Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

GTG 1888 Morgan Grade revealed

2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 817 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 14, 2022 7:49AM in U.S. Coin Forum



I have owned this coin for several years, graded by PCGS in Europe….it resides in my “Box of Twenty “
Apologies for the reverse pic as my iPad is way smarter than me, i was unable to figure out how to rotate the pic..

Comments

  • Options
    DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,242 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64.

    Professional Numismatist. "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • Options
    Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭✭✭

    53

    Mr_Spud

  • Options
    DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Obverse looks MS 65, reverse is tough to grade based on the pic. When they grade coins like this the light used is considerably more powerful than yours.
    I'll go MS 65.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ill say 45

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i can't tell much other than it is a nicely toned morgan with some greasy greasy on it. i'll go 66+

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 23,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If the luster is muted, MS64.
    If the luster is strong, MS65.

    peacockcoins

  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 10,767 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cannot tell much about the luster from the photos, MS63.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    fathomfathom Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would 55 that guy because the weakness is just too pronounced to be mint state.

  • Options

    I would say MS 64.

    Collin Kubacak
    Professional Numismatist & Jeweler

  • Options
    alaura22alaura22 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU-55

  • Options
    jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've seen a few coins like this in 66 holders. I'm at 66.

    Young Numismatist, Coin Photographer.

  • Options
    WilliamFWilliamF Posts: 832 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cant tell from the pics if that is wear or just a weak strike, so I'm going to say between AU55 and MS62, not really sure on this one...

    ."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817

  • Options
    shortnockshortnock Posts: 371 ✭✭✭

    AU 55.

  • Options
    pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 6,593 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very difficult to grade from those images. Could be 58, 64 or maybe 65. All depends on the luster and if she's got rub. Best guess is 64.


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I will put it at XF45.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45.

  • Options
    al410al410 Posts: 2,403 ✭✭✭✭

    Very difficult to say from these pics because they seem to show wear instead of weak strike.
    XF range I am doubtful of AU

  • Options
    ccmorganccmorgan Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭

    XF-45

    Love the 1885-CC Morgan
  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 817 ✭✭✭✭✭


    Interesting comments for sure, the coin in hand has booming luster but the highest points of coin seem a bit flat…i imagine most of you know that a “Trueview” that appears like this when you check the image at PCGS was graded and photographed at PCGS Europe…

  • Options
    SlickCoinsSlickCoins Posts: 658 ✭✭✭

    The Date got me looking into the alignment,,, I was kinda curious to see if there was a pattern.
    I'm all about the arrows and the wheat on Morgans,,, maybe I'm way too hard on them.
    I'll pass on the grade I just wanted to show what I seen after looking closer.
    Thanks for sharing :)

  • Options
    fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 897 ✭✭✭✭

    Weakly struck coin. Many including me were fooled

  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 14, 2022 8:34AM

    I would never pay 66 money for a weakly struck/worn coin like that. In my book thats an XF coin no matter what the holder says.

    Here's a 66 and what it should look like.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 7,828 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow... I was in the XF/AU Camp! The weak strike and breaks in toning (and seeing zero mint luster) swayed my opinion.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @gumby1234 said:
    I would never pay 66 money for a weakly struck/worn coin like that. In my book thats an XF coin no matter what the holder says.

    Here's a 66 and what it should look like.

    Personally, I think the OP coin is more attractive than that coin. It has mark free surfaces, some good color, and although it may have a weaker strike, I would wager there's some luster in hand. If presented a choice between these two coins, I'd be taking the OP example. You also have to note that the picture plays a hand in how the detail appears.

    Young Numismatist, Coin Photographer.

  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thought 65 as the cheek is super clean and bubble like. 66 is lofty for sure and it must have very strong luster to overcome that weak strike.
    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a similar 7tf Morgan in a 63 holder. Then luster probably carries your coin into the high grade. Thank God for grading and knowing how to sell certifieds, as some dealers would give you a fraction of what the coin is worth.

  • Options
    fathomfathom Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kudos. Yes, the luster must be flashy. Weakly struck for the date though. I do not get that.

    Standards are now placing even more emphasis on eye appeal against technical?

    I have nothing more to say about my wild swing and miss.

  • Options
    SlickCoinsSlickCoins Posts: 658 ✭✭✭
    edited June 15, 2022 5:07AM

    Oh great coin don't get me wrong,, just the date looks strange to me. The last 8 looks like out of alignment. JMO
    Thanks

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 7,629 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 15, 2022 6:48AM

    So this is an example of a C coin? Coming out the gate the flat eagles breast got my thumbs down.

    So Cali Area - Coins & Currency
  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Solid GTG example - I would have said 64 - I wonder what cac would say as this might be a fabulous piece in hand.

  • Options
    RondorRondor Posts: 116 ✭✭✭

    I would have 50'd it. Wow.

    I would not buy that coin at any price in it's current holder. The seller would never sell where I would want it.

  • Options
    neildrobertsonneildrobertson Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I love the toning on this. I think everyone here is being unneccesarily harsh. I bet it looks very attractive in hand.

    I agree that the strike weakness is a drawback at that grade though.

    IG: DeCourcyCoinsEbay: neilrobertson
    "Numismatic categorizations, if left unconstrained, will increase spontaneously over time." -me

  • Options
    RexfordRexford Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would have guessed 65. Not sure where the XF/AU grades are coming from

  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 817 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish At some point i will send it to CAC and update the post…
    I thought we would get a bit of conversation going about PCGS Europe and their photography….it’s not super great! The coin in hand is pretty nice!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file