Oh oh, I've got competition! Like others have said, patience is the key here, there is so many coins that have been messed with, including ones in graded holders. I'm doing the basic set and I'm #11 in the registry as of now, have 98 coins out of the required 113. I don't ever see completing it or winning any prizes for it at a PCGS luncheon , but it's been a fun ride for sure. Prices have been steadily rising too, this series is getting more attention now. Good luck with your set.
This approach does not just apply to Seated Half Dollars for me. I strive to have as many different grades in my coin sets (fair to au 58) as possible. Any time I add a new coin I either get the pleasure of adding a "New" grade, or I get to decide if the "New" coin is the better piece for my grading set. James I love wonderous variety in my coins.
Yes sir I did…it was love at first sight and didn’t think I would be able to find a lower grade example better than it…. I think it’s a beautiful 1879p…
@Leeroybrown said:
Possibly like some of you, although some of my set is a perfect VG-VF+…. Some of my set is also Fr02-G04 as well and not as “pretty” as the rest….
Does anybody else’s set also have these types of grades in their set and what are everyone’s thoughts on collecting the SLHD set in that grade range?
Nope. (My "back-up" 72-S is a decent VF30 too)
Seriously, I think it's a great idea so long as the coins don't look heavily cleaned or damaged. Even then, it's your collection. Collect what you want. Chart your own course. There are no rules to the hobby.
Yes sir I did…it was love at first sight and didn’t think I would be able to find a lower grade example better than it…. I think it’s a beautiful 1879p…
I love the color, cameo, and original skin
That was a coin I needed to see in hand. I'm glad you like it!
Lower grade examples are out there. This one sold recently for under $500. I didn't care for the tiny punctures on the obverse. Otherwise, it's nice and may still straight-grade. I now wish I'd bought it! LOL!
Super great set!
Right up my alley with look and circ grades.
I’m down to about 10, but might be inspired to jump back in…
It’d be cool to focus on dates a bit more. Mine are all altered in some way, so it will be fun to hunt for dates that are also stamped, chopped or carved and see how far I can get 👍
@skier07 said:
It’s your set and build it however you so desire.
I don’t particularly care for low grade problem coins but if you like them that’s all that matters.
I don’t really either @Skier07…. I prefer VG-VF original problem free…. I just started off buying the lower grade ones and whatever I found, but later resorted back to my VG-VF preferred grade and look…
There are some lower grade that are completely problem free and nice AG03-ish that I prob keep for now…. Some others will be a place holder until i upgrade…
The Carson City Seated halves would make a nice subset, and even the "common" ones in circulated grades are multiple times scarcer than the more popular CC Morgans.
@Leeroybrown said:
Finally got this coin in hand and it’s even better than in the pictures!
Would love to know thoughts on her!
It looks nice in pictures, but I'd have to see the obverse in hand to check out the surfaces. I suspect I'll regret not pulling the trigger on that coin when it was in Brian Greer's inventory.
@jayPem said:
That's the one.
It's a cast piece. It'd be cool to find a die struck piece also.
I can see why so many consider this set to be a daunting undertaking... really hard to complete!
Well, it's taken 17 years and I'm down to three more coins to complete the set by my criteria so . . . cost wise, I'm about halfway done with the set. However, I salted away a lot of duplicate coins that I liked that have taken off in this market, so that I just might be able to complete the climb.
For example, besides the raw '39 in F12 above that I prefer for my set (better story behind it), I also have a raw VF30 (below), and an NGC AU58 with splashes of blue-green toning. How many collectors with a VF30 and an NGC AU58 would sell them off and keep an F12?
Here's the VF30 that I find problematic and will sell - It should straight grade, though.
Here's my "copout" No drapery. I put off buying a 39 ND and then was sickened watching the rise in prices for one. I even considered not purchasing one until I established the criteria for my collection in my mind a year ago. The 39 ND was definitely in the set according to my criteria (includes all changes to the devices or lettering, no ultra-rarities (e.g., 53-O NA), no single DM varieties, (e.g., 44-O DD is out)).
That settled, I saw and won this semi-original, semi-problem coin for about $240 to put an end to the hole problem. In other words, I solved the hole problem and the cost problem with a problem coin. I like it, though, for what it is. Yes, there are "cheap filler" stories like that in my collection. So much for maintaining a uniform look for my collection. It's been entertaining, though. I've had lots of fun purchases and surprises with raw coins off eBay.
Do you think it could straight grade? A PCGS VG8 goes for around $500 these days.
They are all beautiful. But hands down the Arrows and Rays.........both denomination.
The first coin has a lightly but annoyingly scratched (graffiti) obverse but a great reverse and was purchased for an 89% discount over current Coin Prices. The second coin is being graded now, note the obverse planchet defect. I'm curious to see how they grade this coin. It's too nice not to be slabbed. "EF-details" will be a nice, proper "win" for this coin, IMO.
I treasure the slick F02 1853 AR quarter my grandmother saved from her change many years ago. I also purchased an AU 1853 AR quarter with a small rim bump at a Mcgloughlin and Robinson auction in the late '80s for $7. Nice coin except for that bump. Both need to be scanned. Stories are no good without pictures.
Yep, I actually stumbled across this coin as I was scrolling through online and something just didnt look right about the date, arrows…. And low and behold, upon closer look I saw it was mis-slabbed with the Wrong date and knowing that a 74S is a much more scars date. I snatched it up as quickly as I could. I believe that 1874S is one of the more scars are and tougher dates in the seated liberty half series And it’s one where mid grade VF examples do not come up very often.
So, a question to the group: should I have it re-slabbed with the proper date (74-S) or should I keep it in the wrong slab (71-S) for character and cool factor for my set?
I would love to know thoughts from everyone on the forum…??
Yep, I actually stumbled across this coin as I was scrolling through online and something just didnt look right about the date, arrows…. And low and behold, upon closer look I saw it was mis-slabbed with the Wrong date and knowing that a 74S is a much more scars date. I snatched it up as quickly as I could. I believe that 1874S is one of the more scars are and tougher dates in the seated liberty half series And it’s one where mid grade VF examples do not come up very often.
So, a question to the group: should I have it re-slabbed with the proper date (74-S) or should I keep it in the wrong slab (71-S) for character and cool factor for my set?
I would love to know thoughts from everyone on the forum…??
The 1874-S is tough to find nice in mid-grades. They are common in AG-VG but are often cleaned, corroded or messed with.
Yours looks to be a choice example with excellent color. There's a half dozen mid-grade coins on eBay now that are not anywhere near as attractive as your coin. So many have been cleaned.
Edited to add that I looked at the TVs. It may be lightly burnished a bit on the obverse and have some light corrosion at 12K on the reverse rim, but it's pretty nice compared to most mid-grade 74-Ss I see on eBay. I like it!
So, a question to the group: should I have it re-slabbed with the proper date (74-S) or should I keep it in the wrong slab (71-S) for character and cool factor for my set?
I would love to know thoughts from everyone on the forum…??
Definitely keep it as is, so much more interesting. I paid a small premium for my holder error, gotta love em!
Your slab error is a bit more off than mine, even… It’s crazy how things like that can be missed, but I agree with keeping it as is as it definitely adds a cool factor to my set as does the “1916-S” for yours!
@Barberian - appreciate the feedback! I agree it’s not perfect, but better than most I have seen in VF/ mid-grade as you stated.
Comments
Oh oh, I've got competition! Like others have said, patience is the key here, there is so many coins that have been messed with, including ones in graded holders. I'm doing the basic set and I'm #11 in the registry as of now, have 98 coins out of the required 113. I don't ever see completing it or winning any prizes for it at a PCGS luncheon
, but it's been a fun ride for sure. Prices have been steadily rising too, this series is getting more attention now. Good luck with your set.
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
Possibly like some of you, although some of my set is a perfect VG-VF+…. Some of my set is also Fr02-G04 as well and not as “pretty” as the rest….
Does anybody else’s set also have these types of grades in their set and what are everyone’s thoughts on collecting the SLHD set in that grade range?
Here is my first example below:
…here’s one more not so pretty example or two…
…and a couple more…
@JBN is my inspiration and his quality is my aspiration!
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
This approach does not just apply to Seated Half Dollars for me. I strive to have as many different grades in my coin sets (fair to au 58) as possible. Any time I add a new coin I either get the pleasure of adding a "New" grade, or I get to decide if the "New" coin is the better piece for my grading set. James I love wonderous variety in my coins.
Here’s a better look at my 1884 as well….
This pic shows the color and surfaces a bit better…
They are all beautiful. But hands down the Arrows and Rays.........both denomination.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
So, you're the one who snatched that 1879 up.
Yes sir I did…it was love at first sight and didn’t think I would be able to find a lower grade example better than it…. I think it’s a beautiful 1879p…
I love the color, cameo, and original skin
Nope. (My "back-up" 72-S is a decent VF30 too)
Seriously, I think it's a great idea so long as the coins don't look heavily cleaned or damaged. Even then, it's your collection. Collect what you want. Chart your own course. There are no rules to the hobby.
Here's an 1855/54.
Very nice 72-s and 55/54
That was a coin I needed to see in hand. I'm glad you like it!
Lower grade examples are out there. This one sold recently for under $500. I didn't care for the tiny punctures on the obverse. Otherwise, it's nice and may still straight-grade. I now wish I'd bought it! LOL!
Super great set!
Right up my alley with look and circ grades.
I’m down to about 10, but might be inspired to jump back in…
It’d be cool to focus on dates a bit more. Mine are all altered in some way, so it will be fun to hunt for dates that are also stamped, chopped or carved and see how far I can get 👍
One of my favorite SLHs.
It’s your set and build it however you so desire.
I don’t particularly care for low grade problem coins but if you like them that’s all that matters.
I don’t really either @Skier07…. I prefer VG-VF original problem free…. I just started off buying the lower grade ones and whatever I found, but later resorted back to my VG-VF preferred grade and look…
There are some lower grade that are completely problem free and nice AG03-ish that I prob keep for now…. Some others will be a place holder until i upgrade…
JayPem,
Your chop marked seated halves are very cool!
Thanks for the opportunity to post them..😀
I apologize if one or two are a bit crass, but its actually a bit tough to find potty seated halves..
There's also a contemporary counterfeit in there as well!
Is the contemporary counterfeit the 64-s by chance?
That's the one.
It's a cast piece. It'd be cool to find a die struck piece also.
I can see why so many consider this set to be a daunting undertaking... really hard to complete!
The Carson City Seated halves would make a nice subset, and even the "common" ones in circulated grades are multiple times scarcer than the more popular CC Morgans.
My Adolph A. Weinman signature
Finally got this coin in hand and it’s even better than in the pictures!
Would love to know thoughts on her!
Very nice examples everyone!! Seated halves are my favorite.
It looks nice in pictures, but I'd have to see the obverse in hand to check out the surfaces. I suspect I'll regret not pulling the trigger on that coin when it was in Brian Greer's inventory.
This coin was an eBay BIN listed at way too low a price. It didn't last long.
I like that 1839 w/ drapery. It’s got a good look…
Mine is not quite as nice…. But still a decent look…
Well, it's taken 17 years and I'm down to three more coins to complete the set by my criteria so . . . cost wise, I'm about halfway done with the set. However, I salted away a lot of duplicate coins that I liked that have taken off in this market, so that I just might be able to complete the climb.
For example, besides the raw '39 in F12 above that I prefer for my set (better story behind it), I also have a raw VF30 (below), and an NGC AU58 with splashes of blue-green toning. How many collectors with a VF30 and an NGC AU58 would sell them off and keep an F12?
Here's the VF30 that I find problematic and will sell - It should straight grade, though.
I like it. I'd have bought that one if I'd seen it...but I already have three.
Here's my "copout" No drapery. I put off buying a 39 ND and then was sickened watching the rise in prices for one. I even considered not purchasing one until I established the criteria for my collection in my mind a year ago. The 39 ND was definitely in the set according to my criteria (includes all changes to the devices or lettering, no ultra-rarities (e.g., 53-O NA), no single DM varieties, (e.g., 44-O DD is out)).
That settled, I saw and won this semi-original, semi-problem coin for about $240 to put an end to the hole problem. In other words, I solved the hole problem and the cost problem with a problem coin. I like it, though, for what it is. Yes, there are "cheap filler" stories like that in my collection. So much for maintaining a uniform look for my collection. It's been entertaining, though. I've had lots of fun purchases and surprises with raw coins off eBay.
Do you think it could straight grade? A PCGS VG8 goes for around $500 these days.
The first coin has a lightly but annoyingly scratched (graffiti) obverse but a great reverse and was purchased for an 89% discount over current Coin Prices. The second coin is being graded now, note the obverse planchet defect. I'm curious to see how they grade this coin. It's too nice not to be slabbed. "EF-details" will be a nice, proper "win" for this coin, IMO.
I treasure the slick F02 1853 AR quarter my grandmother saved from her change many years ago. I also purchased an AU 1853 AR quarter with a small rim bump at a Mcgloughlin and Robinson auction in the late '80s for $7. Nice coin except for that bump. Both need to be scanned. Stories are no good without pictures.
New addition…
Pardon my ignorance, but I'd like to point out that that 1871 looks to be an 1874...🤔
I suppose I should pull out my Redbook
It does look like a 74 doesn’t it???
And with an “S” mint mark still…
Hmmmmmm…
Let me know what you find in your Redbook…
Sadly I'm not familiar enough with seated halves to already know this, but i had to check if there was a 1874/1 overdate 😅
Looks like you have a very rare label error here, congratulations...🤤
@jayPem,
Yep, I actually stumbled across this coin as I was scrolling through online and something just didnt look right about the date, arrows…. And low and behold, upon closer look I saw it was mis-slabbed with the Wrong date and knowing that a 74S is a much more scars date. I snatched it up as quickly as I could. I believe that 1874S is one of the more scars are and tougher dates in the seated liberty half series And it’s one where mid grade VF examples do not come up very often.
So, a question to the group: should I have it re-slabbed with the proper date (74-S) or should I keep it in the wrong slab (71-S) for character and cool factor for my set?
I would love to know thoughts from everyone on the forum…??
Unless you wish to place all your coins into a registry set, I'd keep the crazy holder since it is a nice discussion piece with other collectors!
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
The 1874-S is tough to find nice in mid-grades. They are common in AG-VG but are often cleaned, corroded or messed with.
Yours looks to be a choice example with excellent color. There's a half dozen mid-grade coins on eBay now that are not anywhere near as attractive as your coin. So many have been cleaned.
Edited to add that I looked at the TVs. It may be lightly burnished a bit on the obverse and have some light corrosion at 12K on the reverse rim, but it's pretty nice compared to most mid-grade 74-Ss I see on eBay. I like it!
Oh yeah, that's nice!
I was going to look up the true view but forgot.
Definitely keep it as is, so much more interesting. I paid a small premium for my holder error, gotta love em!
Seated Dollar Collection
Sweet coin Southcounty!
Your slab error is a bit more off than mine, even… It’s crazy how things like that can be missed, but I agree with keeping it as is as it definitely adds a cool factor to my set as does the “1916-S” for yours!
@Barberian - appreciate the feedback! I agree it’s not perfect, but better than most I have seen in VF/ mid-grade as you stated.
I am glad I stumbled upon it…
A few additions to the set in progress…
A few more additions to the set…. (Figured I would keep the coin pics all on the same thread…)