1878 and 1890 Morgan Dollar Grades
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27154/271543f9a5f52faa6b3a293ce8c04f0ed0bbd80c" alt="hbarbee"
Please help with an estimated grade for the two Morgan examples. These are raw and have never been certified.
Thanks
HB
0
Please help with an estimated grade for the two Morgan examples. These are raw and have never been certified.
Thanks
HB
Comments
64ish
Nice ones! I'll take a stab at it, though I don't know this series super well...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
for the 1878 I'd say no higher than 64, the reverse is almost flawless except for 2 tiny marks, but the obverse has a fair number of little marks and divots that would keep the grade down a couple notches imo...
the 1890 appears to have more luster and a stronger strike but it has also has quite a few bag marks, and some chatter on the face and in the obverse fields, I'd say 64+ on that one...
Again, I don't know this series too well, maybe I'm being too harsh on them, I'm interested to see what the experts have to say
Also, they'd probably get a grade bump because they are CC's...
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
63 or 64
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
64
63
Will’sProoflikes
The lighting makes it a little tougher to figure and of course not knowing the photo style should I say. The actual luster is not known so assuming normal cc luster which is typically good or better.
Agree with the 64 on 78. The 90cc obverse I am assuming that the field marks at 9 o/c are not as bad as they appear as the light is bright on them. Also two cuts, one on the jaw is heavier and the one in front of the ear appears as if it might continue into or onto the ear. If so it might be kind of large but can't determine depth and stuff. Maybe 63.
.
.
.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed
RLJ 1958 - 2023
Nice
Nicer
bobdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
63+
64
78CC = 64
90CC = 63
Thanks for the inputs. All seem to be pretty consistent. I was evaluating an inherited collection for a friend and these two have the highest value potential so I wanted confirmation.
1878-CC MS64
1890-CC MS63
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I agree.
64 and 63
MS64+
MS63
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Nice coins, they are choice unc 63/64.
Very high demand right now on both dates.
Agree. Morgan CC.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed
RLJ 1958 - 2023
I would call both of them MS64.... Nice CC Morgans. Cheers, RickO
64+ and 64
I agree with 64, maybe 64+, on the 78CC... and 63 on the 90CC...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Yup
Thanks.
I agree with the assessments. These are the highlights of the material that I have reviewed so far. I figured that neither would exceed a 64 on their best day, but there is such a step up in value to 65 that I wanted to make sure.
She provided me with a box of receipts that her dad had saved from coin purchases. He bought both of these coins in October 1972 and paid $19.95 for the 1878-CC and $119.50 for the 1890-CC. The closest reference book I have to that date shows that he may have even overpaid for the 1890-CC!
Ugh, the IRS is gonna slaughter you!
My grades:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a53b0/a53b01cf12072e7d21a5330f3ad3bea87652937b" alt=":p :p"
64+ for the 78
63- for the 90
Though, from the enlargements posted partway upthread, the 90 looks like a considerably stronger strike. Is that characteristic of the vintage?