Home U.S. Coin Forum

Post a pop 1/0 you own

24

Comments

  • renomedphysrenomedphys Posts: 3,613 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rnkmyer1 said:
    Rick Snow reports the coin below is the toughest in the entire IHC series. I saw a XF45 years ago that was not designated. This one’s the only MS example known @ 64RB.


    Bro! The 7 touches 1! Yes, that IS the toughest in the whole series. I have never even seen one.

  • Davidk7Davidk7 Posts: 335 ✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @Davidk7 said:

    First PO1 1876-S Trade Dollar. Bought raw on eBay and graded in September.

    My first thought would have been: to much meat on that bone. But what do I know. Congratulation! Nice snag!! 👍🏻

    If it makes you feel better I expected a FR02 :D

    Collector of Capped Bust Halves, SLQ's, Commems, and random cool stuff! @davidv_numismatics on Instagram

  • joeykoinsjoeykoins Posts: 16,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a coin but how bout Currency?
    Just bought this yesterday!
    1935E Silver Certificate "Gutter Fold" Error.
    PCGS F15 Graded.
    POP 1




    "Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!

    --- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.
  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rnkmyer1 said:
    Anyone who has the good fortune to own one knows what a special feeling it gives. I just acquired this one from the legendary Stewart Blay’s GC auction.

    Ken,

    Your’s is extremely beautiful and has PL surfaces. The die crack from 6:00 to 3:00 is a marker for a group of 1857 FE’s that have PL surfaces.

    Doug
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DMWJR: good info Doug. I’ve noted a similar crack on a handful of 1858 LL’s that were considered PL years ago. Didn’t know that about 1857….

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian

  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, you are correct. Those 1858 LL’s are really beautiful too! There was a hoard of those 1858’s that came from the NE. The most PL 1857’s I ever saw were a couple of S-1’s that had a lot of die polishing.

    Doug
  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @joeykoins said:
    Not a coin but how bout Currency?
    Just bought this yesterday!
    1935E Silver Certificate "Gutter Fold" Error.
    PCGS F15 Graded.
    POP 1




    Lets go @Joeykoins! Great error! :)

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DMWJR said:
    From the recent Blay auctions:

    MS67 1/0

    Can you explain this to me? What does 1/0 mean to you?

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well, all I can say is I made a mistake on the post mr. @oakstar. If you want to roast me for that, sobeit. I don’t answer baited hypotheticals, and you know the answer to your own question anyway.

    Doug
  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DMWJR said:
    Well, all I can say is I made a mistake on the post mr. @oakstar. If you want to roast me for that, sobeit. I don’t answer baited hypotheticals, and you know the answer to your own question anyway.

    I'm not criticizing your mistake. I don't care about your mistake. I'm not playing games here. I'm asking you a legitimate question. I don't know the answer. I'm asking you your opinion.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • robecrobec Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    I am assuming for this thread when Matt is asking for pop 1/0 coins he is referring to pop 1 coins with none graded higher in their designated group, be it Cameo, Deep , Cameo, RD, RB, BN, FB, etc.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,678 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Some incredible coins showing up here but this one leaves me blank.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    Got it. That's the reality check I was looking for. Thanks @robec

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    I am assuming for this thread when Matt is asking for pop 1/0 coins he is referring to pop 1 coins with none graded higher in their designated group, be it Cameo, Deep , Cameo, RD, RB, BN, FB, etc.

    Maybe the confusion was created since the first coin posted in this thread is a 2/0.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny010 said:

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    I am assuming for this thread when Matt is asking for pop 1/0 coins he is referring to pop 1 coins with none graded higher in their designated group, be it Cameo, Deep , Cameo, RD, RB, BN, FB, etc.

    Maybe the confusion was created since the first coin posted in this thread is a 2/0.

    It can be a bit confusing. Plus, the added + and CAC grading. I've compared pop/census reports across all TPG'ers. Taking it to another level.. In a perfect world, it would be nice to have an official or unofficial designator to indicate where our coins grade compared to all the other TPG'ers.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • robecrobec Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @johnny010 said:

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    I am assuming for this thread when Matt is asking for pop 1/0 coins he is referring to pop 1 coins with none graded higher in their designated group, be it Cameo, Deep , Cameo, RD, RB, BN, FB, etc.

    Maybe the confusion was created since the first coin posted in this thread is a 2/0.

    It can be a bit confusing. Plus, the added + and CAC grading. I've compared pop/census reports across all TPG'ers. Taking it to another level.. In a perfect world, it would be nice to have an official or unofficial designator to indicate where our coins grade compared to all the other TPG'ers.

    Again I could be mistaken but I took him to mean pop 1/0 with the company it is graded with. I don’t have an answer why Matt’s is a 2/0 unless the second one was recently made.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @johnny010 said:

    @robec said:

    @OAKSTAR said:

    @DMWJR said:
    Yes, my copy/paste technique has some flaws :D The 1896 is a 12/0. The coin I wanted to post, an 1892 MS67 1/0 did not have a TruView so I changed my mind and tried to edit the image to another coin.

    How about this one instead? It wasn’t from the Blay estate though.

    MS68 1/0

    Okay, thanks. Yes, your 1896 is a 12/0. I was just a little confused about these designators. So hypothetically, if you had a coin that was the "only" one graded (non higher non lower, the only one list), it would still be a 1/0?

    Obviously if it was the only one graded it would be a 1/0 no matter what the grade is. It is also a top pop 1/0 if there were a 1000 graded lower but none higher.

    I am assuming for this thread when Matt is asking for pop 1/0 coins he is referring to pop 1 coins with none graded higher in their designated group, be it Cameo, Deep , Cameo, RD, RB, BN, FB, etc.

    Maybe the confusion was created since the first coin posted in this thread is a 2/0.

    It can be a bit confusing. Plus, the added + and CAC grading. I've compared pop/census reports across all TPG'ers. Taking it to another level.. In a perfect world, it would be nice to have an official or unofficial designator to indicate where our coins grade compared to all the other TPG'ers.

    Again I could be mistaken but I took him to mean pop 1/0 with the company it is graded with. I don’t have an answer why Matt’s is a 2/0 unless the second one was recently made.

    Yes, that's very possible. A second one may have been recently graded.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...

    @robec said:

    Again I could be mistaken but I took him to mean pop 1/0 with the company it is graded with. I don’t have an answer why Matt’s is a 2/0 unless the second one was recently made.

    Cool! That means this coin is a 1/0, even though there is a raw coin out there that has less wear.

    And I just found out tonight that this went from a 1/0 to a 2/0, so I get a Mulligan.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,752 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Barberian said:
    ...

    @robec said:

    Again I could be mistaken but I took him to mean pop 1/0 with the company it is graded with. I don’t have an answer why Matt’s is a 2/0 unless the second one was recently made.

    Cool! That means this coin is a 1/0, even though there is a raw coin out there that has less wear.

    And I just found out tonight that this went from a 1/0 to a 2/0, so I get a Mulligan.

    Love that cathedral..

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 6, 2023 9:26PM

    And how about this rim-ding special as a "Top Pop" 1/0 for the WB-1 die marriage? It's been the PCGS "champ" now for 1.5 years.

    3 rim nicks away from Good

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file