First I am not an authority. But a little information and then you can look it over to see if anything matches up.
I don't see any problems with it from these photos. The known example you are showing has a different cc position / location. This one is closer (and could be the same).
.
.
.
Looking at the date and the position of the 1 it is almost centered between two dentils. That is the center of the 1 is between two dentils. So looking at VAM world I only found VAM 7 and VAM 9 to have the 1 in this position and they are 'near' dates or almost 'near' date. (Hope I didn't miss anything)
Here are the links.
VAM 9 (is suppose to have die chips in the 8 - see link)
Note from VAM 1 which has the c3a reverse also, the cc looks like it might not match yours but the photo is too close up for me. Not shown in VAM 9 link.
So check to see if either of these features can be seen on your coin. If so, then that should confirm it. If not, then maybe some others will chip in on this as VAM are not my thing.
Edit: I see vamzarockin commented while was typing the above out. Looking good.
The problem with all the CC Morgans is that they have been so heavily counterfeited that raw ones are always suspect. Comments on a board like this aren't really going to help you much when it comes time to sell. The coin needs to be slabbed by a major TPG to have good marketability.
My bigger concern is that the images are making it look cleaned (but genuine).
I don’t think it’s worth submitting unless you are pretty certain it will straight grade, and it’s part of a bulk economy submission.
Looks like honest wear to me, not manufactured, don't get it slabbed in that low grade though, it would be a waste of time and money.
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
Comments
For comparison, an 1890-CC we know to be authentic.
Can anyone speak authoritatively about this?
Weight is 26.55g which is OK for a slightly worn Morgan.
Now here's the in-hand phone pic of the reverse.
Not sure now if maybe I'm just imagining things.
And another quality check:
Edit: Sorry, F,F or G means fake, fraud, or genuine.
Looks okay to me.
First I am not an authority. But a little information and then you can look it over to see if anything matches up.
I don't see any problems with it from these photos. The known example you are showing has a different cc position / location. This one is closer (and could be the same).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df18/1df188dbf0094fbd877c3b3bb687ee48baecdd12" alt=""
.
.
.
Looking at the date and the position of the 1 it is almost centered between two dentils. That is the center of the 1 is between two dentils. So looking at VAM world I only found VAM 7 and VAM 9 to have the 1 in this position and they are 'near' dates or almost 'near' date. (Hope I didn't miss anything)
Here are the links.
VAM 7 (is suppose to have a double cc - see link)
http://www.vamworld.com/wiki/1890-CC_VAM-7
VAM 9 (is suppose to have die chips in the 8 - see link)
Note from VAM 1 which has the c3a reverse also, the cc looks like it might not match yours but the photo is too close up for me. Not shown in VAM 9 link.
http://www.vamworld.com/wiki/1890-CC_VAM-9
So check to see if either of these features can be seen on your coin. If so, then that should confirm it. If not, then maybe some others will chip in on this as VAM are not my thing.
Edit: I see vamzarockin commented while was typing the above out. Looking good.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed
RLJ 1958 - 2023
The problem with all the CC Morgans is that they have been so heavily counterfeited that raw ones are always suspect. Comments on a board like this aren't really going to help you much when it comes time to sell. The coin needs to be slabbed by a major TPG to have good marketability.
Nice date for CC Morgan. I have some raw ones but I do prefer them graded
I do not see anything that would make me think it was counterfeit... If it is your coin, get it slabbed. Cheers, RickO
My bigger concern is that the images are making it look cleaned (but genuine).
I don’t think it’s worth submitting unless you are pretty certain it will straight grade, and it’s part of a bulk economy submission.
VF, real deal. Don't bother wasting the slabbing money. Most common of all CC's and easily sold raw.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
bob
Looks OK from here.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
looks ok to me
Appears genuine to me too.
Looks like honest wear to me, not manufactured, don't get it slabbed in that low grade though, it would be a waste of time and money.
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
Appears genuine and technical VF but appears dipped from photos. Agree not worth slabbing.
An ANACS slab would probably help marketability without costing too much.
Sorry to bump my own thread, but wanted to say thanks to everyone who contributed here. Educational for me.