Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Any Jumbo returns ? Post them!!!

Comments

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lawyer05 said:
    Anyone receive any Jumbos from the special ?
    Post them here !!!

    Waiting on an order that’s in Assembly and hoping they pop this week…

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    …but realistically, it will probably be longer.

    Like three weeks. Or four.

    Or more…

    …who really knows?

    🤣😂🤣

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • kcherevkakcherevka Posts: 109 ✭✭✭

    What was the special? I missed it somehow.

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @kcherevka said:
    What was the special? I missed it somehow.

    August Jumbo Special $50 per

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • DBesse27DBesse27 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1951WheatiesPremium said:

    @kcherevka said:
    What was the special? I missed it somehow.

    August Jumbo Special $50 per

    Damn, wish I caught that!

    Yaz Master Set
    #1 Gino Cappelletti master set
    #1 John Hannah master set

    Also collecting Andre Tippett, Patriots Greats' RCs, Dwight Evans, 1964 Venezuelan Topps, 1974 Topps Red Sox

  • hankcaddyhankcaddy Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I sent in 2

    currently collecting baseball of
    2004 spx
    1989 topps psa 10
    1959 phillies
    Phillies of the 70's
  • DBesse27DBesse27 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 21, 2023 11:24AM

    @hankcaddy said:
    I sent in 2

    Nice cards, especially the deckle, but those aren’t jumbos. They’re tallboys/oversized. Then there’s supersized, then there’s jumbo, which is usually like an 8x10

    Yaz Master Set
    #1 Gino Cappelletti master set
    #1 John Hannah master set

    Also collecting Andre Tippett, Patriots Greats' RCs, Dwight Evans, 1964 Venezuelan Topps, 1974 Topps Red Sox

  • halosfanhalosfan Posts: 2,633 ✭✭✭✭

    Got these ones back for my AROD set







    Looking for a Glen Rice Inkredible and Alex Rodriguez cards
  • DBesse27DBesse27 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are supersize, not jumbo. Here’s a jumbo for comparison:

    Yaz Master Set
    #1 Gino Cappelletti master set
    #1 John Hannah master set

    Also collecting Andre Tippett, Patriots Greats' RCs, Dwight Evans, 1964 Venezuelan Topps, 1974 Topps Red Sox

  • Kid4hof03Kid4hof03 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I keep trying to fight it because I don't want to pay the jumbo fees or store the jumbo slabs, but man these looks really nice!

    Collecting anything and everything relating to Roger Staubach
  • You are so right about that. Waited awhile for the special, but still stinks to pay more than twice for the holder than I paid for the raw card. Once done it is nice having it in the collection though.

  • JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @umgoblue96 said:
    Sent in quite a few for my Bench set. Happy to get them graded (many with lower pops), but had a tough grader. The Rawlings had a pin hole, so expected the 1.

    Some great Bench items.

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Kid4hof03 said:
    I keep trying to fight it because I don't want to pay the jumbo fees or store the jumbo slabs, but man these looks really nice!

    They would look a lot nicer if they were not sitting crooked in the holder.
    For the kind of money spent to holder these, I would expect a better fit and presentation.

  • BBBrkrrBBBrkrr Posts: 1,238 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think I have the US version of that Sportscaster Bench, and have always loved that photo. It's maybe better than any of his cards. That's in the stack I'm planning to slab.

    Yours makes me want to get it done ASAP. Such a cool one. Congrats!

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BBBrkrr said:
    I think I have the US version of that Sportscaster Bench, and have always loved that photo. It's maybe better than any of his cards. That's in the stack I'm planning to slab.

    Yours makes me want to get it done ASAP. Such a cool one. Congrats!

    If that stack includes a Ron Cey and it grades decently, I'd be interested.

  • @BBBrkrr said:
    I think I have the US version of that Sportscaster Bench, and have always loved that photo. It's maybe better than any of his cards. That's in the stack I'm planning to slab.

    Yours makes me want to get it done ASAP. Such a cool one. Congrats!

    Thank you, and yes I agree it is one of his better card photos. It is difficult getting all of the versions. Here is the Japan version that was also part of this submission.

  • >

    Nice cards, especially the deckle, but those aren’t jumbos. They’re tallboys/oversized. Then there’s supersized, then there’s jumbo, which is usually like an 8x10

    you are correct , however the special was $50 for like jumbo, supersize and anything taller than a tallboy.... pricey for the supersized if you ask me

  • @umgoblue96 said:
    Sent in quite a few for my Bench set. Happy to get them graded (many with lower pops), but had a tough grader. The Rawlings had a pin hole, so expected the 1.








    love these........
    i have sanguillen Linetts, and rawlings , im waiting for my dell jumbo... we will see..

  • pdoidoipdoidoi Posts: 653 ✭✭✭✭

    Do they grade the big cards very different. Those are great looking pictures, can't believe how low the grades are. Maybe the backs of the cards are bad.

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These all look great!!!

    Congrats on all these hot new slabbed cards!

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • @pdoidoi said:
    Do they grade the big cards very different. Those are great looking pictures, can't believe how low the grades are. Maybe the backs of the cards are bad.

    I was very surprised myself with some of these. I have some 2's and 3's of other cards which do not look nearly as nice as these. I will inspect a little closer when they arrive back to me. The Kroger I know had a few hairline wrinkles, so did not think it would get above 5. Others are confusing to me as I thought I was pretty selective. Only going in my personal collection, so at least they are protected and I can enjoy how they look. May choose to have the Linnett reviewed eventually though.

  • redlegsredlegs Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @umgoblue96 said:
    Sent in quite a few for my Bench set. Happy to get them graded (many with lower pops), but had a tough grader. The Rawlings had a pin hole, so expected the 1.

    Terrific job on that 1974 Topps Stamp panel. That is such a tough one to find with a border on the left side.

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In a word?

    Delighted.






    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Bear48 said:

    Man, that’s awesome. He looks so young and mighty there…

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • Bear48Bear48 Posts: 241 ✭✭✭
    edited October 28, 2023 11:03AM

    Thank you. I cracked it out of a BGS 8.5 slab.

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sure glad I didn't send in my 67 Pinups if grades were coming back like this, and the backs are clean....
    (not my cards)

    And to those that think grading hasn't changed, here's an older flip....
    (quite a leap from 3 to 1)

  • Received my Jumbos...will be posting !!!

    One of the coolest things about collecting vintage Panamanian players is that you get to collect a whole array of cards from different sets ...

    Here is the Carew 1971 dell full page Jumbo it's a psa 4 pop 1 none higher ...

  • Most people think that the 1976 Rodeo 1956 Repint is from the regular 1955 rodeo sets ...Its not ..
    The reprint is of the tough 1955 Rodeo Premuims ...they only fit in Jumbos ....it took me 20 years to find this card....(picture)
    Here is Hector Lopez as a Rookie
    In 1955


  • King Dong !!!!!! POP 4 none higher 🥳🥳🥳

  • For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

  • Panama Mutiny  (Formerly lawyer05) Panama Mutiny (Formerly lawyer05) Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 1, 2023 8:35PM

    The only 1966 Adolfo Pros Piźza Known to exist ...
    They thought it was a myth ...
    Adolfo's Rookie in this super tough issue...

    https://www.sportscollectorsdaily.com/1966-1967-pros-pizza-cubs-white-sox/

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

  • @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    Noooo!!!

  • @lawyer05 said:

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    well these are different ..these have the glove tab...im referring to them being labeled Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola ..

    All they have to do is assign this card to that slot ..even if the label is wrong

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    You can email them and wait for a few weeks to get an automated response that sends you this link…

    …or you can just start here today and skip the call and wasted time. 😉

    https://www.psacard.com/myaccount/customerrequestcenter

    Through it, it will be corrected faster and at no expense to you from what I understand…

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2, 2023 1:53AM

    @lawyer05 said:
    well these are different ..these have the glove tab...im referring to them being labeled Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola ..

    I understand that, but it appears PSA is labeling the discs with glove tab with 2 different labels.
    (I believe they are the same product, but I could be wrong. Maybe the backs are different? I also noticed the Brett MSA Pepsi Disc has a card # of 32, and your Carew has no card #, so that adds to the confusion.)

    Here is a Brett example....

    All they have to do is assign this card to that slot ..even if the label is wrong

    And when I say it can't be fixed, I was referring to the POP count, since each label will have a separate POP.

  • EstilEstil Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭✭

    I don't suppose they ever got around to making holders that can fit 1993 Finest Jumbo All-Stars properly?

    WISHLIST
    D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
    Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
    74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
    73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
    95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
  • @1951WheatiesPremium said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    You can email them and wait for a few weeks to get an automated response that sends you this link…

    …or you can just start here today and skip the call and wasted time. 😉

    https://www.psacard.com/myaccount/customerrequestcenter

    Through it, it will be corrected faster and at no expense to you from what I understand…

    thank you

  • @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    yea i agree with you it screws up the pop count, i think this is the new way of naming them. Adding MSA to it..... the previous label did not have MSA and it is a MSA disc

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lawyer05 said:

    @1951WheatiesPremium said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    You can email them and wait for a few weeks to get an automated response that sends you this link…

    …or you can just start here today and skip the call and wasted time. 😉

    https://www.psacard.com/myaccount/customerrequestcenter

    Through it, it will be corrected faster and at no expense to you from what I understand…

    thank you

    Of course! PSA has a lot of good tools available though they’re not always the easiest to find.

    You can use that same link to request a card be added to a set, too (I think).

    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

  • @lawyer05 said:

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    Noooo!!!

    well we can all agree that the psa 9 mint is pop 1 only one higher in any of the two labels :smile::smile: lol

  • RonSportscardsRonSportscards Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lawyer05 said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    Noooo!!!

    well we can all agree that the psa 9 mint is pop 1 only one higher in any of the two labels :smile::smile: lol

    👍
    I like the set and wanted to put a PSA set together, but the label confusion and $75ea to grade them turned me off.

    Reminded me of the Wiffle discs mess, that have I think, 3 different labels, and many wrong discs under each of the labels.
    4sharpcorners listed a POP 1/none higher of one I was interested in, but of course there are several others under different labels. It went for too much money of course being a so-called POP 1. You might run into it since Carew is in that set.

  • @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    Noooo!!!

    well we can all agree that the psa 9 mint is pop 1 only one higher in any of the two labels :smile::smile: lol

    👍
    I like the set and wanted to put a PSA set together, but the label confusion and $75ea to grade them turned me off.

    Reminded me of the Wiffle discs mess, that have I think, 3 different labels, and many wrong discs under each of the labels.
    4sharpcorners listed a POP 1/none higher of one I was interested in, but of course there are several others under different labels. It went for too much money of course being a so-called POP 1. You might run into it since Carew is in that set.

    psa fixed so I can the Carew in my master set ...the next day I posted this...that was fast !!

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    @RonSportscards said:

    @lawyer05 said:

    For some reason they named this card Pepsi Disc instead of Pepsi Cola as normally named...now it won't go in my player registry for this reason alone
    I'll email them tommorrow

    That sure does screw up the POP counts of these, as there are other players listed with the MSA Pepsi Disc w/glove label.
    Your Carew is showing POP 1, none higher.
    But if you look at the POP of the other label 1977 Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, there are more graded, including 1 higher.
    For your Carew:

    Unless the MSA Pepsi Discs are somehow different than the Pepsi-Cola Baseball Stars Discs, the POP will never be correct, when they're using 2 different labels.
    Sort of like the complete screw up of the labeling on the Wiffle Discs. It can never be fixed.

    Noooo!!!

    well we can all agree that the psa 9 mint is pop 1 only one higher in any of the two labels :smile::smile: lol

    👍
    I like the set and wanted to put a PSA set together, but the label confusion and $75ea to grade them turned me off.

    Reminded me of the Wiffle discs mess, that have I think, 3 different labels, and many wrong discs under each of the labels.
    4sharpcorners listed a POP 1/none higher of one I was interested in, but of course there are several others under different labels. It went for too much money of course being a so-called POP 1. You might run into it since Carew is in that set.

    They re reduced grading to $40

  • 1951WheatiesPremium1951WheatiesPremium Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These are all pretty tough to find:







    Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest

Sign In or Register to comment.