Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems to have better details than a G4, looks like it was net graded.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see. It's not net graded, its a details grade of good details, scratches. I agree it should have said vg details, scratches. I just don't think the grading services fret too much about it, even though they should try to get it right.

    Tom

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree it was likely net graded due to the reverse. The obverse could get an 08. Cheers, RickO

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I feel it would have been G06, if not for the reverse.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hard use, cleaned & retoned thus net graded

  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So NGC net grades even a details graded coin before identifying the problem? That just sounds silly. I could see a net grade on a straight graded coin, but why net grade the "detail" grade? I don't think that is what they do, though I confess I don't know. I think it is much more likely that they either believe it is a good details coin, or they made a mistake and it should be a VG details coin. ANACS used to give a "details" grade and a net grade, but the group's interpretation would be the opposite of what ANACS used to do. To me, details refers to the details before the problems.

    Tom

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file