NEW PURCHASE. What do you think? New TV and grading holder.
![jfriedm56](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/BSAD4LQD61GH/n4EJ2Y84B1Y5W.jpeg)
So I found this little beauty at my local coin show yesterday. Adding this to my type collection. Opinions and your thoughts on the grade.
16
So I found this little beauty at my local coin show yesterday. Adding this to my type collection. Opinions and your thoughts on the grade.
Comments
From the images provided the luster looks pristine (unmolested). If so, that counts for a lot in my book, regardless of the grade.
Nice mark free surfaces and a mostly full clean strike sure don't hurt either.
Congratulations!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
It looks great from here. 65?
64/65 here, nice coin 🪙
64ish to my eye, very nice type coin.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Ricko approved!!!
BHNC #248 … 130 and counting.
So I tried to guess the mintmark from just the obverse pic and was wrong. Could be the pics but for an S coin, there isn’t the right amount of rolling luster I’d expect. So despite the apparent very clean surfaces, I’m going with 64.
Very nice!
I’d prefer a little tone, but can also appreciate it the way it is too!
65
Mr_Spud
Like Walkerguy, I like them with just a bit of toning and dirt, but that looks very very nice to me. If it's got undisturbed luster, then it's a keeper!
Thanks for everyone’s input. In hand, the luster is uniform overall and satiny almost like a modern day burnished planchet.
64 or 65. Likely dipped at some time.
My guess-- 64+. Beautiful coin!
Awesome! 65 here. 👍
My YouTube Channel
64
See the TV
What a beautiful coin. Thanks for sharing.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
Nice coin @jfriedm56! Here's your full size TV![:) :)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/smile.png)
This is why I don't buy seated coins.. I would have said 66+ easy..
Nice coin.
Nice nice coin.