the backs of the mint? Also, I can't tell from the picture that it was a 1898 Liberty. Mike - would love to have lunch with you to discuss errors - used to collect them but moved on as I just couldn't put a story to the coin - but cool looking......

    Easton Collection
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @EastonCollection said:

    @Byers said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Floridafacelifter said:

    @Byers said:
    Nice gold toning on it, but here is the only gold Washington Quarter known!

    Nice to see the TrueView!

    Do you know who owns this now?

    I currently have it in my collection.

    He purchased it in the NGC slab and now it’s in a PCGS holder.

    Amazing unique coin!

    Its truly amazing that such coin exists! How can a 1898 $5 Liberty be used to strike a 1970S Washington quarter??? It can't be intentionally so what mint employee did this behind the backs of the mint? Also, I can't tell from the picture that it was a 1898 Liberty. Mike - would love to have lunch with you to discuss errors - used to collect them but moved on as I just couldn't put a story to the coin - but cool looking......

    The 1898 date is on the reverse above ‘Quarter Dollar’

    Here is a link to the coin on my site when it was for sale in the NGC holder:

    https://mikebyers.com/unique-gold-quarter.html

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks Mike for the info. Again very cool!

    Easton Collection
  • sellitstoresellitstore Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not sure why you'd fabricate an error like this and leave a large fingerprint on it. Carelessness.

    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:

    @Onastone said:
    Looks beautiful. It's toned and not plated?

    Toned per our hosts!

    That looks better than a 67.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 6, 2024 8:16AM

    @CRHer700 said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Onastone said:
    Looks beautiful. It's toned and not plated?

    Toned per our hosts!

    That looks better than a 67.

    Hey @Zoins , that agree you just gave me made me a five star member at 722 posts! Thanks!
    Now I'm at exactly 1/49.809 of @ricko 's points! At this rate, I'll have to reach around 36,000 posts to beat his record.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭✭

    @CRHer700 said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Onastone said:
    Looks beautiful. It's toned and not plated?

    Toned per our hosts!

    That looks better than a 67.

    Much better than a 67....

    imageimage

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have submitted numerous proof coins dated from 1950 to 1970 recently. They are hand picked; and mostly high quality, eye appealing coins with minimal flaws. Most of them have frosted devices and mirrored fields. Some of them received a Cameo designation.

    Very few of these coins graded PF 68 or higher. Some of them graded PF67 and looking at them I can see nothing that limits the coins to a 67 grade.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,131 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I had a Jefferson nickel PF68 that looked almost exactly like it, but it was more of an orange gold color. Sold it a couple years back.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 7, 2024 6:28AM

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    The top of Washington's head is suspicious.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Let's be realistic about the 1970, there's no logical explanation for how it was legitimately struck on a gold coin from some 80 years earlier. To be plain, the coin is a fabrication. PCGS, at least in this case, should have made a reasonable assumption and not encapsulated the coin.

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,980 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Maywood said:
    Let's be realistic about the 1970, there's no logical explanation for how it was legitimately struck on a gold coin from some 80 years earlier. To be plain, the coin is a fabrication. PCGS, at least in this case, should have made a reasonable assumption and not encapsulated the coin.

    Yes, it is a Mint Made fabrication. It isn't PCGS's job to deferentiate between what is Mint fabricated and that which is "accidental". As long as it was produced at the mint, it should be encapsulated. Otherwise you go down a long road with many other coins in the path of determination. Let the buyer/owner figure out the value once it is slabbed.

    peacockcoins

  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,654 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Some closer views of the golden toned quarter. Color changes around much of periphery. Thin scratch?






    https://youtube.com/watch?v=_KWVk0XeB9o - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Piece Of My Heart
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said: Yes, it is a Mint Made fabrication.

    Since we agree on that, and I'd presume PCGS does as well, what differentiates the coin from a counterfeit?? I see it as a Mint made counterfeit.

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No different than the 1913 Liberty Head Nickel which sells in the millions of dollars.

    ▶️Even the Smithsonian admits that the 1913 Liberty Head Nickel was a ‘scam’ and ‘spirited out of the Mint’!!!!

    https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_835247

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,222 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Maywood said:
    @braddick said: Yes, it is a Mint Made fabrication.

    Since we agree on that, and I'd presume PCGS does as well, what differentiates the coin from a counterfeit?? I see it as a Mint made counterfeit.

    Or, if we want to go a step farther, what differentiates it from a US Mint product that has been altered with a (former) US Mint press? In other words, that 1970 proof "error" Washington quarter is kind of a private, in-house version of a Dan Carr overstrike.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,980 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Maywood said:
    @braddick said: Yes, it is a Mint Made fabrication.

    Since we agree on that, and I'd presume PCGS does as well, what differentiates the coin from a counterfeit??** I see it as a Mint made counterfeit.**

    PCGS doesn't, along with probably a large majority of collectors and dealers.

    peacockcoins

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 7, 2024 12:24PM

    @TomB said:

    @Maywood said:
    @braddick said: Yes, it is a Mint Made fabrication.

    Since we agree on that, and I'd presume PCGS does as well, what differentiates the coin from a counterfeit?? I see it as a Mint made counterfeit.

    Or, if we want to go a step farther, what differentiates it from a US Mint product that has been altered with a (former) US Mint press? In other words, that 1970 proof "error" Washington quarter is kind of a private, in-house version of a Dan Carr overstrike.

    Obviously the market disagrees with you!

    I consigned these 2 to Heritage Auctions:


    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Back in my youth when I was an expert at spray painting bikes, etc. I could have easily done that with a can of Krylon. >:)

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,222 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers of course the market disagrees with me! It always has in cases such as the fantasy 1970-S WQ and that's okay. It's a big market and I don't have to agree with everything the TPGs, other dealers or collectors like or believe. It's all good.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:
    @Byers of course the market disagrees with me! It always has in cases such as the fantasy 1970-S WQ and that's okay. It's a big market and I don't have to agree with everything the TPGs, other dealers or collectors like or believe. It's all good.

    Yes it’s a big market and it’s all good!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,980 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ahhhh. . . man.
    I thought this was going to get into a big 'ol fight but instead you guys decided to be gentlemen and turn this into a respectful disagreement.

    peacockcoins

  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those unique intentionally made coins always sell high in market. These two just sold by SB. The first one both PCGS and NGC did not even want to grade it.


  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jt88 said:
    Those unique intentionally made coins always sell high in market. These two just sold by SB. The first one both PCGS and NGC did not even want to grade it.


    Yes, it’s not just intentionally made U.S. unique mint errors that bring record prices!

    The market is strong for Chinese and Canadian intentionally made pieces as well!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CRHer700 said:

    @CRHer700 said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Onastone said:
    Looks beautiful. It's toned and not plated?

    Toned per our hosts!

    That looks better than a 67.

    Hey @Zoins , that agree you just gave me made me a five star member at 722 posts! Thanks!
    Now I'm at exactly 1/49.809 of @ricko 's points! At this rate, I'll have to reach around 36,000 posts to beat his record.

    You gonna climb Mount Everest too? :wink:

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 3,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Okay, I agree, it doesn't look like toning...more of an even plating...so why would PCGS call it toned??

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 879 ✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:

    @TomB said:
    @Byers of course the market disagrees with me! It always has in cases such as the fantasy 1970-S WQ and that's okay. It's a big market and I don't have to agree with everything the TPGs, other dealers or collectors like or believe. It's all good.

    Yes it’s a big market and it’s all good!

    The difference is there is more mystery mystique and history with the 1913 Nickel. By the way the 1958 Double Die cent is most definitely a mint made shenanigan as how come only 3 are known?

  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 8, 2024 6:45AM

    Zoins mint error threads and Byers's minterrornews are my favor reads. I think every serious collector should has at least couple Mint Error in his collection. I has some in my collection.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,222 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Onastone said:

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Okay, I agree, it doesn't look like toning...more of an even plating...so why would PCGS call it toned??

    PCGS graded it because it isn't plated, it's simply toned a rather uniform gold.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:

    @Onastone said:

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Okay, I agree, it doesn't look like toning...more of an even plating...so why would PCGS call it toned??

    PCGS graded it because it isn't plated, it's simply toned a rather uniform gold.

    It is not even a mint error.

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 3,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:

    @Onastone said:

    @PerryHall said:

    @Zoins said:

    Looks like a very light and thin gold plating to me. I've never seen a coin with natural toning like this where the entire surface is 100% covered with such a uniform gold "toning" color.

    Okay, I agree, it doesn't look like toning...more of an even plating...so why would PCGS call it toned??

    PCGS graded it because it isn't plated, it's simply toned a rather uniform gold.

    Well then, it's amazing for a toned quarter and quite a beautiful standout!! How does a coin tone so perfectly on both sides?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file