Home U.S. Coin Forum

1878 and 1890 Morgan Dollar Grades

hbarbeehbarbee Posts: 193 ✭✭✭
edited June 4, 2022 6:53PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Please help with an estimated grade for the two Morgan examples. These are raw and have never been certified.
Thanks
HB

Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,246 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64ish

  • WilliamFWilliamF Posts: 831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice ones! I'll take a stab at it, though I don't know this series super well...
    for the 1878 I'd say no higher than 64, the reverse is almost flawless except for 2 tiny marks, but the obverse has a fair number of little marks and divots that would keep the grade down a couple notches imo...
    the 1890 appears to have more luster and a stronger strike but it has also has quite a few bag marks, and some chatter on the face and in the obverse fields, I'd say 64+ on that one...
    Again, I don't know this series too well, maybe I'm being too harsh on them, I'm interested to see what the experts have to say :)
    Also, they'd probably get a grade bump because they are CC's...

    ."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63 or 64

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • sweetwillietsweetwilliet Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭

    64
    63

    Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    Will’sProoflikes
  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The lighting makes it a little tougher to figure and of course not knowing the photo style should I say. The actual luster is not known so assuming normal cc luster which is typically good or better.
    Agree with the 64 on 78. The 90cc obverse I am assuming that the field marks at 9 o/c are not as bad as they appear as the light is bright on them. Also two cuts, one on the jaw is heavier and the one in front of the ear appears as if it might continue into or onto the ear. If so it might be kind of large but can't determine depth and stuff. Maybe 63.


    .

    .

    .

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice
    Nicer

    bob :)
    63+
    64

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    78CC = 64
    90CC = 63

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • hbarbeehbarbee Posts: 193 ✭✭✭

    Thanks for the inputs. All seem to be pretty consistent. I was evaluating an inherited collection for a friend and these two have the highest value potential so I wanted confirmation.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,988 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1878-CC MS64
    1890-CC MS63

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    1878-CC MS64
    1890-CC MS63

    I agree.

    When in doubt, don't.
  • SoldiSoldi Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 and 63

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,134 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64+
    MS63


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,776 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coins, they are choice unc 63/64.

    Very high demand right now on both dates.

  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fathom said:
    Nice coins, they are choice unc 63/64.

    Very high demand right now on both dates.

    Agree. Morgan CC.

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would call both of them MS64.... Nice CC Morgans. Cheers, RickO

  • zippcityzippcity Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭✭

    64+ and 64

    Save our Country. Positive BST: Collectorcoins- Mariner020648- profharoldhill- coppertoning- agentjim007- cucamongacoin- ElKevo- mercurydimeguy- Utahcoin-AJAAN-AUandAG- surfinxhi- ZoidMeister- TwoSides2acoin-
  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with 64, maybe 64+, on the 78CC... and 63 on the 90CC...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DennisH said:

    @MFeld said:
    1878-CC MS64
    1890-CC MS63

    I agree.

    Yup

  • hbarbeehbarbee Posts: 193 ✭✭✭

    Thanks.

    I agree with the assessments. These are the highlights of the material that I have reviewed so far. I figured that neither would exceed a 64 on their best day, but there is such a step up in value to 65 that I wanted to make sure.

    She provided me with a box of receipts that her dad had saved from coin purchases. He bought both of these coins in October 1972 and paid $19.95 for the 1878-CC and $119.50 for the 1890-CC. The closest reference book I have to that date shows that he may have even overpaid for the 1890-CC!

  • conrad99conrad99 Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    @hbarbee said:
    He bought both of these coins in October 1972 and paid
    $19.95 for the 1878-CC and $119.50 for the 1890-CC.

    Ugh, the IRS is gonna slaughter you!

    My grades:
    64+ for the 78
    63- for the 90
    :p

  • conrad99conrad99 Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    Though, from the enlargements posted partway upthread, the 90 looks like a considerably stronger strike. Is that characteristic of the vintage?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file