@mr1931S said:
I don't get why there is so much fear of Nic-a-date. It seems to me the fun in owning a coin like a 1916 DDO is in being able to actually see the dramatic error. The key to getting a good result with Nic-a-date is to remove oil from the coin before applying the Nic-a-date chemical to the date. Acetone will do this. I've got Nic-a-date treated buffalo nickels that look great with all the date digits popping out and no dark discoloration from the Nic-a-date.
Market acceptance is the reason. Nic-a-date is considered alternating a coin even though it brings out the details. I’ve owned a few 16 ddo’s throughout the years and the ones with very little to no date always sold for more than the nic-a-dated ones. The one coming from NGC graded as AG3 will bring more than a restored dated one if I decide to sell it. Here is a picture of a 16DDO that I sold with a restored date (the whole coin was nic-a-dated) and showed the details quite nicely. It would never bring the money a non altered coin would bring even though it shows the doubling of the date nicely.
Members I have done business with: Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
@mr1931S said:
I don't get why there is so much fear of Nic-a-date. It seems to me the fun in owning a coin like a 1916 DDO is in being able to actually see the dramatic error. The key to getting a good result with Nic-a-date is to remove oil from the coin before applying the Nic-a-date chemical to the date. Acetone will do this. I've got Nic-a-date treated buffalo nickels that look great with all the date digits popping out and no dark discoloration from the Nic-a-date.
Makes much more sense than owning a dateless nickel. I wouldn’t mind owning an acid treated Buffalo overdate either 1916 or 1918/7 at a reasonable price l.
@mr1931S said:
I don't get why there is so much fear of Nic-a-date. It seems to me the fun in owning a coin like a 1916 DDO is in being able to actually see the dramatic error. The key to getting a good result with Nic-a-date is to remove oil from the coin before applying the Nic-a-date chemical to the date. Acetone will do this. I've got Nic-a-date treated buffalo nickels that look great with all the date digits popping out and no dark discoloration from the Nic-a-date.
Makes much more sense than owning a dateless nickel. I wouldn’t mind owning an acid treated Buffalo overdate either 1916 or 1918/7 at a reasonable price l.
I saw an '18 over '17-D recently where the entire coin was Nic-a-dated. Really bad job. Some people should have their Nic-a-date taken away from them. Coin conservation with Nic-a-date is an art not a hatchet job. I have found all of the key date Buffalo nickels before 1916 using Nic-a-date, 13-D and S (II), 14-D, 15-S.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
@mr1931S said:
I don't get why there is so much fear of Nic-a-date. It seems to me the fun in owning a coin like a 1916 DDO is in being able to actually see the dramatic error. The key to getting a good result with Nic-a-date is to remove oil from the coin before applying the Nic-a-date chemical to the date. Acetone will do this. I've got Nic-a-date treated buffalo nickels that look great with all the date digits popping out and no dark discoloration from the Nic-a-date.
Market acceptance is the reason. Nic-a-date is considered alternating a coin even though it brings out the details. I’ve owned a few 16 ddo’s throughout the years and the ones with very little to no date always sold for more than the nic-a-dated ones. The one coming from NGC graded as AG3 will bring more than a restored dated one if I decide to sell it. Here is a picture of a 16DDO that I sold with a restored date (the whole coin was nic-a-dated) and showed the details quite nicely. It would never bring the money a non altered coin would bring even though it shows the doubling of the date nicely.
Nice looking piece.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Comments
Market acceptance is the reason. Nic-a-date is considered alternating a coin even though it brings out the details. I’ve owned a few 16 ddo’s throughout the years and the ones with very little to no date always sold for more than the nic-a-dated ones. The one coming from NGC graded as AG3 will bring more than a restored dated one if I decide to sell it. Here is a picture of a 16DDO that I sold with a restored date (the whole coin was nic-a-dated) and showed the details quite nicely. It would never bring the money a non altered coin would bring even though it shows the doubling of the date nicely.
Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
NGC did the right thing. 👍
My YouTube Channel
Glad this worked out for you. It was a fairly obvious mistake on their part, and they appear to be owning it. Kudos to NGC
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Makes much more sense than owning a dateless nickel. I wouldn’t mind owning an acid treated Buffalo overdate either 1916 or 1918/7 at a reasonable price l.
Well, it can always be Nic-A-Dated by anyone who buys it. But once treated, it can never be original again.
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
I saw an '18 over '17-D recently where the entire coin was Nic-a-dated. Really bad job. Some people should have their Nic-a-date taken away from them. Coin conservation with Nic-a-date is an art not a hatchet job. I have found all of the key date Buffalo nickels before 1916 using Nic-a-date, 13-D and S (II), 14-D, 15-S.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Nice looking piece.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
There really isn't any need to help.
No date but it shows enough doubling in the correct areas to look for determine what it is.
I think dateless buffs are an opportunity to find something pretty cool. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW