Certainly a proof, but whether a brilliant or satin I am not sure(probably brilliant). This coin has been listed for a while and definitely has some problems.
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Comments
I'm not really an expert, but looks right. Square rims, good strike. Not the best photos.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/393608651444?hash=item5ba4e762b4:g:V24AAOSwLyRhWVp5
Looks OK to me.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Real
Looks like a genuine but harshly cleaned proof to me.
Sure looks like a proof cent.... got some age spots, but in likely cleaned condition. Cheers, RickO
real, cleaned and hairlined
BHNC #203
Certainly a proof, but whether a brilliant or satin I am not sure(probably brilliant). This coin has been listed for a while and definitely has some problems.
Collector, occasional seller
It's a proof that looks hairlined to death.
Shame it was cleaned.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
It is real, a real dog.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Is there such a thing as a lowball set for proofs?
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer, see my portfolio here: (http://www.donahuenumismatics.com/).
I would pass on it.
It is always best to see the coin in hand.
Hit one of the major shows if you can or try BST here.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
I'm saying it's a real '36 satin. The '36 satin is notorious for die polish lines (look at the coinfacts images), but this one looks whizzed.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
@alpha33 Wise move to post here for advise before purchase.
I think you can do better. That coin has too many defects that are negative to the grade. IMO. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, Ricko, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, Jzyskowski1, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich
On a coin like that, I always wonder why the coin is not in a reputable holder.
I'd pass for the reasons already listed above.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!