Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG $20 Saint (Revealed)

stevebensteveben Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 26, 2023 7:51AM in U.S. Coin Forum

care to guess?


Comments

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 8,972 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice - I'll go 65

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Have a nice day
  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My first thought is 64. But wouldn't be surprised with 65.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,371 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64 give or take a grade or two. ;)

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64. MS65 if it had a mint mark.

    Got Crust....y gold?
  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • wozymodowozymodo Posts: 138 ✭✭✭

    65

  • scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am going to use the grading formula that seems to work best for me. Take the grade that pops into my head first, 65, and reduce the grade down one = MS64!

  • JW77JW77 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64+

  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I really like your Saint.
    I'm going to say 64 in the rattler. Perhaps it would grade 65 by today's standards.

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Coins & Currency
  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    nice
    64

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

    looks solid 4/4+

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is a very nice gold Saint... I would say MS64... Cheers, RickO

  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,040 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65+ ?

    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly
  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks 64-65 so I’ll guess 64+.

    Nice coin BTW.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65.

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,400 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting grade... seems to memorialize a certain point in TPG development and the rationale today as to why rattlers remain popular while trading at a premium.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I clumsily missed the rattler signs. Would have been more conservative and still wrong. Tough grade.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,371 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There may have been hairlines or some other flaws that aren't showing up in the pics shown in the opening post which resulted in the guessed grades being higher than the grades assigned by the PCGS graders who actually examined the coin in hand. Or, perhaps the PCGS graders were just plain wrong. That's why PCGS has a reconsideration service after all.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    There may have been hairlines or some other flaws that aren't showing up in the pics shown in the opening post which resulted in the guessed grades being higher than the grades assigned by the PCGS graders who actually examined the coin in hand. Or, perhaps the PCGS graders were just plain wrong. That's why PCGS has a reconsideration service after all.

    well, grading is very subjective. i saw this coin and thought, that is a 64, easy! cac seems to agree that its better than 62. most people here guessed 64. my photos aren't the greatest, but i can say it doesn't have any hairlines...just a few spots, which you can see on the eagle on the rev. there is one of the obv. there are a few marks here and there consistent with 64. not sure why it was graded so low. either way, its just a common bullion piece, but has a nice look!

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 8,972 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow, never thought 62 - even in the old holder.

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • johnnybjohnnyb Posts: 40 ✭✭✭

    You can never go wrong with an older holder plus gold cac. It’s a nice coin. I would have guessed 64 but I came on the scene too late.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A 62 rattler with a gold sticker is kind of equivalent to a 64 with todays grading standards.

  • HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,198 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very pretty coin. I would almost never buy a coin for the slab, but that is a really cool coin/slab/CAC combination.

    Higashiyama
  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin is nicer than the MS-63 Saint I had in an OGH holder.

    It has less dings for sure, so I thought it was a lock at 64.

    Go figure.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am really surprised, but the gold CAC sticker makes me feel better.... Looks like a candidate for reconsideration or a raw submittal. Though it would probably sell for a profit based on the rattler and gold sticker. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file