Key date Peace dollar GTG
logger7
Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭✭✭
1
logger7
Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭✭✭
logger7
Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
63
64
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
62 its a bit scuffy.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
AU details scratched
63+
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
63
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
Where's the wear and a scratch or scratches that would merit a details-grade?
Thanks.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I am thinking 58 on this one.
MS62
63
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
I'd go with MS63.
As far as the wear, the coin has an infinite number of nicks/dings all over both sides. Chatter is somewhat of an understatement. Liberty shouldn’t have 5 o’clock shadow where we see each hair stubble on a mint state coin.
As far as the scratches, they are on the reverse side eagle’s wing. Possibly graffiti, but more likely 2 or 3 semi-circular scratches.
Thank you for the reply.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
MS63
62
Dave
Deleted duplicate post.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
62
though call- I would like to see the surfaces in hand. My concern is that the surfaces may not measure to expectations- and if not, its a 62. If the coin has the look in hand, I think 63 is appropriate
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
62
Eagles wing is disconcerting. 61
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
Looks like a textbook 62. No discernible wear. Might be a 63 if it were a common date, but get's a proper grade of 62 because it is a key date.
62
Mr_Spud
Lots of chatter but a solid 63 imho, nice!
62
Philippians 4:4-7
61
63
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
I don't know, lots of scuff marks but I like the strike, nice detail.
I'll go with MS-64
62
I'll admit, I suck at grading Peace dollars.
I'll put my initial guess of MS60, but reading the responses tells me that's a ways off.
Coin Photographer.
MS 63
MS64
Numerous scuff marks with nice luster would limit the grade to a 63 IMO.
I'll end the suspense on this one: https://www.pcgs.com/cert/47975206
The submitter was thinking AU or Unc. and was not expecting a straight grade. I bought a number of branch mint better dates in the collection that did straight grade.
Huh? I was thinking 63. Maybe some hairlines in the L obv field that don't show up due to the lighting?
Id resubmit that one multiple times. I see no evidence of a cleaning whatsoever. Angles could tell a different story though.
I recently had a coin grade details / roller marks yet it came from a mint set. So I would agree with the details grade with all the scratches but not the cleaning part.
Any evidence of cleaning is not showing up in the pics. A perfect example of why you can't really grade from pics.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Bummer…. I was in the 63 camp, yes lots of little marks, but luster and eye appeal helped prop it up. Did not see a Details grade coming.
62 good day 63
Martin
62+
bob
Not my series at all , but I was going to WAG that luster trumped bag marks and got it to 64. With info that it did not straight grade, the obverse field front of face does look a bit off.
Buffalo Nickel Digital Album
Toned Buffalo Date SetDigital Album
That nasty muted paste coloration on both sides (i.e. the cleaning) is another thing that should have dropped this to AU details, in addition to my comments above. PCGS got this one wrong, it’s not unc.
This thing is a mess of a coin. I say don’t throw good money after bad by continuing to resubmit this dog, but to each their own. Sell it and move along (quickly).
Never would have guessed cleaned. Does it look different in hand than in the pics?
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
It probably had some hairlines which don't always show up in pics unless the coin in angled just right under a bright light.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
MS 62
58
62+, I'd be happy to own that one!
-Just saw the reveal up there... that is an interesting result
Collector, occasional seller
Are we looking at the same coin?
I see what looks like nice luster on this one which I think you are calling "paste coloration".
A baggy coin for sure but it looks unc to me.
Collector, occasional seller
I think he was talking about the paste coloration on the luster.
Cleaned? True View pictures strike again. When using (Not so) True Views the title should be "Stump the Graders" not "Guess the Grade" (of the pictures).
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"