Home U.S. Coin Forum

Three Veterans of the Civil War - and The Denver Mint - 1904

1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited September 9, 2022 6:47AM in U.S. Coin Forum


Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

Bad transactions with : nobody to date

Comments

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wonder why coinage did not begin until 1906?

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1630Boston ... Thanks for another interesting thread and video... Cheers, RickO

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,158 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    I wonder why coinage did not begin until 1906?

    from Coin World below:

    As the end of 1905 approached, officials at the Denver Mint were getting ready for the new facility’s grand opening, testing the equipment to make sure the plant would be ready to start striking coins the next year.

    The government had wanted a federal Mint established in Denver since the Civil War era, when the Colorado region was the center of a silver and gold rush. The government had even purchased a private mint in Denver in 1862, but officials chose not to strike federal coinage there, blaming the “hostility of the Indian tribes along the routes” for not beginning an official coinage. Instead, the building was first used as a refuge from the Indians for women and children and then as a federal assay office instead. Decades later, in December 1895, Congress authorized a Mint in Denver; nearly nine years later, in September 1904, operations of the old Assay Office were transferred to the new facility. However, the new Denver Mint was not ready to strike coinage yet.

    The next year, 1905, saw the facility begin processing local silver and gold ore though the Mint still was not prepared to strike coins. Finally, on Nov. 1, 1905, a coinage press was fired up and the first pieces were struck. They were not coins, though.

    The press was used to strike uniface bronze medals the diameter of a gold double eagle. The design was exceedingly simple, with one side reading DENVER 1905 and the other side blank. The medal has a dentiled rim on both sides and a reeded edge. The striking of the medals was part of a ceremony celebrating the opening of the Mint. Colorado’s governor and other government officials participated in the event and examples of the medal were presumably passed out to attendees.

    In a 2009 auction by Heritage, one of those medals was offered for sale. It realized $2,070.

    Collectors have long categorized the 1905 Denver Mint Opening medal as a so-called dollar, a form of commemorative medal that is approximately the size of a standard silver dollar. In the standard reference for the series, the medal is cataloged as HK-876.

    The piece sold in the auction is graded Mint State 63 red and brown by Numismatic Guaranty Corp.

    The Heritage lot description states: “Struck in bronze with a reeded edge. This specimen exhibits pleasing reddish coloration throughout and lacks any serious flaws worthy of disclosure. This popular so-called dollar was the first issue produced at the newly constructed Denver Mint and, according to the newly released Hibler-Kappen reference (2008), less than 75 pieces are believed extant in all grades. Census: 2 in 63 Red and Brown, 3 finer (12/08).”

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,158 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dcarr said:
    The first product of the Denver Mint:

    Dan,

    Your example is exceptional like new. Mine has darkened up a little.

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s fascinating history regarding the process and logistics taken in setting up the Denver Mint presses to strike gold coins in 1906!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,158 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 9, 2022 1:43PM

    This is one of the early gold coins from the Denver Mint: The five-dollar gold was first.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So they had the big ceremony in September of 1904 and opened as an assay office in 1905, but did not strike coins until 1906. I still wonder what the delay was.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,158 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    So they had the big ceremony in September of 1904 and opened as an assay office in 1905, but did not strike coins until 1906. I still wonder what the delay was.

    Congressional funding?

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,819 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    I wonder why coinage did not begin until 1906?

    Trouble getting the appropriations maybe?
    .
    .

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Politicians had to decide what to mint? Design submissions? Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Starting at the 7:20 or so mark, there is a statement that says that the coinage could not begin in 1904 because the three presses intended for the Mint were at a World's Fair out in California, as San (something). Can anybody make that out, and when you can, what in the heck were they talking about? I cannot find a record of a World's Fair out in California in 1904-1905.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CaptainBluntCaptainBlunt Posts: 195 ✭✭✭

    No St. Louis
    New machinery for Denver would come from the Government display there

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,158 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Excerpt from Annual Report of the Director of the Mint to the Secretary of the Treasury Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1906
    Washington: Government Printing Office, 1906, Page 5-7. – Historical Reference Collection United States Mint

    Gold was first discovered in what is now the State of Colorado in 1858, on the Platte River, near the city of Denver, then embraced in the State of Kansas. Colorado was created a Territory by an act of Congress approved February 28, 1861. The discovery of gold in Colorado created much excitement and it was not long before there was a rush for the new gold fields. Owing to the lack of transportation the only means of the outside world to reach there was by wagon and stage across the plains. At times this was attended by great hardships, on account of hostilities of the Indians. In 1859 placer mining was carried on with great activity, not only on the Platte River, where gold was first discovered, but in other sections of the State. Mining was for some years confined exclusively to placer claims. Miners experienced considerable difficulty in disposing of their product, which was on account of lack of transportation facilities and the want of a circulating medium, and they were frequently compelled to dispose of their dust at a sacrifice. From 1860 to 1862 there were three firms, namely, Clark, Gruber & Co., John Parsons & Co., and John Conway & Co., who manufactured $5 and $10 gold pieces. Of these firms, Clark, Gruber & Co. were the most prominent and did the largest coinage, the coinage of the other firms being very limited.

    The mint in Denver was established by an act of Congress approved April 21, 1862. It was exclusively for the coinage of gold and the sum of $75,000 was appropriated to carry into effect the provisions of the act to meet the expenses for the fiscal year 1863.

    June 11, 1862, George W. Brown, Samuel E. Browne, district attorney, and Samuel H. Elbert, secretary of the Territory, were appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury as a committee to inquire into the expediency of purchasing the lot, building, and apparatus of Clark, Gruber & Co. for the branch mint of the United States at Denver. Dr. Oscar D. Munson, formerly connected with the mint at San Francisco, was authorized to confer with the committee. The committee reported in favor of the purchase of the plant of Clark, Gruber & Co., fixing the value of the same at $25,000, and on November 25, 1862, a formal offer was made by the Secretary of the Treasury to Clark, Gruber & Co. to purchase the plant for the sum of $25,000, which was accepted. It was found that the ground upon which the building was located was preempted by Clark, Gruber & Co., and they had not been able to perfect their title to the same, for the reason that no land office had been established for that district.

    On March 3, 1863, the following resolution was passed by Congress, enabling the Secretary of the Treasury to obtain a title to certain property in the city of Denver, for the purposes of the branch mint located in said place:

    Whereas the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, in order to carry into effect an act entitled “An act to establish a branch mint at Denver, in the Territory of Colorado,” approved April twenty-first, eighteen hundred and sixty-two, has purchased of Messrs Clarke, Gruber and Company, the preemptors and occupants thereof, certain city lots in said town of Denver, together with all the valuable improvements thereon;

    And whereas the said Clarke, Gruber and Company have not, and can not at an early day, perfect their title to said lots by entry of the same at the district land office, for the sole reason that no such office is yet established in said district;

    And whereas it is highly important for the interest of the Government to obtain at an early date the use and possession of said property to establish and open said mint: Therefore,

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized to receive and accept from said Clarke, Gruber and Company such relinquishments and conveyances of their right or claim to said lots and property as he, the said Secretary, shall deem sufficient for the extinguishment of any claim, right, or title which the said Clarke, Gruber and Company may or can have thereto. And said lots and property shall thereafter be reserved from public sale, preemption, or homestead settlement, and shall remain the property of the United States.

    Title was finally obtained to the property in April, 1863, and immediate steps were taken to equip the building, but the time required to prepare the building, and to have machinery, apparatus, etc., constructed in the East, transported to so distant a point, prevented the opening of the institution until the latter part of September, 1863.

    The operations of the mint were confined to the melting, refining, assaying, and stamping of the bullion, and the return of the same to the depositors in unparted bars, stamped with the weight and fineness. A superintendent, assayer, and coiner were appointed in November, 1862, and a melter and refiner in December, 1862. The institution continued on this basis until 1869, when Congress, on the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, provided that it should be conducted as an assay office, with an assayer in charge and a melter, the amount of bullion deposited not justifying its continuance as a branch mint with a full corps of officers. Operations were confined to the melting and assaying of bullion and its return to the depositors.

    An act was passed February 20, 1895, providing for the establishment of a mint at Denver, Colo., for the coinage of gold and silver.

    The bill making appropriations for legislative, executive, and judicial expenses of the Government for the fiscal year 1896, approved March 2, 1895, made provision for the purpose of a site and the commencement of a mint building at Denver, at a cost of $100,000, and authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to contract for the completing of a building at a cost, including site, heating, ventilating, fireproof vaults, etc., not exceeding $500,000. On April 22, 1896, a site was purchased at a cost of $60,261.71. The original appropriation for the construction of the building was not sufficient, and this was increased by additional appropriations to $800,228.01. This amount has been further increased by providing that the amount received for the sale of the old mint building, authorized by act of June 30, 1906, shall be applied to the finishing of the new building. The new building was occupied in 1904, but the coinage operations were not commenced until February, 1906.

    The amount appropriated for the equipment for the new building with machinery was $345,055, of which amount $327,258.50 have been expended.

    A view of the structure is shown in the frontispiece, and a detailed description of the equipment, which is believed to be of the most approved designs for all the operations of coinage, will be found elsewhere in the report.

    Compiled and transcribed by the United States Mint, Office of the Historian.

    Content last updated on January 23, 2017

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptainBlunt said:
    No St. Louis
    New machinery for Denver would come from the Government display there

    Seems odd that the new Mint would only get three coining presses, and that it would take over a year to move them to Denver once the St. Louis Fair was over.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CaptainBluntCaptainBlunt Posts: 195 ✭✭✭

    Agree…My guess is that additional machinery was being constructed in Philadelphia

    To be added to the presses coming from the Government display at the fair in St Louis

    One lone unparted gold bar poured in 1865 survives from Denver
    Stamped US Branch Mint Denver
    with an eagle holding arrows in its talons

    Really an assay office returning unparted bars during this time period as alluded to in the above history

  • kruegerkrueger Posts: 870 ✭✭✭

    Somewhere I read that it is estimated that around 75 of the 1905 medals exsist?
    few and far between found a So-called dollar. Most are toned Darker brown.
    I have owned four over the last 45 years. seen maybe 4 to 6 more.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    During one of the ANA Summer Seminars after the field trip to the Mint we went to a coin shop on Broadway north if Colfax and I pulled one of these from a $5 junk box.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,133 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    I wonder why coinage did not begin until 1906?

    My guess is the government had "the Grey Lady" in San Francisco, which was probably large enough to supply coins to the western region. Denver was an assay office which did turn gold and silver into ingots that could be shipped west. There was also a mint in Carson City until 1893. There was just no reason to press the issue at Denver until 1906.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file