Home U.S. Coin Forum

Population Reports

I am currently reading David Bower's Book - Collecting and Investing in Rare Coins and in the book he discusses how population reports from grading services like PCGS and NGC are not necessarily accurate reflections of the population of uncirculated coins (i.e., lots of mint state coins are currently sitting raw and have not been submitted to grading services yet). Aside from knowledge gained through years / decades in the industry, how might a beginner / intermediate collector mitigate the risk of acquiring a coin that appears rare based on population reports, but is actually quite common given large ungraded inventory?

Comments

  • RandomsRandoms Posts: 164 ✭✭✭

    Look to see how many are for sale. eBay is a good example. If not to many are for sale or have been sold that may be an indication

  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It could help if you narrowed the discussion to what type of coin / series you are thinking about. Mint products, modern coins, earlier 20th century, old or classics. Answers could vary.

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • JMoo100JMoo100 Posts: 112 ✭✭

    I predominantly collect late 19th and early 20th century silver coins (silver dollars, walkers, etc.).

  • djmdjm Posts: 1,563 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JMoo100 said:
    I predominantly collect late 19th and early 20th century silver coins (silver dollars, walkers, etc.).

    Considering we are 35 years in on certifying these types of coins. The majority of higher-grade coins have already been certified. If you are looking at lower grade mint state coins MS63 and below there are many that have not been certified yet as they haven't been worth the investment.

  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What @djm said.

    Another way to think of it is, the market for these type of coins is well established and the price for say a common TPG MS63 is with the knowledge that all the uncertified examples exist. These may even trade in bulk sometimes. So while the book is correct that the population reports do not represent all the ungraded examples, the ungraded examples are known.

    To get some idea of which ones might be common with many ungraded examples you could look at the pcgs price guide. The Morgan type price for a MS63 and MS64 currently is 96 and 155 (wow that has gone up since I last looked). So if you page down the list of prices and see any priced at or near those numbers, it is a decent bet that they are common and with many ungraded examples in the market. Again a well established market.

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/detail/morgan-dollar/744/most-active

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwmUMvhy-lY - Pink Me And Bobby McGee
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Population reports aren't even accurate for just the graded coins. Many coins get cracked out and resubmitted over and over again. Then many people buy slabbed coins and then crack them out and put them into an album. Later when the collection gets sold somebody else submits for grading. Unless its a pop of 1 then there is no way to know the accuracy.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • alefzeroalefzero Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Depends on when Bowers wrote it. Into the 1990s, Stack's auctions still had primarily raw coins. There were still a lot more cabinet collectors than today.

    Apart from that, pop reports are off due to crackout regrades and crossovers without tag returns. This is most true with the most sensitive of dates and varieties. When a single point upgrade more than doubles the market valuation, you better believe such candidate coins have been resubmitted many times. The only way to really get a pulse on populations is to watch the market for them over many years. But now with auction archives, a good and careful student of those coins can do so much more quickly. Need to recognize duplicates reappearing in other holders though.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,246 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @djm said:

    @JMoo100 said:
    I predominantly collect late 19th and early 20th century silver coins (silver dollars, walkers, etc.).

    Considering we are 35 years in on certifying these types of coins. The majority of higher-grade coins have already been certified. If you are looking at lower grade mint state coins MS63 and below there are many that have not been certified yet as they haven't been worth the investment.

    Perhaps the majority of higher VALUE coins. I would be willing to bet there are more raw than slabbed Morgans and Walkers in 64 or under. Even 65 might well be more raw than slabbed, at least for common dates.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Years of study, population reports, auctions, forums etc. And even then, the results will be approximations. However, you will have gained considerable knowledge along the way. Cheers, RickO

  • streeterstreeter Posts: 4,312 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You just have to 'get a feel' for what is out there.

    Some coins have a price that doesn't corrolate to how scarce they are. A 14-d lincoln, 16-d Merc or a 1916 slq in high au condition would generate a lot of interest and possibly blow past the price guide.

    You have to mesh your knowledge of prices, pop reports and coins you seldom see to get that feel.

    Have a nice day
  • ms71ms71 Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 30, 2022 9:29AM

    Deep and ongoing study of the market is the only way to get a good feel for "what's out there". Most, of course, undertake such a study with a very limited number of specific series or specialty areas.

    Successful BST transactions: EagleEye, Christos, Proofmorgan,
    Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins

    Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.

    My mind reader refuses to charge me....

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file