1959 1c
RobertLahti
Posts: 328 ✭✭✭
First 3 pictures:
Before the strengthened restored obverse of 1959, it looked like this.
The bottom of 9 shows a misaligned doubling with an errant 9 hubbed above, (under) which on Denver just happens to be missing the large loop tip.
Last picture:
The next is the full beautiful restored obverse of 1959, we all know.
Just the R in its modification doubling.
Doubling not only on the subsurface leg, but on the revised R face. Two types.
We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?
0
Comments
First 2, unrevised.
Last 2, revised.
We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?
Am I dreaming?
Coins are Neato!
"If it's a penny for your thoughts and you put in your two cents worth, then someone...somewhere...is making a penny." - Steven Wright
Just nope.
No idea.
What I see is not a DDO but machine doubling.
As for "revised", I have no clue.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
May I suggest that perhaps the OP should volunteer for substance rehabilitation. Cheers, RickO
So is the fact that "ignore" doesn't suppress threads started by the ignored a bug or a feature?
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I think it's time for a shadow banning by the mods.
Imagination. I’m sorry I don’t see anything your talking about.
Hoard the keys.
To be fair, he said "doubling " without specifying the type.