Home U.S. Coin Forum

I wouldn't be any good grading Seated Dollars for PCGS

braddickbraddick Posts: 24,184 ✭✭✭✭✭

Somehow the graders can spot the difference between a cleaned Seated dollar and one that hasn't been- or is market acceptable.
I wouldn't be good at it, I suppose.

CLEANED:





NOT CLEANED (?):

peacockcoins

Comments

  • HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This would make a very interesting GTG!

    Higashiyama
  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 848 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I will agree with you. I long ago came to the conclusion that both PCGS and NGC just threw darts at a board when it came to Seated Dollars. James

  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,763 ✭✭✭✭
    edited May 4, 2023 11:35AM

    Even though they called it cleaned, I like the look of that 46.

    imageimage

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They all look “unoriginal” and messed with including the one that straight graded.

  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s a matter of where to draw the line - there are other examples of this conundrum - hairlines on Peace Dollars come to mind.

    I suspect if you had them in hand and under a harsh halogen lamp, it would be far more apparent.

  • savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,295 ✭✭✭✭

    four are "cleaned" but one is "cleaning"

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @savoyspecial said:
    four are "cleaned" but one is "cleaning"

    That one is from a different submission looking at the cert number. I wonder if he meant to include the cleaned 1860-O instead of the 1850-O.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 4, 2023 1:15PM

    @Batman23 said:

    @savoyspecial said:
    four are "cleaned" but one is "cleaning"

    That one is from a different submission looking at the cert number. I wonder if he meant to include the cleaned 1860-O instead of the 1850-O.

    It’s probably not a great idea to submit five coin together that all look like they’ve been cleaned.

  • WCCWCC Posts: 2,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Project Numismatics said:
    It’s a matter of where to draw the line - there are other examples of this conundrum - hairlines on Peace Dollars come to mind.

    I suspect if you had them in hand and under a harsh halogen lamp, it would be far more apparent.

    IMO, there should be a stricter standard of "market acceptable" for Peace dollars vs. Seated.

  • conrad99conrad99 Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    @savoyspecial said:
    four are "cleaned" but one is "cleaning"

    One of them just isn't done yet. Give it a few more years.

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 4, 2023 8:19PM

    Second '71 and '64 are dead ringers.

    This is where AI will come in handy as a finalyzer.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've had heavily toned, almost terminal Seated dollars. One long time dealer said it probably needed to be dipped but as it was Unc. didn't want to take the chance. You have to wonder what the treatment history was with each.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As several have stated above, if the coins could be viewed in hand, under good lighting, and tilted at angles, we could better judge the cleaning aspect. Cheers, RickO

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree that the AU58 coin should be in a bodybag also. The entire group has been messed with.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file