@DeplorableDan said:
To me it looks like the o/s variation, but hard to tell from that photo. I’m sure someone with more experience will chime in
Is there a known O over S in 1900.
I don’t think there is, that’s just what it looks like to me. I actually completely missed the 1900 in the title, I saw the mint mark and compared it to some images and it looks very similar, but hard to tell with a low res image
MHCoin
Posts: 5 ✭
Comments
To me it looks like the o/s variation, but hard to tell from that photo. I’m sure someone with more experience will chime in
Type Collector of U.S. Pre-33 Gold https://instagram.com/deplorable_dan Successful transactions with- @drfish, @Cladiator, @johnny010, @Pedzola, @PerryHall, @2windy2fish, @Ike1964, @JohnThePainter, @rpmsrpms, @REALGATOR
Can we get a close-up pic of the mintmark?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
It’s only as good as zooming in on the auction photo
Looks more like a ding on the O to me.
Definitely not an O/Cc
Is there a known O over S in 1900.
I don’t think there is, that’s just what it looks like to me. I actually completely missed the 1900 in the title, I saw the mint mark and compared it to some images and it looks very similar, but hard to tell with a low res image
Type Collector of U.S. Pre-33 Gold https://instagram.com/deplorable_dan Successful transactions with- @drfish, @Cladiator, @johnny010, @Pedzola, @PerryHall, @2windy2fish, @Ike1964, @JohnThePainter, @rpmsrpms, @REALGATOR
I picked up this on at Sam Sloats a while ago in their junk box, it turned out to be an o/cc.
Difficult to determine from the OP pictures, but I am familiar with the O/CC variety, and that does not appear to be one. ICBW.... Cheers, RickO
Not that I know of