4pl-I'm often surprised at how high they grade. But they do show scuffs and scrapes way more than non pl/dpl coins, so I suppose it's the right way to do it.
This is a typical look for the date. PL63 with about a 50% shot at 64 which suggests PL63+ seems reasonable. The CC Morgans are baggy for various reasons. The quality of the product for the most part is excellent especially for 82-84. The standard for grading these remains a work in progress given how they were handled, stored and transported. Keep in mind that bag marks on PL surfaces are magnified and look worse than they are.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
My grade would be MS-62 PL because of the marks on the cheek.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
63PL
Enough chatter to keep it away from 64 imo, beautiful coin
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
That is a little tough. Here are some 63PL's from CoinFacts to compare to yours. The 62PL's on CoinFacts are far worse than your obverse. Maybe an email to pcgs with a copy of these grades might get you a free regrade. Who knows.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
justindan
Posts: 662 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
63
62
MS62PL.
Young Numismatist, Coin Photography: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1090140/flyingal-coin-photography-10-photos#latest
62PL maybe 63PL on a good day.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
64
Mr_Spud
4pl-I'm often surprised at how high they grade. But they do show scuffs and scrapes way more than non pl/dpl coins, so I suppose it's the right way to do it.
Tom
Seems to be a lot of chatter on the obverse so I would guess 62
Even making allowance for CCs being baggier coins as a rule, I'd call it 63PL, which means they gave it a 64PL.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
61PL.
bob
62pl
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
62PL
I would be at a 62PL
I'll also say 62pl
MS62PL
62 PL here too.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
i thought it was dmpl
63
This is a typical look for the date. PL63 with about a 50% shot at 64 which suggests PL63+ seems reasonable. The CC Morgans are baggy for various reasons. The quality of the product for the most part is excellent especially for 82-84. The standard for grading these remains a work in progress given how they were handled, stored and transported. Keep in mind that bag marks on PL surfaces are magnified and look worse than they are.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
62PL, unless in a GSA holder, in which case I'd guess 63PL.
My grade would be MS-62 PL because of the marks on the cheek.
62 or 63, but leaning to 62. There is a lot of marking on her cheek.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
63 seems reasonable.
63, but wouldn't be surprised by 62.
IG: DeCourcyCoinsEbay: neilrobertson
"Numismatic categorizations, if left unconstrained, will increase spontaneously over time." -me
62, too many marks on her cheek.
62 CAC
63 no CAC
62PL
65 PL
MS-62 PL. I would have said 61, but the reverse is decent.
Young Numismatist
62.
62 PL
I’m at 63PL - they are lenient on 82 to 84 CC Morgan’s imo
63PL
Enough chatter to keep it away from 64 imo, beautiful coin
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
62
MS62PL
Grade reveal: 61PL.
Thanks to everyone for playing.
61 seems very tough
BHNC #203
Wow! I’m surprised.
Tom
Nice CC Morgan... I would have guessed 62.... Cheers, RickO
@Treashunt agreed. I thought 62+/63 in hand before sending to PCGS.
345810979
At least you got the PL
That's weird, I actually got the correct grade! I think it's a first!!
bob
@Che_Grapes no kidding!
@AUandAG you're the winner!!!
That is a little tough. Here are some 63PL's from CoinFacts to compare to yours. The 62PL's on CoinFacts are far worse than your obverse. Maybe an email to pcgs with a copy of these grades might get you a free regrade. Who knows.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
@jesbroken thanks for the time and information. That is a great idea. Either that or sending it to CAC in hopes of the gold bean.
Yeah 61 seems low to me as well.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
61 seems low, based on the TV. It must look turdly in hand compared to the TV.
Go for a gold cac.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc