Pleasing to the eye?
spyglassdesign
Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
Is this sort of old look attractive to some collectors?
0
spyglassdesign
Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
Unfortunately it is a bit too far gone for my taste. The toning is too dark, fingerprint, and dark streaks. It’s the kind of coins I would try to conserve somehow but it likely can’t be made whole again.
Not to mine.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
fingerprint and generally too dark
Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set
successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)
Some
I guess so with at least 5 people bidding. A bit too rustic for my taste too.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
Don't worry about what others think. All that matters is whether you like it or not.
However, nothing wrong with asking if you're on the fence
My opinion FWIW = pass
Not all bidders for coins like them or think they’re at all pleasing to the eye. Many simply bid at levels at which they think or know they can flip for a profit.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
What do you think the chances of a coin like that being able to be conserved by the likes of pcgs would be? Fair?
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
Nope.
Very low.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
There's an a$$ for every seat.
Some appreciate the level of originality that one has. I'm a lover of original skin and crust, but am not really a fan of that one overall, even though it has nice luster underneath. How does the reverse look?
Regarding conservation, probably would help in one way, and hurt in another. Until you know what you're doing, I'd leave the thought of conservation alone.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
And we haven't seen the rev.
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
I wouldn't buy it but I'm sure some would at the right price.
@pursuitofliberty yeah I was just curious. I'm going to pass on it but I find it beneficial to get feedback to see if my thinking is at least somewhat reasonable.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
@spyglassdesign well, other than the negative eye appeal from the toning, finger prints, streak and carbon spotting, the underlying surface quality (luster, strike and lack of distracting marks) is the right kind of stuff to be looking for
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
@pursuitofliberty that's what I'm thinking. It's several hundred dollars though... More than I'm willing to risk. I do see what you mean about the other factors tho.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
I can't handle a coin with an etched in finger print. Great coin otherwise.......
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
Suppose I disagree with what you think is reasonable. Would that encourage you to change your mind?
@MasonG by simply disagreeing, no. But if you gave me some reason to think differently I would certainly take it in and consider it.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
Fair enough. Suppose I gave you several reasons and you disagreed with them all. It still wouldn't change the fact that I liked the coin and you presumably didn't. Not everybody agrees on what's attractive.
@MasonG true. But I try to be more open minded than that when it comes to coins as I'm still learning. If someone says this particular factor hurts/helps it, I'm going to add that to my data set I've been consuming. For instance if someone says to pay attention to a certain feature because it could indicate a problem or highlight, I'm going to make use of that data for evaluating coins.
As you say ultimately it comes down to what I like, but I do value the opinions here since many of you are far beyond where I may ever be.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
A lot of it comes down to what your goals are. If it's buying coins you like, you can just do that. If you're concerned about what you can sell them for when you're tired of them, that's another story.
Any toning that can reasonably be described as "charcoal" is pass for me.
I personally see that as highly NEGATIVE eye appeal.
For your viewing pleasure.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/204038006728?hash=item2f819ce7c8:g:dL8AAOSwqvRizEPo
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
"1854-O Arrows Seated half dollar, NGC MS62, very pleasing" ?????
Individually, I don’t think any of those issues on the obverse would stop me from purchasing a coin I liked. All of them at one time is a bit much
BHNC #248 … 130 and counting.
Negative eye appeal on a coin that probably can't be successfully "conserved". A coin that will be a problem for its owner when it comes time to sell.
Ugly blotchy toning. Not for me.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
@spyglassdesign... It may be attractive to some collectors, but I believe the majority (great majority) would find it ugly. I am one of the majority. Cheers, RickO
For my part, I do find it attractive. Even the fingerprint is tolerable; though for me it's a matter of contrast and i admit this print shows more contrast than I'd like.
Notwithstanding, I like coins with character
and this one qualifies.
Nyet...for me anyway. A bit too dark and the print, the print!
K