My latest Coin Week article on a Bad 1901-S Barber quarter

I wrote this article with support from friends in the Barber Coin Collectors Society since I am an early copper guy.
Without images of the edge it is hard to confirm if it is a "put together coin" or struck, but we have not seen others, suggesting it is a unique counterfeit.
Ironic there was a similar coin (with the correct reverse type) in the previous RCMR.
10
Comments
Great work helping to inform & protect the coin community!
Thank you! Really appreciate all of the work you do!
The wear on the reverse does not seem to match that on the obverse. Is that something that is seen on the genuine coins?
If it isn't would seem to suggest that the piece may be put together from two different coins.
Thanks for the information... The rim should definitely alert observant collectors. Cheers, RickO
Correcto ricko.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
A similar graded genuine example:
Aside from the wear,seeing two significantly different "looks" front and back in the OP images.The edge needs to be examined carefully for evidence of tampering with the reeding. Almost impossible for a counterfeiter to get an exact alignment of reeds by simply "sandwiching" two coin halves.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
The on-line cert for the subject example has been removed.
Nice!
Great information and I was not aware of the Type III reverse difference!
Everyone of my research efforts results in my learning something new as well @giorgio11 ! My experience is with early copper, so every time I go out of my comfort zone I lean on specialists of the subject series in the process. Have joined a number of coin clubs and learned a lot through the effort!
Thanks for the posting @burfle23
I am a little wiser today.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
Thanks!