GTG 1933 S Walking Liberty Half Dollar. GRADE REVEALED NOW
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4084e/4084e3fa41838f5a0736c22a8a49fcf739154dbd" alt="Walkerlover"
I would like to get opinions on the grading of this coin. Thanks to all who contributed.
3
I would like to get opinions on the grading of this coin. Thanks to all who contributed.
Comments
MS62
58
MS58 - Cabinet friction on the reverse
MS62
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
55 shot 8
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
58
I'm in the MS-62 crowd.
AU-55.
Coin Photographer.
Au details cleaned
All you Walker experts are way high on this one! AU53 in a NGC holder
AU 55
AU58.
Light cleaning, but not too objectionable (market acceptable).
If AU-53 was brutal on that one imo!
62
Probably 58 in this holder, 55 in a PCGS holder.
I’m assuming the long wavy scratch above the date is on the holder.
AU 55. Looks like it may have been wiped down.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I would say AU58..... Wear on reverse.... Cheers, RickO
AU55
63
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
AU55
55
Cleaned AU....
Exactly my initial thought.
Tom
AU-55
58
Ditto
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
58
I would say AU53 at best. I agree with Dcarr, light cleaning but MA.
Successful BST transactions- Bfjohnson, Collectorcoins, 1peter223, Shrub68, Byers, Greencopper, Coinlieutenant
Only a few guessed the grade correctly. Congrats to them. Perhaps a light cleaning I am no expert?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0695/b0695a7c1c50db8898fe418dd3a92114f412dd8c" alt=""
Damn im good! Nice coin!
There was likely some net grading applied, for the cleaning and/or surface abrasions. The details look better than 53 to me. Or maybe they’ve tightened standards?