I will guess 64BN as well. Possibly 63BN if PCGS is stingy. Worst case is Genuine-QC -- PCGS seems to be hammering colorfully toned Lincolns lately. I recently had a handful of album-toned Lincolns get hammered with QC (including a 31-S )
So this weak/soft strike ya'll guys have mentioned mixed with the obverse toning to me appears to be rub but apparently is not. I should change my answer from 58 to 65BN but instead I'll just wait to be schooled...
@mattniss said:
Thanks for all the guesses everyone. This came back MS62BN(!!). I had been expecting 63BN all day, maybe a small chance for RB.
On the bright side, this might be the nicest MS62BN 1931-S out there, so maybe it will go to CAC at some point. PCGS really tough graders these days!
Okay. PCGS says not "choice". "Select" unc. say they probably because of the bit of strike weakness seen. If this piece were mine, I would leave it be gradewise as you say you are going to do. CAC green sticker would likely happen and would be a nice touch. PCGS is very conservative, the most conservative grading service of them all. Notwithstanding what anyone says, your '31-S is a coin you can continue to be proud to own. The color/toning is very nice. As the millennials say, "it is what it is."
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
@telephoto1 said: I thought you were just hedging your bets.
The coin has the obverse look of lighter toned high point areas which appear to be cabinet friction. I know from medals which quite often sit in a "box of issue" for decades and end up looking similarly that it's not rub, but a coin like this would tend to be rub. So, yes, I think it was a sort of hedge.
Comments
WAG VF20![;) ;)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/wink.png)
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
peacockcoins
Late die state (especially on the reverse).
MS64BN is my estimation. Close to RB but maybe not quite.
65 BN
USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
My current Registry sets:
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)
MS65BN.
Coin Photographer.
I'll guess 64.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
64BN, a sweet example.
63BN
64BN.
AU62.
65 RB
64BN
- Bob -
![image](https://robecsimages.com/photos/MPL/MPLcollageNGCwhite.jpg)
MPL's - Lincolns of Color
Central Valley Roosevelts
63 Brown. Fingerprints visible in the obverse fields should prevent it from going higher. The soft appearance also does not help.
65 RB Progressive Indirect Design Transfer. Not be confused with a die clash or a greasy ghost.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
Solid coin. 64BN
Drunner
When I posted that there wasn't an image visible.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
So edit your post.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
I thought you were applying EAC + grading standards!
64 BN
peacockcoins
Not RB to my eye. I'll say 64BN, late dies state, as noted, and pretty! Prints never bothered me much but most people, and graders don't like them.
Tom
I'm in the 64BN camp myself, but would not be surprised if in a 65BN.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I'll also go 64BN
65BN was my first impression...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
65bn
What did it grade?
63 BN
I will guess 64BN as well. Possibly 63BN if PCGS is stingy. Worst case is Genuine-QC -- PCGS seems to be hammering colorfully toned Lincolns lately. I recently had a handful of album-toned Lincolns get hammered with QC (including a 31-S
)
I believe it deserves 65BN, but will probably grade 64BN. A beauty for that series. Congrats.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
64BN
MS63BN
A nice looking MS64BN I'm thinking.
5BN
58
64BN
64 BN
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Looks like a 64BN to me... TruView's are usually beauty shots... so maybe 63. Cheers, RickO
Looks about MS64BN to me. Lots of red peeking through. Nice stinkin' Lincoln!![:) :)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/smile.png)
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
64RB although I personally think it should be 64BN
64 rb, I like
Choice uncirculated, MS64. I like it.![;) ;)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/wink.png)
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
64 BN, very nice key.
So this weak/soft strike ya'll guys have mentioned mixed with the obverse toning to me appears to be rub but apparently is not. I should change my answer from 58 to 65BN but instead I'll just wait to be schooled...
62
Thanks for all the guesses everyone. This came back MS62BN(!!). I had been expecting 63BN all day, maybe a small chance for RB.
On the bright side, this might be the nicest MS62BN 1931-S out there, so maybe it will go to CAC at some point. PCGS really tough graders these days!
My guess was 64 BN Nice coin!
My YouTube Channel
Wondering if the luster is lower than the photo suggests, it is a tough date to find nice. A gold bean would look nice on that slab.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Okay. PCGS says not "choice". "Select" unc. say they probably because of the bit of strike weakness seen. If this piece were mine, I would leave it be gradewise as you say you are going to do. CAC green sticker would likely happen and would be a nice touch. PCGS is very conservative, the most conservative grading service of them all. Notwithstanding what anyone says, your '31-S is a coin you can continue to be proud to own. The color/toning is very nice. As the millennials say, "it is what it is."
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
So my guess was AU62 and @telephoto1 gave me an lol. I hope it was for the AU and not the 62!!![:p :p](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/tongue.png)
I thought you were just hedging your bets.![B) B)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/sunglasses.png)
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
@telephoto1 said: I thought you were just hedging your bets.
The coin has the obverse look of lighter toned high point areas which appear to be cabinet friction. I know from medals which quite often sit in a "box of issue" for decades and end up looking similarly that it's not rub, but a coin like this would tend to be rub. So, yes, I think it was a sort of hedge.![:) :)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/smile.png)