1921 Peace $1 Grade - Grade Posted
ilmcoins
Posts: 525 ✭✭✭✭
How do you think she will grade?
0
ilmcoins
Posts: 525 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
One more reverse
58
Fugazy 45 dipped
It may just be your photos but it kinda looks over dipped.
UNC Details
58
--Severian the Lame
ill go with this just saying
If the luster is good, then I'd guess 64.
62/63 range depending on the fields. I cannot quite tell from the images about them.
Sure does look heavily dipped..... If straight graded, 58. Cheers, RickO
My guess too.
(The Services are slightly liberal on grading the 1921s...)
peacockcoins
55
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
AU Details for me.
Successful BST with drddm, BustDMs, Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572
I think 62.
Coin Photographer.
58 details
I think the lighting makes it look over dipped. Under different lighting I would guess MS63.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Well struck obverse/weak reverse
Straight graded MS63
I had a 64 that looked somewhat like that. Apparently strike is not a huge grade limiting factor these days.
As others have said the lighting is difficult
But, if she isn't impaired, looks 58, with a possibility of Unc (63ish)
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
As long as nothing is hiding I'm at 63.
Collector, occasional seller
I see weakness/wear in the hair in the middle of the obverse, at least I think. That’s why I guessed 58. If it’s not wear, then I’d guess 62-63 based on the muted luster.
62
AU53 if it straight grades. RGDS!
AU details, cleaned.
She is part of the history so it may worth sending her in to our Host ☺️
Nice coin …… not too knowledgeable to tell whether it’s a details one but I think it’s AU 58 with very weak reverse 🤔
My first thought was 63.
That was my first thought. The pics are less than perfect but I don't see any actual wear and the contact marks are very few in number. The lighting is such that it's very difficult to assess the quality of the luster from those pics.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
MS63
Unfortunately I think it will be graded harshly.
I have sent several UNC 21s in for grading. The two best coins I own came back cleaned - one of them I could not find any hairlines and it has amazing luster (And I clearly overpaid for it) I did have one come back 64 but it was spotless and I thought it should be a 65. It did get a cac sticker tho.
I hope I’m wrong but that one likely get a tough grade.
And BTW if anyone looking for a nice 21 I have a few for sale - graded or raw - please pm me
Based on the photo looks like 62 shot 63 to me
63
Good job to all of those that said 63. Grade just popped at ANACS
What is your entire turn around time?
@basetsb_coins on Instagram
They received on the open date above