Home U.S. Coin Forum

1921 Peace Dollar with Doubled "PEACE" & Grading Challenge

C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

Hello everyone. My wife and I have a 1921 Peace Dollar that I was looking at the other day and I noticed the word PEACE on the reverse of the coin is double. I expected it was a VAM or one sort or another, but was unable to locate it. Apparently there was a former designation of VAM-2, but it has been removed as a VAM and is listed as a "Strike or Machine Doubling" by VAM World. Can anyone here tell me what that means in terms of the coin? Is it a minting error?

I'm really not asking in terms of premium increase. I'm just genuinely curious on the doubling. Please let me know what it means. Thanks.

Skills test side note, anyone want to attempt to grade this coin?

-C2C



Comments

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    Extra photos:








  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That doubling does not exist in the die itself. It is the result of the die and/or planchet shifting slightly (laterally) during the strike.

    Regardless, that is well-struck 1921 Peace Dollar (better strike than average for those).

    MS63.

  • WAYNEASWAYNEAS Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Still a great looking coin no matter what.
    Wayne

    Kennedys are my quest...

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,525 ✭✭✭✭✭

    100% Machine doubling. That is a nice looking '21, I would probably hit it with some MS70 >:) .
    My grade guess is MS63, maybe 64...

    Collector, occasional seller

  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,789 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 14, 2022 11:00AM

    It's well struck, so that is good no matter what. These are notoriously difficult to grade, especially from a photo. I was thinking 62 but I really don't see any wear at all, so I will also say 63. I'm curious as I just bought one myself, which I intend to submit. I believe mine is the VAM-1C. Can I have that VAM varietized at our host (for a fee, of course), or do they not do all VAMs?

    Tom

  • vplite99vplite99 Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I suspect some rub than is not obvious in the photos, so I'm going with AU58.

    Vplite99
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,525 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TPRC said:
    It's well struck, so that is good no matter what. These are notoriously difficult to grade, especially from a photo. I was thinking 62 but I really don't see any wear at all, so I will also say 63. I'm curious as I just bought one myself, which I intend to submit. I believe mine is the VAM-1C. Can I have that VAM varietized at our host (for a fee, of course), or do they not do all VAMs?

    They do not recognize all VAMs.
    https://www.pcgs.com/vamvarieties
    This is the list of VAMs that they recognize. Ignore that it says "Morgan" at the top as it includes Peace Dollars as well. I've informed them of this oversight long ago and no one has bothered to fix it.
    Also of note- this list is missing 2 of the "Elite 30" Peace VAMs, the 1921 VAM 1H and 1F, both of which have PCGS coin numbers, and are required for the Elite 30 Registry sets.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As stated, a great example of mechanical doubling and not an error. Nice looking dollar, My first thought from the first pics was 58. After looking at the additional photos I will go with MS63.

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭
    edited March 14, 2022 12:14PM

    Thanks everyone. I'm going to give just a little longer on any grading and then I'll reveal the whole coin with label. I appreciate all of the information.

    I may break out the Nikon Z6 II to try and help. I'll tell you all this, the blurring you're seeing in some if the photos is the iPhone and lighting.

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess AU55

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,798 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So much of this depends on luster. From what I think I'm seeing, MS62 or MS63.

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭
    edited March 14, 2022 9:39PM

    Keeping in mind that photos significantly limit grading capabilities, no winners on this one, except maybe my wife who owns this coin.

    I appreciate all of the comments and the attempts. I'm a Morgan Dollar guy and am not as familiar with Peace Dollars. They are my wife's thing. But here comes the great reveal...

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    And here she is:

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    @TPRC said:
    It's well struck, so that is good no matter what. These are notoriously difficult to grade, especially from a photo. I was thinking 62 but I really don't see any wear at all, so I will also say 63. I'm curious as I just bought one myself, which I intend to submit. I believe mine is the VAM-1C. Can I have that VAM varietized at our host (for a fee, of course), or do they not do all VAMs?

    Absolutely notoriously difficult, especially from a photo. Just thought it would be a fun side challenge. :)

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,786 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats, I like it.

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,525 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow I was off quite a bit. Very nice!

    Collector, occasional seller

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    Wow I was off quite a bit. Very nice!

    You were the closest as you said "maybe 64"

    These things are crazy hard to grade. I struggle with the 1921 more than the rest because of the high relief, but like I said, I'm the Morgan guy in the family, wife is the peace dollar lady of the house. ;)

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    It is an outstanding coin though. She chose it early on in her collecting, so she didn't pick off of grade or cac. She picked it off of comparison to others. She has a habit of blindly choosing the most expensive things...

  • WAYNEASWAYNEAS Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65+ Wow!
    Congrats.
    Wayne

    Kennedys are my quest...

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    @WAYNEAS said:
    65+ Wow!
    Congrats.
    Wayne

    In basketball, we'd say "And 1"

    MS65+ CAC.. ;)

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,481 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's definitely worth the high grade..........for the strike alone.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • ccmorganccmorgan Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭

    I always wondered why is the U a V in TRUST?

    Love the 1885-CC Morgan
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin.... I forgot to add my guess as to grade when I posted. I was thinking 64.... Cheers, RickO

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    @ccmorgan said:
    I always wondered why is the U a V in TRUST?

    It's a good question. I looked this up once. Turns out, it was intentional. The Allies in WW-I were victorious over Wilhelm and the German 2nd Reich, so to mark the victory, the US Mint, authorized by the United States Congress, used a V in Trust to mark the "V"ictory. Hence, In God We TRVST.

    I love, love, love history...

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,566 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin and it is always worth looking for the varieties. But I know a dealer who says that if it isn't in the Redbook, he's not interested in offering premiums.

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,798 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 16, 2022 3:27PM

    The V was not put on the Peace dollar to symbolize "Victory." In the classic Latin alphabet, V was used as both a consonant and a vowel. That's also why we use a "W" to symbolize "double-U". Our modern U didn't really make it to print until the 1600s.

    When an artist is trying to imply something from the classic period, they'll sometimes use symbolism like this.

    image

    From New York City:

    image

  • Che_GrapesChe_Grapes Posts: 1,884 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is really hard to grade these from photos - and although I did not guess I would have been nowhere near that one... just crazy.

    I have a 64 that looks much, much better than my 65...
    but I had the 65 first or I probably wouldn’t own it!

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭
    edited March 16, 2022 6:46PM

    @BryceM said:
    The V was not put on the Peace dollar to symbolize "Victory." In the classic Latin alphabet, V was used as both a consonant and a vowel. That's also why we use a "W" to symbolize "double-U". Our modern U didn't really make it to print until the 1600s.

    When an artist is trying to imply something from the classic period, they'll sometimes use symbolism like this.

    image

    From New York City:

    image

    Tragedy of that history I love so much, is that it's constantly being rewritten. I shared what I discovered on it, whether its correct, or incorrect, would probably take a US Minting worker to clarify. Regardless, two plausible answers, I'll defer since I was not there. Thanks for the photo samples and the grammar background.

  • C2CC2C Posts: 108 ✭✭✭

    @Che_Grapes said:
    It is really hard to grade these from photos - and although I did not guess I would have been nowhere near that one... just crazy.

    I have a 64 that looks much, much better than my 65...
    but I had the 65 first or I probably wouldn’t own it!

    I had the same issue with a 1878-CC in MS65 vs my 1878-CC in MS66. The MS65 was the clear winner with zero descenders when the grades were covered. Strike, contact marks, tone, everything was better on the MS65... I'm told by other forum members, after showing a photo of the coin, that the MS65 had possibly been "over dipped" by some dealer who knows when. They are both in PCGS holders, but as I said, the 65 has better eye appeal.

    As for this peace dollar, it's wifey's and it is very nice in hand. I knew grading off of iPhone 13 Pro Max photos would be difficult. It bokeh's some areas it shouldn't, over sharpens others it shouldn't, but unless I pull out my Nikon, it's the best I readily had available.

  • ccmorganccmorgan Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭

    @C2C said:

    @ccmorgan said:
    I always wondered why is the U a V in TRUST?

    It's a good question. I looked this up once. Turns out, it was intentional. The Allies in WW-I were victorious over Wilhelm and the German 2nd Reich, so to mark the victory, the US Mint, authorized by the United States Congress, used a V in Trust to mark the "V"ictory. Hence, In God We TRVST.

    I love, love, love history...

    Thank you!!! Wonderful story and it makes sense. I'm a WWII enthusiast and love war relics. Had some WWII and Korean war friends but sadly there gone now.
    But the war was over in '18?

    Love the 1885-CC Morgan
  • ccmorganccmorgan Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭
    edited March 17, 2022 8:43AM

    @BryceM said:
    The V was not put on the Peace dollar to symbolize "Victory." In the classic Latin alphabet, V was used as both a consonant and a vowel. That's also why we use a "W" to symbolize "double-U". Our modern U didn't really make it to print until the 1600s.

    When an artist is trying to imply something from the classic period, they'll sometimes use symbolism like this.

    image

    From New York City:

    image

    Well there are 5 more U's on the reverse of the Peace dollar so why not 5 more V's?

    Love the 1885-CC Morgan
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,798 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same reason as the SLQ dollar, which preceded the Peace Dollar design by several years, I suppose. In 1916 it darn sure didn't signify "Victory". It's artistic.

    image

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,786 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats, I like it.

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file